Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Secure In Their Persons, Houses, Papers, and (Phones)?

10/21/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Sasha Bryski
 
As technology continues to advance, our expectation of privacy afforded by the Fourth Amendment regarding information on our cell phones is an unresolved issue for law enforcement, civil rights advocates and the ninety-one percent of the US population who use cell phones (1). Specifically at issue is whether the search of a cell phone, incident-to-an-arrest, falls within the recognized exception to the general rule that a warrant is required for a government search. 

What has changed is that cell phones now carry our life’s story, from billing and tax information to emails and texts from colleagues, friends, foes and significant others.   While the search incident to an arrest exception is applied when a person is outside of their home, a mobile device now carries, as described by Nicole Flatlaw of ThinkProgress, “as much information about a person as one might find from searching their home.” (2)

To date, a majority of state and federal courts have allowed police to search cell phones incident to an arrest. For example,  in Gracie v. State, Alabama Court of Appeals (2011) the  search of a suspected robber’s cell phone’s call log and text messages for evidence of an accomplice was upheld. Likewise, in U.S. v. Murphy (2009), the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the warrantless search of a cell phone to develop additional evidence when counterfeit currency and drug-related items were found with the arrestee in his car.   

However, recently circuit courts have widened the split on this issue. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in U.S. v. Wurie (2013) held the warrantless search of an arrestee’s cell phone unconstitutional.  Wurie was stopped on suspicion of selling drugs and was arrested after crack cocaine was found on his person. A search of his cell phone for evidence of his drug trafficking was conducted at the police station where the phone was first seized. Referring to the personal information held on cell phones, the judge’s ruling stated “It is the kind of information one would previously have stored in one’s home and that would have been off-limits to officers performing a search incident to arrest.” 

The first circuit denied a petition to rehear this case with the chief judge asking the Supreme Court to step in, stating, “Only the Supreme Court can finally resolve these issues, and I hope it will.”

Last week, the Solicitor General filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to grant certiorari to hear the case. The government argued that the First Circuit’s ruling conflicts with the rulings of several other appeals courts, and that a cellphone is no different than any other object a suspect might be carrying.

The Supreme Court has been circumspect on Fourth Amendment rights with regard to cell phones.  In City of Ontario v. Quon, rather than addressing whether employees have a right to privacy in messages they send on work-issued mobile devices, the Court sidestepped the issue and ruled that the employer’s acquisition of the texts was reasonable under the circumstances.  

At the same time, a related issue is brewing in the circuits on whether police need a warrant to obtain historical cellphone location information from service providers. The 5th circuit ruled that a warrant was not required for the government to obtain the data. Here, the police requested 60 days of data including the date and time of the call and the number and location of the phone.  The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) argued that individuals have an expectation of privacy on their location when tracked in a space like their home over a period of time. The court ruled that cell phone records are business records, voluntarily transmitted by cell phone owners to the service provider in order to make a call.  Therefore, the Fourth Amendment does not apply.  This ruling conflicts with a decision from the 3rd circuit in 2010 and there are other cases pending in the courts.     

In the myriad of rulings on cell phones and the right to privacy afforded by the Fourth Amendment, other questions have been raised:  Are citizens subjecting themselves to this intrusion by the simple purchase of a phone? Should the Court put off a decision until technology advancements stabilize? With 8 million cell phone calls made per day, callers and texters are awaiting a decision on what constitutes an unwarranted search of their private calls, texts and photos. (3)

1. "Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project." Pew Internet: Mobile. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Oct. 2013.
2. Flatlaw, Nicole. "Whether Police Can Search Your Cell Phone Depends Who You Ask." ThinkProgress RSS. ThinkProgress, 30 July 2013. Web. 16 Oct. 2013
3. "How Many Cell Phone Calls Are Made a Day? - Dead Zones." Dead Zones. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Oct. 2013.


0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​