Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

To Disbar or Not to Disbar?

3/8/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Joseph Anderson
Joe Anderson is a sophomore in the College studying Political Science and History. In addition to writing for the Roundtable, he is a member of the Penn Policy Consulting Group and Penn Debate Society, and a fellow at the Marks Family Writing Center.
Two days after a pro-Trump mob unraveled congressional proceedings to certify the 2020 Electoral College results, students and alumni of law schools across the country petitioned for state bar associations to disbar Senators Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley, arguing they encouraged the Capitol siege by objecting to Biden’s victory [1]. The senators called for an electoral commission to investigate the contrived fraud claims, and to grant state legislatures the right to change their votes as they saw fit [2]. Their objections legitimized the lies which animated the siege, but disbarment never came to fruition. It was hindered by state bar associations’ unwillingness to involve themselves in politics. Little could be done: the senators’ actions were sanctioned by institutional procedure, and no precedent exists for disbarring elected lawyers for their votes, no matter how unseemly. While Hawley and Cruz couched their objections in concerns about election integrity, their remedy would have overruled state law and opened the door to undermining millions of legal votes. But the Missouri, Texas, and D.C. associations had their hands tied.
Their refusal to act is not unexpected. State bars historically revoke membership over serious crimes or egregious court behavior. Some pro-Trump lawyers who peddled the most extreme conspiracy theories face federal investigation and potential disbarment [3]. But courtrooms have inconsistent standards for sanctioning lawyers peddling antidemocratic arguments that stop short of conspiracy theorizing. Charles Geyh, a professor at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, explained that judges are sensitive to being viewed as political, and are unlikely to sanction lawyers representing the President, even if they have thin evidence [4]. The Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, known as Rule 11, forbids lawyers from bringing cases before the court for any dishonest purpose, “such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation” [5]. The American Bar Association prohibits lawyers from “bring[ing] or defend[ing] a proceeding” unless “there is a basis in law and fact for doing so” [6]. Yet when politics are brought into the fray, judges and the bar alike are less likely to penalize lawyers who do just that: argue cases that cause unnecessary delay, skirting sound legal argumentation to serve partisan ends. These lawyers, authorized by the bar to practice law, are seemingly impervious to its own rules. Lawmakers who propose shocking extralegal procedures are not the only ones who can sacrifice the law for politics; trial lawyers who are subject to Rule 11 and the ABA’s policies can, too. The systems meant to keep lawyers honest often lack the language for doing so when those lawyers represent powerful politicians, or are powerful politicians themselves.
​

State associations’ refusal to disbar Cruz and Hawley raises questions as to whether disbarment processes built for obvious legal threats are able to respond to subtle ones. The senators from Texas and Missouri saw the best legal argument for their client—the President—and acted on it, to the detriment of the rule of law. Their objections were based on sentiment among Trump’s base, not careful legal rationale. They sought to circumvent election law after the President lost, a remedy laughably disproportionate to their evidence. Given the choice between following the law and scoring political points, they chose the latter. As a result, Cruz and Hawley sublimated dangerous conspiracy theories into ordinary legal processes, a maneuver too banal for the bar to care but far too destructive to be let lay. The senators’ challenge to the integrity of the law was so fundamental as to exceed the scope of the disbarment process. The state associations know that disbarring the senators would mean revamping their rules entirely; they would have to combat unprecedented challenges to the legal system coming from the floor of the United States Senate. Expanding the bar’s criteria for disbarment would mean having hard conversations about which unmerited arguments threaten our democracy too fundamentally to be entertained. But should state bar associations refuse to disbar lawyers who go through legal avenues to undermine democratic institutions, they would be acknowledging that lawyers are hired guns for powerful politicians—readily available to turn their legal prowess on the legal system itself. Determining if lawyerly independence is worth litigating democracy requires the bar to do more than examine its past procedures. It must seriously consider the future of those procedures in a rapidly changing political environment—one in which furthering partisan goals and following the law is increasingly a zero-sum game.

[1] Muaroni, Angelica. “Thousands of lawyers and law students petition to disbar US Senators Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz.” (14 January 2021). Jurist Legal News & Commentary. https:// www.jurist.org/news/2021/01/thousands-of-lawyers-and-law-students-petition-to-disbar-us-senators-josh-hawley-and-ted-cruz/.
[2] “Joint Statement from Senators Cruz, Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Braun, Senators-Elect Lummis, Marshall, Hagerty, Tuberville.” (2 January 2021). U.S. Senator Ted Cruz. https://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=5541.
[3] Stone, Peter. “Lawyers face fallout from fueling Trump’s false claims of election fraud.” (13 January 2021). The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2021/jan/13/donald- trump-lawyers-fallout-election-fraud-claims. 
[4] Olivia Rubin and Matthew Mosk. “As lawyers keep pushing Trump election challenges, calls for sanctions mount.” (5 December 2020). ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ lawyers-pushing-trump-election-challenges-calls-sanctions-mount/story?id=74544823.
[5] “Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions.” Cornell Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/ frcp/rule_11.
[6] “Rule 3.1.” (10 April 2020). American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/ groups/professional_responsibility/policy/ethics_2000_commission/e2k_rule31/.

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​