Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

The Current State of Nationwide Injunctions

4/7/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Nicholas Williams
Nicholas Williams is a freshman in the College of Arts and Sciences planning on majoring in Political Science.
​The current federal court system was created by the Judiciary Act of 1789. The law created three levels of federal courts: district courts, circuit (or appellate) courts, and the Supreme Court [1]. Today, there are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme Court [2], all with the power to issue injunctions - an order that stops a party from continuing a certain action, or, sometimes in the case of the federal government, enforcing a certain policy.
Generally, the decision of a district court judge only applies to the parties in the case [3],  which allows the appeals process to continue without larger changes in the enforcement of federal laws and policies. In the case that a citizen sues the federal government claiming that a law or policy is unconstitutional, a judge can issue an injunction saying that the government cannot enforce said law or policy against the plaintiff. However, judges can also issue nationwide injunctions. In the case that a judge grants a nationwide injunction against the federal government when deeming a policy or law to be unconstitutional, such a ruling entirely prohibits the government from enforcing it. The ruling would thus apply nationwide, as opposed to only applying to the parties in the specific case.

Nationwide injunctions have been occurring with increasing frequency. Although there is no universal agreement as to when the first nationwide injunction was issued, legal scholars do seem to agree that the first nationwide injunction did not occur until the 20th century [4]. Furthermore, there has been a spike in nationwide injunctions under the administration of President Donald Trump. According to Time magazine, as of November 4, 2019, 42 nationwide injunctions had been issued during Mr. Trump’s presidency [5], whereas only 20 nationwide injunctions were issued during former President Barack Obama’s presidency.

The increase in nationwide injunctions has led to a debate among both legal scholars and politicians alike, with many conservatives criticizing their use. The latter argue that they give too much power to a single district court judge and make it harder for the executive branch to enforce policies [6]. Indeed, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, generally seen as one of the most conservative justices on the Court, if not the most conservative, has publicly argued against their use [7]. In Trump v. Hawaii (2018), in a concurring opinion, Thomas argued that a congressional statute is needed to allow judges to issue nationwide injunctions, and even then, their use may still grant judges a large amount of power that is not consistent with Article III of the Constitution. He also argued that nationwide injunctions encourage plaintiffs to find judges who are sympathetic to their cause, as said judge has the full power to halt enforcement of a law or policy that the plaintiff dislikes, without any additional support.

One consequence of the rise in nationwide injunctions is that the federal government has increasingly been asking the Supreme Court for emergency relief after district court judges issue nationwide injunctions. When the Court grants such a request, it lifts the nationwide injunction while allowing the case to play out among the lower courts. The rise of nationwide injunctions during Mr. Trump’s presidency is correlated with an increasing number of requests by the solicitor general for the Supreme Court to grant immediate relief from nationwide injunctions [8], seemingly because the Trump administration sees the Supreme Court as more sympathetic to its policies than many district court judges are. In other cases, the Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to issue and decide the legality of an opinion after the district court judge issues an opinion, skipping the circuit courts altogether.

Some may wonder why a judge would not immediately halt the enforcement of a law or executive policy that she found unconstitutional. Two recent cases at the district court level, in which the judges opted to not issue nationwide injunctions, show why their use can be problematic. In National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, a judge in the Southern District of Texas found that the all-male draft is unconstitutional [9]. However, the judge only issued an opinion stating that he found it to be unconstitutional, without ordering the Selective Service to cease enforcement of the all-male draft. If a nationwide injunction had been issued, then the Selective Service either would have had to stop compelling men to register for the Selective Service or require women to do so as well. The case is currently pending before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals [10].

In a separate case, Texas v. United States, a judge in the Northern District of Texas ruled that the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, is unconstitutional [11]. Rather than issue an immediate nationwide injunction, thus creating a state of chaos in health insurance markets, the judge decided to allow the law to continue to be enforced. The case is currently before the same judge, after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that the individual mandate is now unconstitutional, but remanded the case back to the district court to decide whether all of the law needed to be invalidated [12]. Overall, nationwide injunctions seem to be the result of America’s current hyper-polarized politics. Indeed, as Lee Durtman argues in The Atlantic, divides between the president and Congress today do not lead to compromise, as the Founders intended, but rather “congressional stonewalling” and increased “executive authority [13].” Because an increasing amount of policy is formulated by the executive branch, opponents of such policy take their case to the courts to try to stop its implementation. As more policy is contested in the court system, judges have had more opportunities to issue nationwide injunctions against the federal government, and many have clearly been taking that opportunity.

Clarity on the issue of nationwide injunctions could come from Congress, in the form of a statute or constitutional amendment either expressly permitting or forbidding the issuance of nationwide injunctions, but this seems unlikely. For now, it seems like the legal system will have to continue to adjust to the increase in nationwide injunctions, with lawyers opposed to executive policies constantly trying to block their implementation in lower courts. This is the new reality, even if the 1st Congress did not foresee the rise and proliferation of nationwide injunctions when writing the Judiciary Act of 1789.

​​​​​The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
References
[1] “Judiciary Act of 1789.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Judiciary-Act-of-1789
[2] “Introduction To The Federal Court System.” United States Department of Justice. Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.justice.gov/usao/justice-101/federal-courts
[3] Jeffrey, Rosen. “When Should Judges Issue Nationwide Injunctions.” National Constitution Center. Accessed February 13, 2020. https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/podcast/when-should-judges-issue-nationwide-injunctions
[4] Frost, Amanda. “Academic highlight: The debate over nationwide injunctions.” SCOTUSblog. Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.scotusblog.com/2018/02/academic-highlight-debate-nationwide-injunctions/
[5] Berenson, Tessa. “Inside the Trump Administration’s Fight to End Nationwide Injunctions.” Time Magazine. Accessed February 13, 2020. https://time.com/5717541/nationwide-injunctions-trump-administration/
[6] “Nationwide Injunctions from District Courts.” Senate Republican Policy Committee. Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.rpc.senate.gov/policy-papers/nationwide-injunctions-from-district-courts
[7] Trump v. Hawaii, 585 U.S. 138 (2018). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-965_h315.pdf
[8] de Vogue, Ariane. “The Supreme Court, nationwide injunctions and leap frogging the lower courts.” CNN. Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/13/politics/supreme-court-nationwide-injunctions/index.html
[9] National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, 4:16-cv-03362 (S.D. Tex. 2019). https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5747780-190224-SELECTIVE-SERVICE-DECISION-Full.html
[10] CIRCUIT COURT CASE National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, No. 19-10011 (5th Cir. 2020). http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/clerk/calendar/2003/32.tul.htm
[11] CIRCUIT COURT CASE Texas v. United States, 4:18-cv-00167 (N.D. Tex. 2018). https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5629711-Texas-v-US-Partial-Summary-Judgment.html
[12] Luthi, Susannah. “Supreme Court won’t fast-track Obamacare case.” Politico. Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/21/supreme-court-wont-review-obamacare-lawsuit-before-the-election-101356
[13] Drutman, Lee. “America Is Now the Divided Republic the Framers Feared.” The Atlantic. Accessed February 25, 2020. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/01/two-party-system-broke-constitution/604213/

Photo by Claire Anderson on Unsplash
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​