Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

The People, the Law and the State - A brief theoretical exploration

4/17/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Kelly Liang
​Kelly Liang is a Sophomore studying Mathematics and Political Theory in the College of Arts and Sciences. 


Lex est quod populus iubet atque constituit - The law is what the people have agreed to and established [1]. This quote of Gaius, a celebrated Roman jurist, describes the source of power of laws, and can be further extended to understand the relation among the People (also the Citizens or the Nationals), the Law, and the State. A further dissection of the quote would lead us to the natural conclusion of a power circuit that works like the children’s game “Paper, Scissors, Rock”: 1) The People gives power to the Law by consents; 2) The Law constructs the State and gives the State power - especially in the case of constitutional government; and finally, 3) the State can use the power to govern the people and execute the Law.
While this model treats the State and the Law separately, the two are actually much entangled in real life. For instance, the Supreme Court in the United States is often described as part of the national coalition of government and sometimes seen as the protector of government institutions, while also having to perform its “Checks and Balances” role because of the principle of Separation of Powers. In Ancient Rome, however, this relation between the Law and the State was much more separated. The Roman Republic was a constitutional republic and the Law was the sole basis of power of the State [2]. While it is hardly appropriate to compare present-day United States to the Roman Republic, the discussion of the Law’s function in the State, as well as the extension of such discussion to the power of people in the State, would still be fruitful. The differences in political structures do not obstruct the discussion of the origin of the State, as this is not a contest of the better form of governance. Rather, it is a discussion of something that is common for all States - self-pronounced or otherwise. Until we can understand the relationship of the different forces in an organic model of government, we may then advance our experience as citizens of a State.

In Cicero’s well-known discussion of the origin of the State in Republic, he stated that all States can, and must, only use their executive power, in the name of a binding standard of regular procedures [3]. In a simpler way: lex [est] civilis societatis vinculum - the law is what holds the society together [4]. This is because a government is acceptable only “if it secures the bond [of law] which first joined men together in the partnership of the commonwealth,” [5]. This passage further shows how the notion of the State is closely associated with Law for the Romans, because the law of the State would be legitimate. Cicero’s statement provides support for the argument of Gaius, especially in 2) of the circuit (see paragraph one), which the essay attempts to draw attention to. While Cicero’s quote seems to capture the essence of the origin of the State, it is not free from debate and criticism. Scholars have debated the meaning of lex in the context of Cicero’s Republic, specifically whether it is taking into account only just laws, or mere consent of laws. This essay will not delve into the matter of interpretation here, but one thing for certain is the absolute emphasis of the element of law, the quality of the matter aside. It is precisely because of this, that the State is not reduced into the pure phenomenon of force, but a structured power for exercising within a framework.

The remaining task now is to show how the law originated from the people. We may now go to the thought experiment of Hobbes in his work Leviathan. In the book, Hobbes famously described the State of Nature as an anarchy with the worst conditions to live in: “with continual fear, and the danger of violent death,” [6]. It is in such an environment, that the ideas of the Law of Nature emerge among the people. Hobbes proposed that fundamental laws concerning safety, liberties and properties, etc, would emerge among the people in the State of Nature. These fundamental laws, or moral codes, as most scholars contends, can be seen as the first few laws that emerge when humans attempt to organise themselves into a structured community. However, these fundamental laws would be mere thoughts if people could not reach a consensus to these rules and agree to act in accordance with them. The law can only have force and maintain itself if people agree to let it have force. In other words, the source of power of the law is people’s consent. This completes the proof for the first step of our power circuit, as stated in the introductory paragraph.

While the theoretical talk of the ideals of Cicero and Hobbes may seem irrelevant in modern day politics, some scholars are actually advocating for the revival of some of the principles of classics in today’s society. One example of that would be scholars proposing to give the power of interpretation of the Constitution from the Supreme Court to the people in the United States. Proposed by law scholar Mark Tushnet, it is an idea against judicial (branch) supremacy [7]. Proponents of Tushnet’s ideas are aligned with the dynamics this essay has proposed: the people gives the law power, and the power of interpretation of the constitution should return to the people. While this idea is theoretically sound, the implementation faces grave difficulty, as the government emerges as the more powerful contender in the competition of power with the people. Therefore, the power circuit might have been destroyed by the establishment of powerful institutions, and there seems to be a reversed power circuit in the making.

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

References
[1] D’Entrèves, Alexander Passerin. The Notion of State, 76-77. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1967
[2] Lakoff, Sanford A. “Plural Autonomy: Roman and Later Republicanism” in Democracy: History, Theory, Practice. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1996
[3] D’Entrèves, Alexander Passerin. The Notion of State, 80-81. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1967
[4] ibid
[5] ibid
[6] Hobbes, Thomas, and E. M Curley. Leviathan: With Selected Variants From the Latin Edition of 1668, 186. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 1994.
[7] Tushnet, Mark V., Taking the Constitution Away From the Courts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999.
Photo Credit: Christie Blatchford 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​