Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Will Unions See The Tap Run Dry?

10/31/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Owen Voutsinas-Klose
Owen Voutsinas-Klose is a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania

In one of the most closely watched cases of the current Supreme Court term, Janus v. AFSCME, newly minted Justice Neil Gorsuch is expected to deliver a significant blow to public sector unions by ruling, along with the conservative wing of the court, that mandatory public union dues are unconstitutional.  

The case, brought by Illinois state employee Mark Janus against his union, centers around “fair share fees”, also known as agency fees.  The Supreme Court ruled in a 1977 decision known as Abood v. Detroit Board of Education that public sector non-union members can be forced to pay agency fees in lieu of dues to cover the union’s cost of negotiating a contract that benefits all employees.  While non-union members cannot be forced to subsidize political activity, the challengers in Janus contend that forcing a public sector employee to subsidize a contract negotiation as a condition for employment violates their right to free speech under the First Amendment. Unions and their allies meanwhile defend the unanimous 1977 Abood decision, and its contention that reasonable payments in lieu of dues to recuperate costs of negotiation, so long as the dues do not go to explicitly political purposes, are allowed.

​
This is the second time in the last year that the court has heard a challenge to Abood.  In 2016, the court looked ready to strike down Abood in the case of Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, but the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia resulted in a deadlock that left the issue unsettled.  However, the appointment of Justice Neil Gorsuch to the court likely signals the end of Abood, giving anti-union activists their best shot yet at overturning it.  In recent years, the court’s conservatives have taken a fresh look at overturning Abood, with Justice Samuel Alito in 2014 calling the decision “questionable,” and writing that it is a “bedrock principle” that “no person in this country may be compelled to subsidize speech by a third party that he or she does not wish to support.”[1]

Without mandatory agency fees, unions will grapple with a massive free rider problem, meaning that employees could now benefit from union contracts without being compelled to pay dues to support the union.  Labor experts predict a mass exodus of employees from union rolls, now without any incentive to stay. The recent promulgation of right-to-work laws, whereby payment of union dues cannot be a condition of employment, has reduced union rolls to their lowest numbers of the modern era.  Public sector union membership, at 34.5%, is significantly higher than the private sector number of 6.5%.  But it has dropped by 8% since 2000, and would decline even more significantly if Janus v. AFSCME makes all states effectively “right-to-work” for public sector employees. [2]

Unions are already reacting to this potentially dramatic loss of revenue by making changes in their budgeting and political strategy.  For example, New York’s United Federation of Teachers (UFT) is planning a massive cut to its $156 million a year budget, anticipating the ruling and predicting that 20-30% of its teachers will quit the membership rolls.  If Janus is successful, the UFT would now have to get written consent from each member in order to deduct the dues, an arduous process that has wreaked financial havoc on unions in similar situations. For example, the NY Transportation Workers Union had automatic dues collection suspended for 17 months in 2015 and 2016 after an illegal strike, and lost millions in revenue after workers no longer were compelled to pay dues. [3]

An analysis by the Huffington Post found that organized labor spent a whopping $1.7 Billion during the 2012 election cycle, much of it from public employee unions.  Strapped for cash, the public unions such as AFSCME that play a key role in politics in all fifty states, particularly Democratic-leaning ones, will be dramatically curtailed. [4]  Janus v. AFSCME represents one of the first tangible examples of the 2016 election result on the Supreme Court, and will have far reaching implications by reducing the political might of public employee unions and their bargaining power on issues such as school reform, pensions and taxes.  
​

[1] Savage, David G. "Supreme Court poised to deal a sharp blow to unions for teachers and public employees." Los Angeles Times. September 28, 2017. Accessed October 10, 2017. http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-court-unions-20170928-story.html
[2] Barrett, Katherine, and Richard Greene. "How Unions Are Already Gearing Up for a Supreme Court Loss." Governing magazine: State and local government news for America's leaders. October 5, 2017. Accessed October 10, 2017. http://www.governing.com/topics/mgmt/gov-janus-afscme-right-to-work-states-unions.html.
[3] Campanile, Carl. "UFT may have to dramatically slash $182M budget." New York Post. September 05, 2017. Accessed October 12, 2017. http://nypost.com/2017/09/04/uft-may-have-to-dramatically-slash-182m-budget/.
[4] Howe, Amy. "Will the third time be the charm for challenge to public-sector union fees?" SCOTUSblog. June 09, 2017. Accessed October 12, 2017. http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/06/will-third-time-charm-challenge-public-sector-union-fees/
Photo Credit: Flickr User/Fibonacci Blue 

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.



​
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sam Nadler
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​