Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Seeking Asylum: Border Crossing and the Role of Immigration Courts

5/15/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Emma Davies
Emma Davies  is a freshman in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania

In recent months, political discourse has turned its gaze towards the US-Mexico southern border in response to developing plans to build a wall, to the separation of migrant children from their families, to murmurs that caravans of migrants are trying to enter the country and to the supposed influx of illegal immigrants. The judicial system plays an dynamic role in responding to these various concerns, both realized and hypothetical. Particularly, the judicial system of immigration courts acts as a flawed and bogged-down means of addressing the legal rights and limitations of the many actors involved in border crossing [1]. ​
Primarily, families fleeing gang violence and persecution in Guatemala, Honduras, and EL Salvador represent a large portion of the population attempting to enter the US through the southern border. People have the right to enter legally without persecution or family separation, under a form of protection called asylum status. Additional immigrant statuses, Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and Deferred Enforced Entry (DED) act as alternative forms for migrants within the country to legally remain in the United States on a temporary basis [2]. 

Asylum status is available to those at ports of entry or already in the county who have been persecuted or fear persecution due to race, religion, nationality, and/or subscription to a particular social or political group [3]. To claim asylum, individuals must file an application called the I-589 within a year, go through fingerprinting and background checks, go through an interview, and then wait for the decision of an asylum officer [4]. Individuals who are apprehended on the border or in the US, without proper identification, must go through the defensive asylum process. Through this process, one must demonstrate credible fear and attend a courtroom-like appearance in front of an immigration judge, who decides if they are eligible for asylee status [5]. 

Currently, immigration surveillance at borders and in certain cities has been described by the American Civil Liberties Union as “militarized” [6]. Abuses ranging from racial profiling and excessive force occur at the hands of border patrol officers. For those who make it across the border, new executive policies have drastically reduced the number of individuals allowed to apply for asylum. Immigration courts are backed-up with 800,000 pending cases and applicants typically must wait an average of 700 days to have their case heard [7]. Underfunding of courts, lack of judges, increases in migrants, have all contributed to this backlog [8]. In the interim, pools of people wait in enforcement facilities, which have been noted for their unsafe and prison-like conditions. Under the current administration, in order to get around the Flores case--a 1997 case that prevents holding children or families in secure detention institutes for more than 20 days---resulted in the separation of children from their families. Eventually, a federal judge in California blocked its implementation. For some, however, they have to wait across the border in Mexico until the arrival of their court date. Ultimately, for those who eventually receive asylum, the lengthy waiting periods delay people’s ability to assimilate, get a job, and mentally adjust to a new life. For those who eventually are not granted asylum, it simply delays an inevitable and disappointing re-location.

Before asylum seekers can make it to trial, they must go through a “credible fear” screening, historically 75% who go through this interview process are determined to meet this requirement.  However, a sentiment of exclusivity has permeated into the legal process of applying for asylum status prompted by the decisions of the executive branch. Under the new administration, administrative officials have vowed to reduce this statistic [9]. Welfare is not considered carefully over desires to reduce government expenditures and the number of asylees. Many times these practices push against notions in the Constitution that establish the protection of individuals regardless of citizenship status.

Apathy and statis in the pre-trial phases is followed by questionable policies in an overworked and discontented court system. Due to backlog and under-funding, judges themselves express high-rates of burnout and dissatisfaction . Some judges have been reported to have had more than 3,000 cases on their docket. This pressure undermines the integrity of their court decisions. Some judges have been reported to make decisions in an average of seven minutes. This haste can often lead to mis-informed split decisions and puts particularly vulnerable cases, at threat of harm [10].

At the center of this remains another key issue. Due to the fact that deportation is considered a civil rather than criminal case, immigrants on the defensive, facing removal, do not have a right to counsel. Studies show that those with access to counsel fare better. Detained immigrants who received counsel were 2x more likely to apply for relief from detention and 5x to be granted that relief [11]. For those without counsel, the load falls on them to show a burden of proof that they have faced past persecution or have a “well-founded fear” of persecution by recounting their trauma. Often, they face complications that work against their case, such as lack of information or understanding of the process and lack of language access.

