Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Listening to Music in the 21st Century: A Copyright Discussion

4/1/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Marco DiLeonardo


Marco DiLeonardo is a sophomore at the University of Pennsylvania studying International Relations.

​The creation of the Internet has revolutionized the music industry. Transitioning from CDs and records to an entirely digital medium, music has become so much more accessible for millions of people around the world in a short time period. However, accessibility comes with many complications in the already intricate and unpredictable realm of copyright. Traditional copyright law is historically not suited to handle this emerging technology and is currently undergoing major changes, and the business models of Apple, Pandora, Spotify, Grooveshark, and SoundCloud are seeing a series of legal consequences.



In order for Apple to gather music from different artists to sell on the iTunes, it must acquire the permission of whichever label the artist is apart of. The current arrangement is centered on the agreement that the iTunes Store essentially functions as a retail outlet that sells CDs. Apple purchases the rights to sell songs of a certain label and then transfers a portion of the returns back to the music labels. Apple also possesses a streaming feature. However, iTunes Radio functions differently than the typical iTunes song purchase. Rather than a one-time royalty per purchase, in its first year of operation, 2013, Apple paid the label thirteen cents each time a song is played, and now pays the label fourteen cents.[1] Furthermore, the advertisement revenue is distributed in an agreed upon formula. In the first year of operation, Apple paid fifteen percent of the total, and later increased it to nineteen. Royalties are not taken into account if the user already purchased the file or if the listener skips the song before the twenty second mark. [2]

Much like iTunes Radio, Pandora functions under a similar format. First, it must acquire the rights from the labels and then charges a per play fee. As opposed to Apple, Pandora does not negotiate with labels to add their songs into their content, but utilizes the federal copyright law, which dictates a compulsory licensing provision. This statute allows the company to play any song, with few restrictions, at a federal royalty rate. [3] However, Pandora has encountered issues using this policy, by not paying any royalties from songs produced before 1972. Only state law protects those. As a result, Pandora is facing a lawsuit from the labels that argue for commissions. In short, the result of Capitol Records, LLC v. Pandora Media, Inc. will cause a significant impact on Pandora’s business platform. [4]         


In contrast with Pandora, but similar to Apple, Spotify does negotiate with individual labels to acquire the rights to play their songs. Like Pandora, the music service pays royalties to labels for each stream of a song, but Spotify’s rate is radically less than its competitors: about half a cent per play. Contracts also differ among artists as well as labels.


A discussion of Grooveshark reveals the most important copyright debate. According to Grooveshark’s tactical stance, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) creates an incentive to build a business based on infringement. The company’s fundamental operations are protected by the “safe harbor provisions” of the DMCA which transfers liability of copyright infringement from the company, Grooveshark, to the consumer, the offender in this case. The company does not pay any artist royalties and has no licenses or contracts with labels. As a result, once a lawsuit arises over copyright infringement, the company pleads ignorance. Grooveshark then removes it from its site but subsequently allows the same content to be offered in the future. [5] Inevitably, Grooveshark is in constant legal battles with every major label, and UMG Recording Inc v. Escape Media Group Inc., may signify the end of Grooveshark. The strategy of claiming ignorance to the infringement is being contested by troves of evidence that directly indicate that the service and its employees were well aware of the illegal uploading of copyrighted material. In fact, CEO Samuel Tarantino discovered a specific letter to the company’s employees which details: “Please share as much music as possible from outside the office… Download as many MP3’s as possible, and add them to the folders you’re sharing on Grooveshark.” [6] In short, there is a very high probability that the destruction of Grooveshark is near due to its massive copyright infringement.


SoundCloud faces a similar situation, but not to the extent of Grooveshark. The focal point in this business model is SoundCloud’s foundation of remixing. Most users download copyrighted works, alter, mix, and cut the songs, and upload them once again for download by others on the website, citing fair use to avoid copyright infringement. Until recently, SoundCloud has had a policy in their terms and conditions which “grants a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, fully paid up license to other users.” [7] In other words, the service is allowed to operate and pay nothing due to a disclaimer. However, as UMG Recording Inc v. Escape Media Group Inc. has neared a decision, SoundCloud has begun to sign licensing contracts with labels. [8] Under further pressure from the music industry, it has introduced advertisements to certain songs. With these new agreements, the music service will adopt a policy akin to that of Spotify, but with a restricted platform including only certain artists and songs.


In conclusion, Apple and other music streaming companies struggle to provide affordable services with copyright laws grounded in an era without the Internet. With heavy pressure from record labels and their legal teams, music streaming services are obliged to cooperate with outdated federal and state statutes. When will lawmakers realize the urgent need to reform copyright law? As more and more lawsuits are filed, only time will tell.




[1] Griggs, Brandon. "How iTunes Changed Music, and the World." CNN. Cable News Network, 26 Apr. 2013. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.
[2] Karp, Hannah, and Jessica E. Lessin "Apple Spells Out iTunes Radio Terms." Digits RSS. N.p., 26 June 2013. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.
[3] Layton, Julia. "How Pandora Radio Works - HowStuffWorks." HowStuffWorks. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.
[4] Grimm, Nicole, Ann Palma, and McDonnell Boehner. "Capitol Records, LLC v. Pandora Media, Inc.: Future of Digital Music May Depend on State Copyright Protection of Pre-1972 Sound Recordings." Law.com. N.p., 29 Aug. 2014. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.
[5] "While Artists Are Complaining About Spotify Royalties... Google, YouTube and Grooveshark Are in the Getaway Car..." The Trichordist. N.p., 16 Jan. 2014. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.
[6] "Grooveshark On The Hook : Notice and Shakedown." The Trichordist. N.p., 19 Apr. 2012. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.
[7] Shepherd, Ian. "SoundCloud’s Terms and Conditions – Are They Fair and Reasonable ?" Production Advice RSS. N.p., 1 June 2009. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.
[8] Sisario, Ben. "SoundCloud Signs Licensing Deal With Warner Music." The New York Times. The New York Times, 04 Nov. 2014. Web. 02 Dec. 2014.
​
Photo Credit: Flickr User 
AdamChandler86

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​