Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

The United States As a Traffic-Light: How Redlining Divides the Country and Diminishes Education Equality

11/9/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Alicia Augustin 
​
​Alicia Augustin is a first-year student at the University of Pennsylvania’s College of Arts and Sciences who plans to study Political Science and Urban Education. 
​

The practice of redlining in the United States has added another dimension to the division of the country in a systematic way. This system not only creates this idea of desirable vs. undesirable areas to live in, but it also actively aids in perpetuating the inequalities that exist within these divisions. The roots of redlining can be traced back to the Great Depression and how government officials responded to it.
With the goal of repairing the United States from the devastation brought by the Great Depression, in 1933 President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the New Deal into action. The New Deal consisted of several programs that aimed to serve three main purposes: to relieve, recover, and reform the country from the effects of the Great Depression. [1] From programs that supported economic stabilization to rural assistance programs, Roosevelt’s New Deal was shaped to ensure that Americans could receive a plethora of support from the government. [1]

The Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1933 was created to assist homeowners with financial troubles and improve the mortgage industry [2]. This act led to the creation of the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), an organization meant to execute this act by providing emergency loans and relief to homeowners. [3] HOLC practiced redlining, which is the dividing of neighborhoods into color-coded areas so that “desirable” areas would be distinguished from “hazardous” areas [4]. Green areas are graded as “best”, or the most desirable, blue areas are graded as “still desirable”, yellow areas are graded as “definitely declining”, and red areas are graded as “hazardous”. [5] 

When looking at the maps that are drawn based on HOLC’s standards, many parts of the United States begin to resemble a traffic light. Red alerts loan companies to stop and avoid loaning in that area. Yellow alerts loan companies to slow down and consider loaning in that area. Neighborhoods color-coded green or blue represented good investments for the loan companies. Consequently, loan corporations will assist desirable areas, while those deemed undesirable, redlined communities are left to fend for themselves. 

Redlining seems like a sensible method of determining the best areas for loan corporations to trust. Handing out loans requires a high degree of trust since loan corporations are expecting their money back eventually. Unfortunately, when areas of the United States are redlined, the criteria behind determining what makes an area “desirable” consider demographic factors, like race. [4] Therefore, high concentrations of minorities in a community decrease the value of the area. For example, low-income African-American families could be highly concentrated in an area and it would be perceived as undesirable by banks and loan companies. 

The impact that redlining has on education inequality becomes apparent when looking at how schooling is linked to housing. [4] Areas where houses are worth more typically house residents with higher incomes. [4] The Joint Economic Committee (JEC) finds that the U.S. zip code areas that contain the best schools also have houses where the average price is nearly $500,000. [4] JEC also finds that areas, where there are poor quality schools, have houses where the average price is about $125,000. [4] This is a large gap that displays the disproportion in income in different areas and how better schools are accessible in expensive areas. A report by the Department of Education showed how the richest school districts spent on average about $1,500 more per student than poorer schools. [6] Based on redlined maps, areas that are high-income or more desirable will typically have significantly better-funded schools.

Many may question why students in less desirable areas would not just go to school in the better areas. The answer is that students face more restrictions that limit their opportunity to attain proper education. Coined “education redlining” by Tim DeRoche, this limitation on education attainment is due to mapping enforced by school district lines and attendance zones. [4]

School district boundaries create geographic boundaries that allow for funding to be distributed in different ways. [4] For example, school district A is bound to a more desirable neighborhood and receives more funding while school district B, which is in an undesirable area, receives less funding. Funding is important in schooling because it allows for access to better resources such as technology. Attendance zone boundaries are the lines that exist within school districts to assign students to certain schools according to where they live. [4] These boundaries are problematic because not only are students already restricted to a school district, but they are also forced to attend a school that school district officials decide. They are not given the freedom to choose where they could attain the best education. 

These boundaries are often drawn with discriminatory motives. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), held that the “separate but equal” doctrine violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, further deciding that public school segregation was unconstitutional. [7] This case outlawed racial segregation allowing for integrated schools. Before, race could prevent a child from attending a school they wanted. Many who were angered by this sought creative ways to avoid adhering to these new laws. Redlining in education became a legal way to reinforce segregation in schools. 
School districts with a majority of  white children receive $23 billion more funding than school districts with predominantly black children. [8] This disparity explains the lack of resources provided to schools with black children, ultimately leading to inequalities in education between black and white children. 

In an attempt to mitigate the implications of redlining on education, there are many nonprofit organizations and interest groups that focus on combating inequalities in the education system. Teaching Matters is a nonprofit organization committed to this cause by placing an emphasis on supporting teachers and educators. [8] Teaching Matters believes that having access to better teachers will improve equity in education. [9] The connection between better teachers and redlining is that areas deemed desirable are likely to pay teachers more, while areas deemed undesirable simply cannot afford it. As a result, “better” teachers will teach in desirable areas, leaving undesirable areas with less funding and higher populations of minorities without the same access to high-quality education. 

By donating to nonprofit organizations, citizens can help invest in education. Investments in the education system can help narrow the equality gap in education. Additionally, time investment into these organizations through volunteer work is a great way to support them  more directly.
​

Redlining has historically been an integral part of public education in the United States, similar to the necessity of a traffic light in regulating traffic. Redlining is a difficult system to get rid of since it is so deeply embedded in the country. Education nonprofit organizations push for a focus on improving factors of education (improving teachers, resources, curricula, etc.) as the primary solution. Children deserve fair education no matter where they live, and redlining deprives them of proper educational attainment. 
​
[1] “What Was the New Deal?: Oklahoma Historical Society.” Oklahoma Historical Society | OHS. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://www.okhistory.org/learn/depression3. 
[2] “New Deal Programs.” Living New Deal, October 18, 2022. https://livingnewdeal.org/what-was-the-new-deal/programs/.
[3] Congress, United States. “Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933.” FRASER, June 13, 1933. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/home-owners-loan-act-1933-850. 
[4] Burke, Lindsey. “Housing Redlining and Its Lingering Effects on Education Opportunity.” The Heritage Foundation. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://www.heritage.org/education/report/housing-redlining-and-its-lingering-effects-education-opportunity. 
[5] “Mapping Inequality.” Digital Scholarship Lab. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redlining/#loc=11/40.015/-75.238&mapview=graded&city=philadelphia-pa. 
[6] Barshay, Jill. “A Decade of Research on Education Inequality in America.” The Hechinger Report, June 29, 2020. https://hechingerreport.org/a-decade-of-research-on-the-rich-poor-divide-in-education/. 
[7] “Brown v. Board of Education .” Accessed November 3, 2022. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/347us483. 
[8] Guastaferro, Lynette. “Why Racial Inequities in America's Schools Are Rooted in Housing Policies of the Past.” USA Today.Gannett Satellite Information Network, November 2, 2020. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/11/02/how-redlining-still-hurts-black-latino-students-public-schools-column/6083342002/. 
[9] “Homepage.” Teaching Matters, September 20, 2022. https://www.teachingmatters.org/. 

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​