Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Sovereignty through Occupation: A study with a focus on the annexation of Tibet

7/29/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Nikhil Mahadeva
Nikhil Mahadeva is a fourth year B.A./LL.B. (Hons.) student at the National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi.

Sovereignty, in its simplest understanding, implies an ultimate authority over something, usually some form of polity. Nowadays, it is a term used to describe the independence and autonomy of states, i.e. the right of each state to decide its own affairs. This ultimate authority is said to derive from the people that form that state. In this regard, international law forbids nations from interfering with the sovereign matters of other nations [1].  This concept is complemented by the principle of self-determination, which is the right of people to choose who or what governs them. However, this element of choice does not always lend itself to the recognition of sovereignty. So how does one determine its sovereignty?
​
Sovereignty can be legitimately acquired by accretion, cession, conquest, effective occupation and prescription. This list excludes less legitimate methods, such as outright annexation. When considering ‘occupation’ as a prerequisite, two of these methods come to mind.
Effective occupation occurs when someone stakes a claim to something heretofore unclaimed. In judicial terms, it is a display of authority over the territory in question, on a continuous, peaceful basis [2]. Conquest is simply where a state takes over a territory by force, with little concern for other factors, and exercises its authority over it. At present this is not permitted in international law by virtue of the 1907 Hague Convention and the UN Charter, among other cautionary statutes [3].

However, incidents of conquest are not infrequent. It is just done less openly and justified to the world through political exercise (such as Saddam Hussein insisting on Iraq’s historical claim to Kuwait or the Crimean Referendum). In most of these cases, there is an active resistance to these actions not only from those who are ‘conquered’ but also from the world community [4].

An excellent, albeit overlooked, example is the case of Tibet. Tibet was, as maintained by its people and its leader the Dalai Lama, an independent state. However, following World War 2 and consolidation of power under Chairman Mao Zedong, China set its sights on Tibet, arguing that it was historically controlled by Chinese dynasties between the 13th and 14th century, as well as between the 18th and 20th centuries [5].  While the relationship between these dynasties and Tibet is debated (with no particular side having stronger evidence), it is undisputed that China’s control ended in 1911 and Tibet was independent of Chinese influence until 1951 [6]. China engaged in negotiations with the then Tibetan government, a process which failed when Tibet asserted their independence. China then attacked Tibet, fighting the Battle of Chamdo in 1950, in order to pressure Tibet into ceding. This tactic succeeded, and Tibet signed the Seventeen-Point Agreement, which effectively signed over their sovereignty to China.

This raises the end question: can sovereignty be bought in such a manner, and is occupation and control sufficient to consolidate it?

International law makes annexation as a whole illegal, under the same documents that outlaw conquest. Taking into account the Tibetan stance that the Seventeen-Point Agreement was signed under duress, it would only make China’s position in Tibet one of military occupation.

The law of military occupation recognizes the notion of a ‘temporary sovereign’ in the form of the occupying force. It does not, however, grant that force any form of permanent legitimacy; the occupier is a placeholder, seemingly justified in order to prevent anarchy. The law considers the continuance of the ousted sovereign’s government, along with the resistance of its citizens, as an example of the continuing sovereignty of the nation [7].

However, it is difficult to say that this right is timeless. Where the occupier is inclined to keep its role temporary, and where other states refuse to recognize them, perhaps it is fair to say it persists indefinitely; so long as there is resistance. Despite this, the ousted sovereign’s rights are theoretical until they can enforce them against a presumably militarily superior occupier. At some point the distinction between occupier and legitimate authority begins to blur. It is perhaps best to say then, that the ousted sovereign has a theoretical right in persistence, but the fact remains that the occupier exerts their authority and takes on the position of sovereign for so long as the occupation continues.

In the case of Tibet, there exists an active government in exile and the people of Tibet have resisted in both armed and peaceful manners, as well as in ways such as self-immolation [8][9][10][11]. The unfortunate reality remains that a large part of the world has forgotten about the plight of this mountainous nation over the past 67 years, with few willing to challenge China over the issue. This is reflective of a larger concern in international law and diplomacy: might and political power remain the true ‘ultimate authority’, and while Tibet may still have a legal claim at independence, their sovereignty has, for all intents and purposes, been effectively taken over by China by virtue of their occupation. 

[1] U.N. Charter art. 2, ¶ 4
[2] Hanish Islands (Eritrea v. Yemen), 21 R.I.A.A. 211 (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1998); Clipperton Island (Mexico v. France), 2 R.I.A.A. 1105 (1931); Island of Palmas (U.S.A. v. The Netherlands), 2 R.I.A.A. 829 (Perm. Ct. Arb. 1928).
[3] Also refer to G.A. Res. 95 (I), The Nuremberg Principles (Dec. 11, 1946); Kellog – Briand Pact, Aug. 27, 1928, 94 L.N.T.S. 57; G.A. Res. 3314 (XXIX), Definition of Aggression (Dec. 14, 1974).
[4] Refer to G.A. Res. 68/262, Territorial Integrity of Ukraine (March 27, 2014); S.C. Res. 678 (Nov. 29, 1990); The formed condemned the annexation of Crimea, while the latter authorized the First Gulf War.
[5] Elliot Sperling, "Don't know much about Tibetan history," April 13, 2008, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/opinion/13sperling.html
[6] Eckart Klein, "Tibet’s Status Under International Law," February 1995, Tibetan Buddhism,
https://info-buddhism.com/Tibet_Status_Under_International_Law.html
[7] Peter M.R. Stirk, The Politics of Military Occupation. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009).
[8] Central Tibetan Administration, last modified 2018,  http://tibet.net/
[9]Chen Jian, "The Tibetan Rebellion of 1959 and China's changing relations with India and the Soviet Union," Journal of Cold War Studies 8, no. 3 (2006): 54-101; Central Tibetan Administration, 2008 Uprising in Tibet: Chronology and Analysis, (2008), accessed July 17, 2018, http://tibet.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/tibetprotest2008.pdf
[10] Lhamo Thondup (Dalai Lama), "Five Point Peace Plan" (speech, Washington, DC, September 21, 1987), https://www.dalailama.com/messages/tibet/five-point-peace-plan ; Lhamo Thondup (Dalai Lama), "Strasbourg Proposal" (speech, Strasbourg, France, June 15, 1988), https://www.dalailama.com/messages/tibet/strasbourg-proposal-1988
[11] Andrew Jacobs, "Tibetan Herder Dies After Setting Himself on Fire in Government Protest," June 15, 2012, The New York Times,  https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/16/world/asia/tibetan-herder-self-immolates-in-government-protest.html
Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons: Antoine Taveneaux
  
The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​