Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Trump’s War on the WTO: Undermining the Dispute Settlement Body

4/11/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Anna Schwartz
Anna Schwartz is a sophomore at the University of Pennsylvania studying Political Science, French, and Economic Policy.

​
The purpose of the WTO is to promote fair, efficient, and free global trade. At the heart of the WTO is its Appellate Body (AB), which resolves conflict between member states through processes of appeals and dispute settlement. Seven members serve on the AB with four year terms that are renewable once. The judges are balanced to reflect a range of nationalities, but do not act on behalf of their countries. Rather, they are experts in international trade who are chosen to temporarily speak for the WTO [1]. Through the reduction of the AB and threats of noncompliance with WTO decisions, President Donald Trump is executing a multi-pronged attack on the global trade system.
Gradual eroding of the AB by the United States is not new. Specifically, the US has objected to decisions against US anti-dumping policies. A country is considered to be “dumping” when they lower export prices to undercut competition and form a monopoly in an international market. Retaliatory tariffs aim to bring the product up to a fair price, but the WTO has found that the US abuses them in the steel industry [2, 3]. Consequently, the AB board members who rule against the US become unliked by the US [4]. The US expresses its dissatisfaction with these members by threatening the AB as a whole.

Blocking the reappointment of judges undermines the court by freezing its procedures and weakening its legitimacy. Since terms expire every four years, members must be renewed or new members must be selected to take their spots. The appointments are approved by consensus, so any nation in the WTO can veto a new or returning judge. To hear an appeal, at least three members are required. If the body shrinks to two members, it is rendered irrelevant. Moreover, any reduction in the size of the AB diminishes its validity. Since the judges are diversified to represent geographical regions with distinct customs, fewer members leads to a smaller reference base of legal principles. Former president Barack Obama was the first to use this strategy during his administration: he decided not to reappoint two American members and then blocked the appointment of a South Korean member. Yet following months of protests from other members of the WTO, Obama agreed to the appointment of two new members from South Korea and China [5]. At the end of Obama’s term, six judges sat on the AB. Trump has adopted the approach to all but destroy the dispute settlement system. 

Throughout his time in office, Trump has vetoed the reappointment of all members who have reached the conclusion of their four year cycles, and failed to nominate replacements. In December 2018, the US trade representative blocked the most recent reappointment. Only one appellate each from the US, China, and India remain [6]. If he acts consistently going forward, the AB will fall apart later in 2019, when two of the last three judge’s terms are set to expire [7]. While Trump conducts an underground assault on the AB, he conducts a second, more public attack with his rhetoric.

Trump has not hid his contemptment for the WTO. In August 2018 he announced that “if they don’t shape up, I would withdraw from the WTO.” Even further, he claims that the US has “rarely won a lawsuit except for last year,” but “in the last year, we’re starting to win a lot… Because they know if we don’t, I’m out of there” [8]. However, of the 54 cases brought by the US over the life of the WTO, it won at least one finding in its favor in 49 of them, or 91 percent of the time. Of the 80 cases brought against it, a WTO panel ruled against it in at least one aspect in 69 cases, or 86 percent of the time [9]. In US-China disputes over the last sixteen years, the win-loss ratio is 19-0, with four cases pending [10]. Thus the US wins about as much as it loses, if not more. Its record with China is particularly favorable. Still, Trump releases statements saying the contrary, damaging the organization's reputation. 

At every available opportunity, the president chips away at the foundations of the global trade system. In response to a Chinese complaint in March 2019, Trump announced that import tariffs are necessary to national security. If filed to the WTO, the argument would set a bad precedent: a broad definition of security that could justify any unfair trade practice [11]. In the same month, the dispute settlement body attempted to meet to discuss Venezuela’s effort against American tariffs. Trump refused to approve the agenda because he did not want to recognize president Nicolas Maduro’s regime. Event schedules must pass by consensus, but approval is historically a formality. A WTO agenda has not been turned down since 1999. [12]. Both examples show Trump’s willingness promote his political interests at the expense of the WTO. Whether it is through the diminishment of the AB or the devaluing of its name, Trump is likely to cripple the fundamental conflict resolution mechanism of international trade.

Works Cited
[1] "Appellate Body Members." WTO. Accessed March 27, 2019. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/ab_members_descrp_e.htm.
[2] Elsig, Manfred, Mark Pollack, and Gregory Shaffer. "Trump Is Fighting an Open War on Trade. His Stealth War on Trade May Be Even More Important." The Washington Post. September 27, 2017. Accessed March 27, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/09/27/trump-is-fighting-an-open-war-on-trade-his-stealth-war-on-trade-may-be-even-more-important/?utm_term=.a18a96c3376f.
[3] "Technical Information on Anti-dumping." WTO. Accessed March 27, 2019. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_info_e.htm.
[4] Elsig, Manfred, and Mark A. Pollack. “Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at the World Trade Organization.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 2 (June 2014): 391–415. doi:10.1177/1354066112448201.
[5] Ibid., at 2.
[6] Ibid., at 1.
[7] Hillman, Jennifer A. "How to Make the Trade War Even Worse." The New York Times. December 17, 2018. Accessed March 27, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/opinion/trade-war-china-wto.html.
[8] Micklethwait, John, Margaret Talev, and Jennifer Jacobs. Bloomberg. August 31, 2018. Accessed March 27, 2019. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-30/trump-says-he-will-pull-u-s-out-of-wto-if-they-don-t-shape-up.
[9] Ibid., at 8.
[10] Schott, Jeffrey J., and Euijin Jung. "In US-China Trade Disputes, the WTO Usually Sides with the United States." Peterson Institute for International Economics. March 12, 2019. Accessed March 27, 2019. https://piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/us-china-trade-disputes-wto-usually-sides-united-states.
[11] Lawder, David. "U.S. Says Rejects WTO's 'straitjacket' of Trade Obligations." Reuters. March 02, 2019. Accessed March 27, 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china/u-s-says-rejects-wtos-straitjacket-of-trade-obligations-idUSKCN1QJ01R.
[12] Keaten, Jamey. "US Ratchets up Dispute with Venezuela's Maduro at WTO Body." Associated Press News. March 26, 2019. Accessed March 27, 2019. https://apnews.com/800ad6751ae54c518e144af9603ef782.
Photo Credit:  Matthew Bey 

https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/trump-and-wtos-uncertain-future
​
​The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
​
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sam Nadler
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​