Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Sixth Amendment Fairness Proves Ineffective in an Unfair Justice System

3/27/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Shannon Alvino
Shannon Alvino is a junior at The George Washington University majoring in Political Science and Criminal Justice



           The United States Supreme Court has entertained an eight-decades-long complicated relationship with the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel. Here is an overview:
· Powell v. Alabama (1932) required that trial courts appoint legal representation in capital cases “where the defendant is unable to employ counsel, and is incapable of making his own defense because of ignorance, feeble mindedness, illiteracy, or the like.”
· Johnson v. Zerbst (1938) lengthened the guarantee to any defendant facing federal criminal charges.
· Betts v. Brady (1942) declined to extend the right to indigent defendants in all criminal cases; counsel was appointed only when failure to do so would be “offensive to the common and fundamental ideas of fairness.”
· Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) firmly established indigent defendants’ Sixth Amendment privileges, labeling counsel “fundamental and essential to fair trials.” Due process demanded that states conform to this federal interpretation, overruling Betts and entrenching notions of fairness.
· United States v. Wade (1967) reasoned that “today’s law enforcement machinery involves critical confrontations” that trigger the Sixth Amendment, including post-indictment lineups.
· Kirby v. Illinois (1972) specified a “critical stage” as any instance after the initiation of formal adversarial proceedings. Custodial interrogations, post-indictment corporeal lineups, preliminary hearings, arraignments, trials, sentencing hearings, and first appeals constitute “critical stages.”
· Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972) announced “absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person may be imprisoned for any offense, whether classified as petty, misdemeanor, or felony, unless he was represented by counsel at trial.”
· Scott v. Illinois (1979) argued convicted individuals could be incarcerated only if they received legal assistance. If the defendant is not sentenced to “actual imprisonment,” even if the applicable law allows for it, the Sixth Amendment does not apply.
· Strickland v. Washington (1984) created a standard for the resolution of ineffective counsel claims. The first prong assesses attorney performance, requiring the defendant to “show that counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” The second prong hinges on prejudice; a defendant must demonstrate “a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
Sixth Amendment jurisprudence has substantially evolved since Powell’s bare-bones requirement; however, it has lagged behind the ever-evolving criminal justice system. In Wade, the Court came to its conclusion “[i]n recognition of these realities of modern criminal prosecution,” referencing how the Framers, the delegates who helped to draft the US Constitution, lacked an organized police force, and much less “critical confrontations.” The Founding Fathers did not face an indigent defense system in a crisis, a plague of ineffective assistance, a host of collateral consequences, or omnipresent plea bargains, yet the right to counsel has remained stagnant.  
           Gideon trumpeted principles of fairness, yet the contemporary criminal justice system is anything but. Indigent defense funding is “shamefully inadequate,” resulting in overwhelming caseloads that preclude a satisfactory defense, a lack of systematic training, interfering cost-cutting measures, and a less-than-adversarial justice system when compared to prosecutorial resources. Modern indigent defense remains a hollow enforcement of the lofty Sixth Amendment ideals espoused in 1963, earning the moniker “Gideon’s broken promise.”
           Effective counsel is the most important right a defendant has, for it is the only means through which other constitutional guarantees are exercised. As Senator Patrick Leahy lamented, “Too often individuals facing the ultimate punishment are represented by lawyers who are drunk, sleeping, soon-to-be disbarred or just plain ineffective. Even the best lawyers in these systems are hampered by inadequate compensation and insufficient resources to investigate and develop a meaningful defense.” Strickland’s intentionally broad, overly deferential rule essentially prohibits defendants from successfully challenging their legal representation’s inept performance, stripping the right to effective counsel of its remedy.
           And remember those “critical stages?” There is a myriad of legal proceedings that do not demand the right to counsel including parole or probation revocation hearings, grand jury proceedings, immigration deportation hearings, discretionary appeals, and habeas corpus proceedings. What about that “actual imprisonment” distinction? Defendants receive legal assistance when they are facing time behind bars but today’s criminal justice system is saturated with sneaky, often inexplicit collateral consequences that prove just as damaging. These include limited employment eligibility, barriers to political participation, constricted access to public benefits like welfare and housing, suspended driver’s licenses, undermined custody rights, and automatic sex offender registration, to name a few. In short, at each stage of the criminal process, defendants routinely face harsh sanctions without counsel.
Indigent defendants also confront “the reality that criminal justice today is for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials.” Plea bargains resolve 97 percent of federal and 94 percent of state cases but lack transparency and the regulatory scrutiny of judicial review. Overall, these poisonous dynamics have reduced the modern criminal justice landscape to a dismal reality, one that breaches a Sixth Amendment-inspired philosophy of fairness, however, the Court has made unenthusiastic efforts to acclimatize.
           These meager jurisprudential adaptations include a recent plea-bargaining trio that establishes the right to counsel in this newly pervasive aspect of the judicial system. This is what happened:
· McMann v. Richardson (1970) ruled that determining adequate legal representation in advising a guilty plea depends on “whether that advice was within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases.”
· Padilla v. Kentucky (2010) labeled plea bargains a critical phase of a criminal prosecution necessitating legal assistance. It is “the critical obligation of counsel to advise the client of ‘the advantages and disadvantages of a plea agreement,’” including the risk of deportation.
· Missouri v. Frye (2012) compelled counsel to notify clients of any plea offers. A failure to communicate a prosecutor’s offer constitutes ineffective legal representation, accommodating Strickland’s effectiveness standards to the plea-bargaining context.
· Lafler v. Cooper (2012) offered a remedy to defendants prejudiced by ineffective counsel resulting in the rejection of a plea and a trial conviction. The prosecutor is required to reoffer the plea and the trial judge is to exercise discretion in deciding whether to accept the plea or affirm the conviction.
Justice Scalia derisively dissented in each recent case, arguing that the Court judicially fashioned a “new field of constitutionalized criminal procedure: plea-bargaining law.” This conclusion portends a fate similar to Gideon, an absence of direction and enforcement will render the decisions toothless.
So, what can be done? Money will be the most significant catalyst for change, whether that is the states or Congress allocating ample funds to public defense, resulting in improved training, manageable caseloads, and prosecutorial parity. State governments and bar associations can establish oversight organizations to ensure the delivery of independent, uniform, quality indigent defense. A collection of Supreme Court decisions addressing the often-harsh realities of the contemporary criminal justice climate would be nice, too.




Works Cited
American Bar Association Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants. “Gideon’s Broken Promise: America's Continuing Quest for Equal Justice.” (2004): 1-62. Print.

Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972).

Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942).

Cong. Rec. 5 Nove. 2004: S11609-S11614. (statement of Sen. Leahy).

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).

Goode, Erica. “Stronger Hand for Judges in the ‘Bazaar’ of Plea Deals.” The New York Times. 22 Mar. 2012. Web. 13 Mar. 2017.

Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938).

Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972).

Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. __ (2012).

McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 (1970).

Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. __ (2012).

Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. __ (2010).

Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932).

Scott v. Illinois, 404 U.S. 367 (1979).

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S 668 (1984).

United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967).

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​