Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

The Nonprofit Status: Universities and the Nonprofit Problem

4/10/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Dan Spinelli

Dan Spinelli is a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania studying Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE).

From 1958 to 1970, Philadelphia’s professional football team, the Eagles, played its games at Franklin Field on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania. The stadium, which could hold a maximum capacity of 60,658 fans at the time, hosted legendary games, including the 1960 NFL Championship (the precursor to the Super Bowl), in which the underdog Eagles beat the Green Bay Packers, coached by the legendary Vince Lombardi. So how much did this NFL team pay Penn to use their facilities?

Well...they didn’t.

According to The Eagles Encyclopedia, a history of the football franchise, “The Eagles did not pay rent for use of the stadium because of the nonprofit status of the university.” [1] In a deal practically unthinkable now, Penn only collected parking and concession revenues and let the Eagles keep the rest of the game day haul. While the team donated between $75,000 to $1000,000 for “maintenance and other expenses,” the donations were certainly not one-­for­-one deals for Penn. In Such an arrangement would be inconceivable in today’s era of nonprofit 
institutions with multibillion-­dollar endowments and hundreds of acres of real estate. Nearly seventy years ago, however, the philosophy underpinning nonprofit entities was very different.

Today, wealthy universities like Penn regularly run a yearly profit. According to a report from the Institute for Research on Poverty, nonprofit institutions “are restricted not in how much income they can generate, but rather in how it is distributed.” [2] Profits must be allocated in 
ways that “serve the tax­-exempt purpose of the organization.” With research universities like Penn, money devoted to research clearly serves a public purpose. However, added funds for real estate and admissions brochures sent to legions of prospective students also work toward the 
university’s purpose of attracting students and strengthening its brand name. For such nonprofits, the name itself is misleading: the profit­-motive may be gone, but profits are surely not.

More troubling is the flexible way nonprofits define their “public purpose.” After the passage of the Sixteenth Amendment paved the way for the federal income tax, Congress excluded “any corporation or association organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, or educational purposes.” [3] Even in its early days, this exemption was criticized for its lack of specificity. Various kinds of nonprofits were “lumped together and exempted from tax as though fungible members of an undifferentiated mass.” [4] Vague laws breed broad laws, and soon nonprofit institutions began modeling for­-profit corporations in almost uncanny ways. New York Magazine describes Harvard University as little more than a “real estate and hedge fund concern that happens to have a college attached.” [5]

The sprawling reach of today’s nonprofits has provoked more than a few concerns about their actual interests in the public welfare. As a university located in a large city, the University of Pennsylvania has come under strong criticism for not paying property taxes for its one thousand-acre campus. Because property taxes generally fund the local school district, and Philadelphia’s 1 notoriously underfunded district is currently running an $80 million deficit, Penn’s nonprofit status has been thoroughly scrutinized, with student protesters calling on University 
administrators to make voluntary payments to the city. [6] These payments in lieu of taxes, or PILOTs, are frequently requested of large universities. Penn, which made annual contributions of $1.93 million to Philadelphia from 1995­-2000, has outwardly rejected overtures by 
Philadelphia’s City Council for a new PILOTs agreement. [8] Whether or not Penn should make these voluntary payments is irrelevant — the controversy underlying its presence in civil discourse is evidence enough of dissatisfaction with huge nonprofit institutions.

So, where does the public distrust of large nonprofits leave us? Legislators are left to sift between public disapproval and protest or attempt to simplify the tax code, hardly an enviable task. To their credit, some state governments are up to the task of reform. In Pennsylvania, the state Supreme Court generally determines which organizations qualify as a “purely public charity.” However, the State Senate just approved a proposed constitutional amendment, which would allow the legislature itself to write standards for tax-­exemption. [9] The proposal is now up for a vote in the Pennsylvania General Assembly. With the Assembly’s approval, the proposed amendment can be sent directly to the voters for an “up or down” vote at the polls. While observers see little chance of such an amendment reaching voters, it has certainly sent a jolt to organizations like Penn that preciously covet their tax-­exempt status. Within seventy years, Penn has gone from an institution that forwent thousands of dollars in revenue to lease its football field to the Eagles to one that now operates like a for­-profit corporation. Only time can tell what seventy more years will do.  

[1] Didinger, Ray, and Robert S. Lyons. The Eagles Encyclopedia. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 2005. Print.
[2] Weisbrod, Burton Allen. The Nonprofit Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1988. Print.
[3] Thorndike, Joseph. "Why Did Congress Exempt Social Welfare Organizations?" Tax History Project. Tax Analysts, 13 June 2013. Web. 30 Mar. 2015. <http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/readings.nsf/ArtWeb/CFFB1CE42BEFA8B285257BE400723DF8?OpenDocument>.
[4] Boris I. Bittker and George K. Rahdert, "The Exemption of Nonprofit Organizations From Federal Income Taxation," 85 Yale L.J. 301 (1976).
[5] Lowrey, Annie. "Take Away Harvard's Nonprofit Status." Daily Intelligencer. New York Magazine, 09 Sept. 2014. Web. 30 Mar. 2015. 
<http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/09/take­away­harvards­nonprofit­status.html>.
[6] Graham, Kristen. "Phila. School's Latest Budget Forecasts $80 Million Deficit." Philly.com.  The Philadelphia Inquirer, 11 Feb. 2015. Web. 30 Mar. 2015. <http://articles.philly.com/2015­02­11/news/59010283_1_charter­schools­houstoun­district­run­schools>.2
[7] Spinelli, Dan. “PILOTs resolution passes City Council vote, U. holds firm.” TheDP.com. The Daily Pennsylvanian. 26 Mar. 2015. Web. 30 Mar. 2015. < http://www.thedp.com/article/2015/03/pilots­resolution­passes­city­council>
[8] Alexandersen, Christian. "Constitutional Amendment for Nonprofit Tax­exemptions Passes the Pa. Senate, Goes to House." PennLive. Advance Digital, 17 Feb. 2015. Web. <http://www.pennlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/02/constitutional_amendment_for_n.html>.

Photo Credit: Flickr user Lawrence OP
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​