Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

The Evolution of Environmental Activism and the Law from 1965 to 2021

3/24/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
“Demonstration London Demo - Free Photo on Pixabay.” Accessed March 24, 2022. https://pixabay.com/photos/demonstration-london-demo-activist-4193109/.
By Rachel Bina

Rachel Bina is a freshman in the Huntsman Program at the University of Pennsylvania studying Business and International Studies with a focus on Russia.


The idea of environmental activism is commonplace in the present-day United States, however, this was not always the case. American environmental activism only truly began in the 1960s, when American citizens started using litigation to advance environmental goals. The 1965 case Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission is widely recognized as the beginning of environmental law. In this case, the Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, a citizen group, sued the Federal Power Commision in an attempt to block a planned power plant on Storm King Mountain, New York [1]. The court’s decision supported the citizen group and the power plant was not built.
Since then, a trend of citizen-led environmental litigation has continued with other landmark cases such as the 1972 Supreme Court case Sierra Club v. Morton. Walt Disney Enterprises was attempting to construct a ski resort at Mineral King Valley in California and the environmentalist group the Sierra Club objected to their permit application [2]. Although the Supreme Court rejected the suit, this decision catalyzed further action, and Mineral King Valley was never developed.

This trend of environmental legal activism moved simultaneously along with the more general environmental movement in the United States, which began with the publication of Silent Spring by Rachel Carson in 1962. During that decade, pollution was rampant and there were numerous environmental disasters such as the spontaneous combustion of the Cuyahoga River in Ohio due to the river’s great amount of debris and pollution [3]. As a result of the dire ecological situation exemplified by the Cuyahoga River Fire and the growing push for change, President Nixon signed an executive order to form the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970 to regulate environmental matters, ushering in a new wave of environmental litigation. The EPA regulates many aspects of the environment, such as pollution. In the 2007 Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. The Environmental Protection Agency, Massachusetts and several other states and environmental organizations sued the EPA after the agency denied a petition asking them to regulate pollutants from motor vehicles that contribute to global warming. The Supreme Court ruled that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases and must do so if these pollutants are endangering the public [4].

This case is again coming to the forefront of environmental policy because of an upcoming challenge to the ruling. In the case West Virginia v. The Environmental Protection Agency, West Virginia is suing the EPA, alleging that the EPA’s 2015 Clean Power Plan—which was the first national regulation standard of greenhouse gas emissions from power plants—is beyond the authority of the EPA. The case is currently being argued before the Supreme Court, and poses a possible setback to the Biden Administration’s climate agenda. 

One of Biden’s most ambitious goals is his climate agenda, which follows a three pronged approach. By (1) implementing tax incentives for clean energy, (2) imposing tougher regulations for pollution from power plants and automobiles, and (3) having states pass clean energy laws, the Biden Administration hopes to be able to meet their goal of a carbon-neutral nation by 2050.

The enactment of tougher pollution regulations will be done through EPA regulations that impose strict mandates on fuel efficiency and emissions standards for automobiles [5]. In the case, West Virginia is attempting to argue that under non-delegation doctrine, the Constitution does not give Congress the ability to delegate regulatory power to the EPA in the context of regulating pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions [6]. 

If West Virginia wins this case, the regulatory powers of the EPA will be severely limited, and Biden’s climate plan may begin to fall apart. However, at the same time, a ruling in West Virginia’s favor may open up new avenues for litigation to control pollutants. In the case American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court ruled that private parties cannot sue to curb emissions because this type of action is exclusively delegated to the EPA under the Clean Air Act [7]. However, if the EPA no longer wields the same regulatory powers as before, this decision may change and private parties may start suing companies to force them to curb their emissions instead.
The largest impact of a possible ruling in West Virginia’s favor is a severe limit to the ability of the EPA to regulate environmental matters and force all environmental regulation to move through Congress. As a result, legislation would move extremely slowly and be unable to be implemented efficiently and changed in response to new research. On a grander scale, this ruling would have global ramifications, setting the US back in its attempt to attain global emission goals from the Paris and Glasgow climate summits. Private litigation would once again be able to proceed to sue companies for pollution. However, the possible gains of these suits are miniscule compared to the loss of having the EPA as a regulatory body, and the loss of American credibility in promoting environmental policies internationally.
The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
​

1. “Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power,” Justia, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/407/926/.
2. “Sierra Club v. Morton,” Oyez, https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-34.
3. “Cuyahoga River Fire,” Ohio History Central, http://ohiohistorycentral.org/w/Cuyahoga_River_Fire.
4. “Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency,” Ballotpedia, https://ballotpedia.org/Massachusetts_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency.
5. “Biden Proposes Stronger Than Expected Vehicle Emission Rules (1),” Bloomberg Law, Aug. 5, 2021, https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/biden-epa-proposes-stronger- than-expected-vehicle-emission-rules.
6. “West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency,” Ballotpedia, https://ballotpedia.org/West_Virginia_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency.
7. “American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut,” Oyez, https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010/10-174.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​