Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Prisons for Profit: An Industry of Exploitation

10/24/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Private prisons are exploiting the criminal justice system to turn immense profits—and it’s happening right under our noses.
By Lyndsey Reeve
Lyndsey Reeve is a freshman in the College with a prospective major in International Relations.​
Prisons—unlike shorter-term jails—hold inmates for lengthy sentences received for serious offenses. While many prisons are public and thus government-operated, privatized incarceration can be a profit-generating machine: the more inmates, the more money a for-profit prison can raise. By capitalizing on the boom of the internment business, private enterprises such as Political Action Committees (PACs) can influence our modern political process. Because they are used to manipulate our criminal justice system for personal gain, these private prisons threaten our democracy.
Private prisons incentivize increasing inmate numbers and allowing conditions to deteriorate so special interest groups and corporations can maximize profits. As of 2014, 1 in 100 Americans were imprisoned [1]. This number has increased in recent years. Ten years ago, there were only five private prisons in the United States. Today, over 100 exist. In fact, the U.S. has imprisoned more people than any other country—including China, which has five times the U.S. population [2]. Not only is the number of inmates rapidly increasing in our country compared to other developed nations, but the prisons themselves are in abysmal conditions.

The Supreme Court found that private prisons were sometimes causing needless deaths. One California prison was so poorly maintained that one inmate died every day of entirely preventable causes. Not only did this violate the eighth amendment right to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, but it also caused a host of mental health issues among other inmates. In a 5-4 decision, Supreme Court justices elected to cut California’s prison population [3]. Other states should take note of this discovery and investigate inmate treatment more thoroughly.

Furthermore, corporations have even begun exploiting inmates by using them for cheap labor. Companies including Microsoft, AT&T, Target, and Macy’s opt to employ inmates over non-inmates to make their products less expensive [2]. The Progressive Labor Party explains the motive behind this, saying; “The private contracting of prisoners for work fosters incentives to lock people up. Prisons depend on this income. Corporate stockholders who make money off prisoners’ work lobby for longer sentences, in order to expand their workforce. The system feeds itself” [2]. Evidently, corporate gain fuels private prisons (which receive a guaranteed amount of money per inmate), thus incentivizing an increase in inmate numbers. This is concerning, because not only does the for-profit industry offer a booming business, but covert misdeeds are better concealed due to a lack of government involvement and awareness.

After exploiting incarcerated individuals, for-profit prisons then use these funds to exert control over our modern political process. PACs— groups that supposedly do not “profit” from their dealings and aim to elect candidates— take the money they make via prisons to fund the election of candidates that propagate their ideologies. In only one year, GEO (a PAC funded by prison money) spent $518,390 on political contributions and approximately $730,000 on lobbying and used this money to help increase war on drug policies. These are some of the biggest policies responsible for increasing prisoners in the U.S., which in turn increases PAC money [4]. This use of the system for individual benefit threatens our democratic process because both candidates and political office holders facing reelection bend to the will of such interest groups for much needed campaign dollars. Such control over policies allows special interests to continue to increase their income while harming American citizens—even those not incarcerated. When prison numbers increase, so does PAC money, and thusly private interest groups’ influence over politics also increases. Some of these organizations are 527 groups, and are thereby tax exempt. Therefore, not only are these groups exploiting Americans, but they are avoiding taxation on their unfairly-earned income. For example, GEO and similar PACs receive massive tax breaks and its increase of for-profit prisons costs taxpayers $39 billion[4].

Some proponents of the growing privatization of prisons may argue that the poor conditions of for-profit prisons are well-deserved. After all, individuals forfeit some of their rights when they decide to commit a crime. While this is legally true, it is important to note that many of the imprisoned are not first-rate criminals—they are not murderers, drug lords, or gang members. Of the over 2 million inmates in the U.S., the majority are black or Hispanic [2]. Many of these are immigrants convicted of minor crimes and exploited for cheap labor.

In truth, there is a great motive for private prisons to unfairly maximize the number of inmates—the more prisoners, the more money they receive. Sadly, minority and low-income individuals are more vulnerable to the traps of for-profit prisons seeking lucrative inmates. “Federal law stipulates five years’ imprisonment without possibility of parole for possession of 5 grams of crack or 3.5 ounces of heroin, and 10 years for possession of less than 2 ounces of rock-cocaine or crack. A sentence of 5 years for cocaine powder requires possession of 500 grams – which is 100 times more than the quantity of rock cocaine for the same sentence. Most individuals who use cocaine powder are white, middle-class or rich people, while mostly Blacks and Latinos use rock cocaine”[2]. Evidently, different standards apply to different racial groups and prejudice is ingrained in the system. Furthermore, new laws ignore an individual’s circumstances and require minimum sentencing, sometimes pushing jail time well past what is reasonable. In the case of one prisoner convicted of stealing a car and several bikes, a sentence was pushed to 75 years, which is more than some murderers receive [2]. This seemingly excessive sentence is one of many that could be doled out to keep profits on the rise. In fact, crime has gone down in recent years, and yet the number of prisoners is climbing. This points to an issue with the structure of private imprisonment in our country.

Despite any opposition, the biggest obstacle that stands in the way of reducing the number of private prisons is a lack of awareness. Many forget that both our democracy and individual’s lives are at stake if we allow for-profit prisons to continue their manipulation of the criminal justice system. In order to prevent PAC control of public policy, protect the rights of inmates, and reduce monopolies that profit off human suffering, we must all take a stand to eliminate the privatization of prisons in the United States.
​
​The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
References
[1] Aviram, Hadar. “Are Private Prisons to Blame for Mass Incarceration and Its Evils? Prison Conditions, Neoliberalism, and Public Choice.” Fordham Urban Law Journal. Fordham University, December 2014. search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,custuid&custid=s8455861&db=a9h&AN=102838993&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
[2] Peláez, Vicky. “The Prison Industry in the United States: Big Business or a New Form of Slavery?” Global Research, September 13, 2019. https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-prison-industry-in-the-united-states-big-business-or-a-new-form-of-slavery/8289.
[3] Liptak, Adam. “Supreme Court Upholds Order to Reduce Calif. Prison Population.” The New York Times. The New York Times, May 23, 2011. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/24/us/24scotus.html.
[4] “Private Prisons Infographic: The Cycle of Expansion and Incarceration .” Advancement Project, Enlace (Private Prison Divestment Campaign). Accessed October 15, 2019. https://advancementproject.org/wp-content/uploads/1970/01/4bb17590994400d777_z7m6b52p6.pdf.
[5] Madel, Jacob D. “Do Political Contributions Influence Public Policy? The Case of Private Prisons.” DigitalGeorgetown Home. Georgetown University, January 1, 1970. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/557796.
​[6] Photo by Hédi Benyounes on Unsplash
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​