On June 11, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Session narrowed the scope of “well-founded fear”, announcing that gang violence and domestic violence would not be valid grounds to qualify for asylum status. This overruled a past policy that had been utilized by abused and vulnerable women and children. Under this past policy, “ married women in Guatemala who are unable to leave their relationship” were recognized as a “specific group” facing well-founded fear [12]. Eventually, U.S. judge Emmet Sullivan challenged Session’s new proposal in a DC lawsuit, arguing that it violated both administrative and immigration law [13]. 

Ultimately, only 20% of those who seek asylum receive asylee status, and under the current administration this number may lower [14]. Immigration courts operate in a murky middle ground between providing justice and furthering political motives. Within the broader context of executive-level immigration policies, asylum-seekers face a complicated and changing immigration process. Inefficiency and counterproductive policy decisions place an undue burden on migrants, and threatens the notion of America as a welcoming country to immigrants.

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
​
References
[1] Luxen, Micah, Jessica Lussenhop, and Raijini Vaidyanathan. "National Emergency: Is There a Crisis on the US-Mexico Border?" BBC News. February 15, 2019. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44319094.
[2] "How the United States Immigration System Works." American Immigration Council. March 26, 2019. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/how-united-states-immigration-system-works
[3] United States Code, 2006 Edition, Supplement 5, Title 8 - ALIENS AND NATIONALITY, § Chapter 12-Immigration and Nationality-Subchapter 1-General Provisions.
[4] "The Affirmative Asylum Process." US Citizenship and Immigration Services. September 02, 2009. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/affirmative-asylum-process.
[5] "Obtaining Asylum in the United States." U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services. September 03, 2009. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states.
[6] "ICE and Border Patrol Abuses." American Civil Liberties Union. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.aclu.org/issues/immigrants-rights/ice-and-border-patrol-abuses.
[7] Shear, Michael D., Miriam Jordan, and Manny Fernandez. "The U.S. Immigration System May Have Reached a Breaking Point." The New York Times, April 10, 2019. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/us/immigration-border-mexico.html.
[8] "Empty Benches: Underfunding of Immigration Courts Undermines Justice." American Immigration Council. June 17, 2016. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/empty-benches-underfunding-immigration-courts-undermines-justice.
[9] Shear, Michael D., Miriam Jordan, and Manny Fernandez. "The U.S. Immigration System May Have Reached a Breaking Point." The New York Times, April 10, 2019. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/us/immigration-border-mexico.html.
[10] "Empty Benches: Underfunding of Immigration Courts Undermines Justice." American Immigration Council. June 17, 2016. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/empty-benches-underfunding-immigration-courts-undermines-justice.
[11] Eagly, Ingrid, Esq., and Steven Shafer, Esq. "Access to Counsel in Immigration Court." American Immigration Council. December 13, 2016. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/access-counsel-immigration-court.
[12] Arya, Reena. "Attorney General Issues Precedent Decision, Matter of A-B." Catholic Legal Immigration Network. Inc. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://cliniclegal.org/resources/attorney-general-issues-precedent-decision-matter-b-seeking-limit-protection-asylum.
[13] Hals, Tom. "Court Rules in Favor of Asylum Seekers, against Trump Policy." Reuters. December 20, 2018. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-asylum/court-rules-in-favor-of-asylum-seekers-against-trump-policy-idUSKCN1OI2BI.
[14] Shear, Michael D., Miriam Jordan, and Manny Fernandez. "The U.S. Immigration System May Have Reached a Breaking Point." The New York Times, April 10, 2019. Accessed April 21, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/us/immigration-border-mexico.html.
Photo Credit: Loren Elliott/Reuters

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​