Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
  • Submissions
  • The Roundtable
  • Full Issues
  • Sponsors
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
  • Submissions
  • The Roundtable
  • Full Issues
  • Sponsors
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

School Choice: The Case for Equal Education

10/9/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Frank Geng

Frank Geng is a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania and an associate editor of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal.

Last year in Blytheville, Arkansas, a group of parents attempted to transfer their children to a public school in a nearby, wealthier district in hopes of giving them a better educational environment. School officials rejected the transfer applications, citing a historical desegregation order in their district from more than 40 years ago. The lower courts quickly dismissed the parents’ litigation, and on August 31, the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirmed the decision. [1]

In the opinion, Judge Lavenski R. Smith stated, “We agree with the district court that [no] relevant precedent support[s] the proposition that ‘a parent’s ability to choose where his or her child is educated within the public school system is a fundamental right or liberty.’” [2] Arkansas state law, however, allows parents to choose where to send their kids to school—except in the case of districts under federal desegregation orders. Parents in these districts have the right to choose to send their children to private schools; however, on the matter of public education, they must conform to a federal mandate from 1971 that requires racial enrollment balance and prohibits transfers. The Court of Appeals did not rule on whether or not the mandate should still have effect, but rather focused on the rationale of equal protection.
Beyond the obvious anachronistic gaps in the state legislation, this case speaks to a larger debate at hand: school choice. In most US states, parents have no choice over which public school their children attend. But in some, the government allows some type of flexibility in the form of scholarship tax credits, school vouchers, educational savings accounts (ESAs), charter schools, and other programs. [3] Many believe that the underlying rationale of the policy of school choice comes from the 14th Amendment and its Equal Protection Clause. In 1968, however, Justice Brennan of the Supreme Court rejected a school choice plan from a Virginia district in Green v. School Board of New Kent County. [4] Brennan’s judgment has been a keystone in a judicial history that has consistently rejected these types of plans as inadequately addressing the issue of school segregation.

The school choice model, however, is based primarily in a logic of competition. In the example of a voucher or ESA model, parents would be able to send their kids to a school that is more fitting, be it public or private. Instead of paying taxes into the general state public education system, they would receive vouchers or an account withdrawal to use at an institution of their choice. Thus, if a school district noticed that one of its schools had a significant number of ingoing or outgoing transfers, it could act accordingly in its funding or operation. In simple terms, the competition for the school vouchers and funds would incentivize a focus on a school’s curriculum and teaching and would help flush out the least effective schools. In regards to segregation, a family that lives in a low-income district that notices a lower quality education at their local school could then choose to send their child to a better nearby public school. Famed economist Milton Friedman, founder of the eponymous Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, was perhaps the foremost advocate of school choice, deriving his logic from his own free market principles. “Merit pay,” as Friedman calls it, is an essential part of a competitive market economy and, for him, is the only logical solution to the public education crisis. [5]

Opponents of this model claim that these practices may inevitably end up just depleting the public school system’s already strained resources. They are also concerned about the entanglement of government spending with religious institutions, as these vouchers are sometimes spent on parochial or other private religious schools. With regards to charter schools, critics point to examples of charter schools that have profit-seeking arms, which have become targets for private equity and hedge fund investments. [6] In an under-regulated environment, it is plausible to think that profiteering might be a potential result to a totally voucher-based system.

But if we think about it, school choice already exists on a national basis in the form of public universities. Every student that attends an in-state institution, whether or not in their local area, receives subsidized tuition—similarly with federal student loans and the G.I. Bill.

School choice exists outside the U.S. as well. France, for example, subsidizes both private and public schools, giving parents the option to choose between any of them. Sweden, too, allows students to both attend schools outside their municipalities and also use public funds towards private schools. [7] The voucher system has also found prominence in Chile’s education system. [8] The efficacy of the programs in these countries and the potential impact in the US, however, are still up for debate.

In the end, the issue comes back to the Equal Protection Clause. One could make a more legally pragmatic argument and claim that confining students to certain public schools based solely on geography (where residency is itself based on other socioeconomic factors) denies citizens of their jurisdiction “equal protection under the laws.” At least in the case of Blytheville, the issue of maintaining federal desegregation orders from the seventies should be examined by the Arkansas courts, especially in a case where those orders limit only individuals in select districts in a state that otherwise supports school choice.


[1] Gershman, Jacob. “No Guarantee of Public School Choice in Constitution, Appeals Court Rules.” New York Times. August 31, 2015. Accessed September 22, 2015. http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/08/31/no-guarantee-of-public-school-choice-in-constitution-appeals-court-rules/
[2] Adkisson v. Blytheville Sch. Dist. #5. 2015, 14 3746 1. Eight U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

[3] “School Choice in America”. Friedman Foundation For Educational Choice. Accessed September 22, 2015.
[4] Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. 1968, 391 430 1. U.S. Supreme Court.
[5] Friedman, Milton. “Busting the School Monopoly”. Newsweek. December 5, 1983. Accessed September 22, 2015. http://0055d26.netsolhost.com/friedman/pdfs/newsweek/NW.12.05.1983.pdf
[6] Wiggin, Addison. “Charter School Gravy Train Runs Express to Fat City”. Forbes. September 10, 2013. Accessed September 22, 2015. http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2013/09/10/charter-school-gravy-train-runs-express-to-fat-city/
[7] “Free to choose, and learn” The Economist. May 3, 2007. Accessed September 22, 2015. http://www.economist.com/node/9119786
[8] McEwan, Patrick J., Martin Carnoy. “The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Private Schools in Chile’s Voucher System”. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. September 21, 2000. Accessed September 22, 2015.
​
Photo Credit: Flickr User ThoseGuys119


The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.


0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Alana Mattei
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sam Nadler
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​