Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

DNA Collection of Arrestees: Spitting on the Fourth Amendment

7/12/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Edgar Palomino

Edgar Palomino is a rising senior at the University of Pennsylvania studying political science.

Many states require DNA collection from those convicted of felonies, and some states also collect for various misdemeanors. [1] This collection builds a genetic database that can be used to verify a convict’s identity should future crimes occur. However, DNA is also being collected from arrestees that are still presumed innocent. Additionally, there is a trend among states to use the DNA collected from arrestees to search existing databanks for DNA matches with other crimes. While the crime resolving benefits of this method are obvious, the seizure of DNA from arrestees and subsequent matching (and conviction) can be argued to be self- incrimination and thus a violation of the Fourth Amendment.   
​     
            

In 2009, Alonzo King was arrested on assault charges and had his inner cheek swabbed for DNA. The DNA was entered into a database and matched with that of a rape kit from years earlier, and King was subsequently convicted for the rape and sentenced to life in prison. King appealed, arguing that at the time of arrest he was presumed innocent of the rape and that the DNA swab thus constituted an unreasonable search and seizure, which violated his Fourth Amendment rights. In 2013, the Maryland Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of King and overturned the previous ruling. This set a precedent for barring the state from collecting DNA when booking arrestees.
However, later that year, the Supreme Court overturned the Appeals ruling in a 5-4 vote. Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion, arguing that DNA collection was the same a fingerprinting in that it was decades old and a “reasonable” booking procedure that assisted in the identification of arrestees.  On the contrary, Justice Scalia wrote the dissenting opinion, arguing that the state did not need DNA in order to verify whom was in its custody, and that the practice of using an arrestee's DNA to search banks for other crimes did indeed violate the Fourth Amendment. Four out of nine Justices recognized the infringement of this practice. Nonetheless, the ruling upheld the warrantless collection of DNA from arrestees. [2]

The responses amongst the States were mixed. In the State v. Raynor case in 2014, the Maryland Court of Appeals expanded the state’s ability to collect DNA, ruling that the state could collect DNA without a warrant from someone who hadn’t  been arrested. [3] In contrast, some states argue that the practice of collecting DNA violates their State constitutions. For example, the California Court of Appeals ruled against DNA collection in the 2014 People v. Buza case and the Supreme Court of Vermont ruled similarly in the 2014 State v. Medina. [4] As these battles continue to progress across the states, it is useful to bear in mind that the collection of DNA from arrestees it is not only a battle over Fourth Amendment rights.                    
It is part of a larger struggle to define laws and policies regarding genetic privacy. The amount of information that can be gleaned from DNA is staggering. Current methods are able to track down individuals and close to fifty relatives from only DNA samples, the age, and the state of residence of an individual. Being in a large database offers no anonymity; geneticists have been able to locate an individual within a large database that had only .1% of their DNA in it. [5] There is naturally a gap between what a genetic lab can do and what the average forensics lab can do. However, the law can utilize the genetic lab and law enforcement is investing in specialized new technology that will increase its capabilities. It is therefore important not just in upholding the Fourth Amendment, but also for shaping the larger body of law concerning genetic privacy that the warrantless collection of DNA from arrestees ceases.

[1] National Conference of State Legislatures. Convicted Offenders Required to Submit
[2] Memmot, Mark. June 2013. “Supreme Court Upholds Warrantless Collection of DNA.” NPR.org. Accessed May 18th, 2016. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo- way/2013/06/03/188291914/supreme-court-upholds-warrantless-collection-of- dna
[3] Lynch, Jennifer. January 2015. “State Courts Strike Blows to Ciminal Collection Laws in 2014-What to Look for in 2015.” Electronic Frontier Foundation. Accessed May 18th, 2016. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/01/state-courts-strike- blows-criminal-dna-collection-laws-2014-what-look-2015
[4] Denver District Attorney. Opinion: People v. Buza. August 4, 2011. Accessed May 19th, 2016. Pg. 1 http://www.denverda.org/DNA_Documents/Arrestee_Database/Buza.pdf
Lynch, Jennifer. January 2015. “State Courts Strike Blows to Ciminal Collection Laws in 2014-What to Look for in 2015.” Electronic Frontier Foundation. Accessed May 18th, 2016. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/01/state-courts-strike-blows- criminal-dna-collection-laws-2014-what-look-2015
[5] Kolata, Gina. June 16, 2013. Poking Holes in Genetic Privacy. The New York Times. Accessed May 19th, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/18/science/poking- holes-in-the-privacy-of-dna.html?_r=0

Photo Credit: Flickr User Aaron Mott


The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​