Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

The United States and the International Criminal Court At Odds, Once Again

11/29/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Connor Gallagher
Connor Gallagher is a sophomore at the University of Pennsylvania studying Chemical Engineering.


On November 3rd, the top prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Gambian Fatou Bensouda, announced that she is seeking to investigate the United States Armed  Forces  and the CIA for war crimes committed during the War in Afghanistan from 2003 to as recently  as 2014. [1] One year ago, Bensouda released a report claiming that “members of the US armed forces appear to have subjected at least 61 detained persons to torture, cruel treatment, [and] outrages upon personal dignity on the territory of Afghanistan” and that “members of the CIA appear to have subjected at least 27 detained persons” to the same crimes, as well as “rape on the territory of Afghanistan and other States Parties,” including Poland, Romania, and Lithuania. [2]

As with any international organization, there are serious questions as to whether the International Criminal Court does in fact have jurisdiction over the American agents under investigation.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) derives its authority from a treaty known as the Rome Statute. [3] Adopted in 1998 and entered into force in 2002, the Rome Statute grants the ICC power to investigate and prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. The last crime is defined to be “the use of armed force by a state against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another state, or in any manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.” [4]

The ICC is adamant in its literature that it is not designed to replace national judicial systems. The Rome Statute explicitly dictates that the ICC is not permitted to investigate and prosecute cases “unless the State [which has jurisdiction over it] is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution.” [5] Accordingly, the ICC believes its mission is  to “put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of the most serious crimes” in cases where a State Party cannot or will not prosecute. [5]

However, the United States’ relationship with the ICC has been a contentious one. President Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statute on literally the last day the treaty allowed him to do so, December 31, 2000. His remarks that day did not express much commitment to the cause, but instead they featured language that has come to dominate discourse about international agreements in the United States: “With signature…we will be in a position to influence the evolution of the court. Without signature, we will not.” [6] Moreover, President Clinton urged his successor, George W. Bush, not to submit the treaty for ratification to the United States Senate, as is required by Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution. Thus, the United States remains a signatory to the Rome Statute, but not a State Party to the Court.

Such a sour relationship between the United States and the ICC has not dissuaded Bensouda from proceeding with her investigation. In fact, she defends the ICC’s involvement on the grounds that the United States has abdicated its duty to prosecute war crimes, which falls under the “unwillingness” standard conferring jurisdiction upon the ICC. Bensouda maintains that no “individual in the armed services [was] prosecuted by courts martial for the ill-treatment of detainees within the [ICC’s] temporal and territorial jurisdiction” in Afghanistan, a State Party. [7] In addition, her report finds that the Department of Justice completed investigations into only two detainees who died during CIA interrogation, neither of which returned an indictment or prosecution. [7]

American objections to the ICC fall into two primary categories. First, and particularly pressing in this new case, American leaders question the Court’s presumptive extension of jurisdiction over non-States Parties, such as the United States, for crimes committed against States Parties, such as Afghanistan. However, the United States is a member of the United Nations, which binds it to uphold certain “peace-loving” conduct with other members, and has its own laws that open perpetrators of war crimes to prosecution. [8, 9]

In other words, the United States could wholly avoid the ICC’s jurisdiction––with the ICC’s blessing––through a more substantive and transparent investigation of alleged illicit war-zone activity. On top of that, the United States is a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, which grants it powers to influence who the Court decides to prosecute. [10] The argument that the United States can justify directing the Court from the Security Council but be completely immune to that Court’s jurisdiction otherwise borders on indefensible.

Second, the United States worries that the Court does not provide constitutionally equivalent due process protections to potential American defendants. This is almost certainly the weakest argument the U.S. government can proffer, as the ICC has adopted practically the entirety of the Bill of Rights. Such protections include right to counsel, right to be informed of charges against him/her, right to adequate preparation for trial, right to a speedy trial, right against self-incrimination, right to receive any exculpatory evidence in possession of the prosecution (Brady evidence in the U.S.), right to cross-examine witnesses, a presumption of innocence, and the “reasonable doubt” burden of proof on the prosecution. [11, 12]
​
Nonetheless, the United States does share, in its rhetoric, the ideals of the ICC. In those same remarks where President Clinton offers lukewarm American support for the Court, he praises the United States’ “long history of commitment to the principle of accountability, from our involvement in the Nuremberg tribunals…to our leadership in the effort to establish the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.” He continued to describe the crimes over which the ICC has jurisdiction as “the most heinous abuses that result from international conflict” and “reaffirm[ed]” the United States’ “strong support…for bringing to justice perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.” [6]

Yes, the United States stands eloquently opposed to genocide and crimes against humanity, but with the precondition that it not be held to its own moral standards. The United States wants accountability for foreign terrorists but no due process, and due process for its military and intelligence agents but no accountability. I consider this disparity to be an affront to American ideals, no matter how vile or honorable the cause of a defendant. If the United States does actually adhere to its self-proclaimed values, it should welcome the jurisdiction of a court that reinforces those values with nothing to fear.

1. Rick Gladstone and Marlise Simons, “Hague Prosecutor Seeks to Pursue Afghan Case That Could Ensnare Americans,” The New York Times, November 3, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/world/asia/international-criminal-court-afghanistan-united-states.html.
2. “Report on Preliminary Examination Activities 2016,” The Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Court, November 14, 2016, at 47. https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/otp/161114-otp-rep-PE_ENG.pdf.
3. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, effective July 1, 2002. https://www.icc-cpi.int/nr/rdonlyres/ea9aeff7-5752-4f84-be94-0a655eb30e16/0/rome_statute_english.pdf.
4. “Crime of aggression,” International Crimes Database Project, 2013. http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Crimes/CrimeOfAggression.
5. “Understanding the International Criminal Court,” International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/PIDS/publications/UICCEng.pdf.
6. “Clinton’s Statement on War Crimes Court,” BBC News, December 31, 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1095580.stm.
7. “Report,” supra n. 2, at 49.
8. United Nations Charter, Article 4. http://www.un.org/en/charter-united-nations/.
9. Theresa Young Reeves, “A Global Court? U.S. Objections to the International Criminal Court and Obstacles to Ratification,” Human Rights Brief, 2000. http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1472&context=hrbrief.
10. Rome Statute, supra n. 3, Articles 13(b) and 16.
11. Ibid.
12. Rome Statute, supra n. 3, Article 67.
​Photo Credit: Flickr User/United Nations Photo www.flickr.com/photos/un_photo/


The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​