Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Qualified Immunity for Police Officers: An Obstacle to Justice

10/21/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Vikram Balasubramanian
Vikram Balasubramanian is a freshman in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania studying International Relations.
The United States has been struck with an epidemic of police violence, in which citizens deserving of equal protection under the law are unjustly brutalized by police. Yet, whenever someone tries to hold cops accountable, they are unable to. It is nearly impossible to sue a police officer for damages in the United States. In 2009, in Pearson v. Callahan, the Supreme Court ruled that government officials are protected from lawsuits (as an individual) unless the plaintiff can show that the official violated a “clearly established” constitutional or statutory right. [1] This is commonly known as the qualified immunity doctrine. Technically, the government can still be sued for damages caused by the official’s actions. However reasonable this might sound, the way it has been applied in court has resulted in a system in which officers are nearly always unaccountable
​Pearson was formulated with a clear rationale in mind: Officers should not be held responsible for violating rights they didn’t know existed. [2] However, the evolution of qualified immunity has allowed lower courts to skip the murky constitutional questions of whether a right was clearly established, leading to cycles of unaccountable, unconstitutional behavior. Colin Rolfs, a UCLA Law graduate and former editor of the UCLA Law Review explains:

“Rights only become clearly established as a result of a court holding that, on a particular set of facts, there was a constitutional violation. If a court makes no constitutional determination after denying a plaintiff a remedy because the law was not clearly established by a previous decision with analogous facts, a remedy will be denied in a later case with a similar violation, because the right is still not clearly established. In this way, constitutional violations can indefinitely go without being remedied, and officials can continuously engage in unconstitutional conduct.” [3]

Simply put, if a court refuses to make an explicit determination of whether (in this case) an officer’s conduct violated the Constitution (even if the court holds that the officer’s conduct was illegal), a right is not formed, and later cases that deal with the same issue also go unremedied. Thus, unconstitutional conduct can continue forever.

Though the doctrine poses numerous constitutional questions, this article will focus on the impact of qualified immunity on trust with communities that are being policed. The stories of violence against mainly minority bodies raise the question of the legitimacy of the police as an equal arbiter of the laws of the land. The qualified immunity doctrine essentially, by shielding officers from accountability, pits the force that is supposed to protect the populous as an antagonist that was sent in to infiltrate communities and creates an “us versus them” mentality. [4]

First, it is important to know that the issue of police brutality is an issue of anti-blackness. Black Americans are 2.5 times more likely than white Americans to be killed by the police. [5] In fact, the origins of a state-run police force are drawn from slave catcher patrols. A study in the Journal of Criminal Justice Education found that “the literature clearly establishes that a legally sanctioned law enforcement system existed in America before the Civil War for the express purpose of controlling the slave population and protecting the interests of slave owners. The similarities between the slave patrols and modern American policing are too salient to dismiss or ignore.” [6] The slave patrols had no accountability; today, the police don’t either. Unaccountability is the lynchpin of community mistrust.

Today, the issue of police mistrust stems from a lack of positive community engagement and accountability. In high-crime communities, engagement with the police is limited to “high rates of incarceration and community supervision, and concentrated violence.” [7] Due to the qualified immunity doctrine, police officers seem above the law, a paradox when you consider their function is to enforce the law. Though it may be justified in court by some arcane legal detail, in communities it looks like the police are allowed to brutalize and kill community members with no repercussions. The police exist to enforce every law, even though we can undoubtedly say there are some unjust and racist laws. For example, mandatory sentencing laws repeatedly condemn people to unfairly harsh prison terms, such as low-level drug possession crimes being answered with life-long imprisonment. These laws deliberately target black Americans, and the results can be seen in the statistics: “prosecutors are twice as likely to pursue a mandatory minimum sentence for black people as for white people charged with the same offense.” [8] On the surface level, the police have been tasked with disrupting communities and carrying out racist policies. Take, for example, the War on Drugs. In response to the supposed epidemic of weed and crack, the public pressured the Nixon administration to do something. Yet, the laws passed pit low-level minority drug dealers and users against police. Unsurprisingly, these policies have racist origins in the Nixon era. Nixon’s domestic policy chief admitted as much, saying:

“[T]he Nixon White House... knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the [Vietnam] war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.'' [9]

In conclusion, this article will suggest a few reforms to encourage police accountability to curb abuse. Current trends have shown that cops are almost never prosecuted in criminal court, and thus civil court is the right avenue to start reforms. [10] Police officers should not be protected by qualified immunity. Surprisingly, previous research has argued that this would not be detrimental to the government’s function. [11] Allowing civil cases to go to court creates a culture of accountability that will spill over to the rest of the functions of the police. It will be justice and progress. The American legal system is profoundly corrupt and racist, though we hope not irredeemably so. By amending the qualified immunity doctrine, we allow those harmed by the police to have their day in court, to make their voices heard, and work towards justice. This is a starting point, one that is long overdue.

​The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
References
[1] Pearson v. Callahan. 555 U.S. 223 (2009).
[2] Stauber, Anthony. "When is a Right Not a Right?: Qualified Immunity After Pearson." Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice 39 (2018): 125-51.
[3] Rolfs, Colin. “Qualified Immunity After Pearson v. Callahan.” UCLA Law Review 59 (2011): 470-501.
[4] De Stefan, Lindsey, “”No Man Is Above the Law and No Man Is Below It:” How Qualified Immunity Reform Could Create Accountability and Curb Widespread Police Misconduct.” Law School Student Scholarship 850 (2017): 1-29.
[5] Edwards, Frank, Hedwig Lee, and Michael Esposito. “Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex.” PNAS 116 (2019): 16793-16798.
[6] Turner, K. B., David Giacopassi and Margaret Vandiver, “Ignoring the Past: Coverage of Slavery and Slave Patrols in Criminal Justice Texts.” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 17 (2006) 181-195.
[7] La Vigne, Nancy, Fontaine, Jocelyn, and Anamika Dwivedi. “How Do People in High-Crime, Low-Income Communities View the Police?,” Urban Institute (2017).
[8] Drug Policy Alliance. “The Drug War, Mass Incarceration and Race (English/Spanish),” Drug Policy, January 25, 2018, Accessed October 15, 2019http://www.drugpolicy.org/resource/drug-war-mass-incarceration-and-race-englishspanish
[9] Baum, Dan. “Legalize It All.” Harper’s Magazine, April, 2016. Accessed October 5, 2019. https://harpers.org/archive/2016/04/legalize-it-all/
[10] see supra note 4
​[11] see supra note 4

Photo Credit:
​https://flic.kr/p/bg1rze
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​