Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Judging the Judges: The Supreme Court and Partisanship

11/10/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Derek Willie

Derek Willie is a sophomore at the University of Pennsylvania

“I promise you that we will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton, if she were president, would put up.” [1] So pledged Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) on a Philadelphia radio station, largely in an effort to convince fellow Republicans to reelect incumbent Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA). It seems, however, that McCain’s promise served only to reinforce Democrats’ allegations of hyper-partisanship in the GOP, especially following Senate Republicans’ refusal to consider President Obama’s appointment of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court. McCain’s office quickly argued that his remarks were grounded in Sec. Clinton’s “clear record of supporting liberal judicial nominees.” [2]

Liberal judicial nominees? What else would McCain expect from the nominee of the Democratic Party? The Senator’s preemptive dismissal of any “liberal judicial nominee” seems to exclude almost anyone Ms. Clinton would reasonably nominate. Furthermore, Democrats could employ McCain’s logic to justify obstructing the judicial nominees of a potential Republican president. In a political climate that essentially forces political leaders to focus on the demands of their party’s ideological base, it is easy to label a prospective judge as “too liberal” or “overly conservative.” As difficult as it is to believe in the era of Donald Trump, there will be another Republican president, perhaps immediately succeeding Hillary Clinton. If Republicans set the precedent of opposing judicial nominees on a purely ideological basis, Democrats would likely continue it, rendering the judicial confirmation process an almost completely partisan enterprise.  Given the filibuster rules of the Senate, it would take a supermajority (sixty senators) to quell the resistance of a united, persistent minority.

This creates the prospect of a judiciary tainted by partisanship, which could pose major procedural predicaments, impairing the court’s logistical ability to perform its constitutional responsibilities (as evident in the tied votes on several cases by the current eight-justice bench). Despite many recent claims by Democrats, the Constitution does not technically require the Senate to act on a judicial nominee. Indeed, every judicial appointment requires the “advice and consent of the Senate”; if the Senate chooses to withhold such consent, no new judges can be sworn in. [3] Moreover, once the judiciary’s composition becomes directly dependent on the Senate’s, it becomes impossible to detach the ideological proceedings of Congress from the putatively independent deliberations of the judiciary. In a sense, the GOP could be unwittingly destroying the very principle of judicial impartiality it purports to defend.

How then, are we to reconcile partisanship with the ideal of judicial independence? How might we exempt the judiciary from ever-pervasive presidential and congressional politics? On his campaign website, McCain succumbs to the oft-mentioned “judicial activism” argument popular among conservatives: “The proper role of the federal judiciary is to interpret the Constitution and laws created by the legislature—not to assert itself as activist or create its own laws.” [4] The Republican Party’s platform reverberates McCain’s doctrine, labeling “an activist judiciary” as a “critical threat to our country’s constitutional order.” [5] It seems, then, that McCain and fellow Republicans oppose altogether any injection of ideology into the judicial sphere—or so they claim. A few lines later, though, on his website, McCain touts his leadership on the “Gang of 14” committee, which “allowed several of President Bush's judicial nominees to proceed in a gridlocked Senate, including the confirmation of two of the Supreme Court's most conservative, constitutionalist justices - Roberts and Alito.” [6] Wait a minute— was it not McCain who lambasted Hillary Clinton for supporting liberal judicial nominees? It is hard to see how a Republican Senator can vigorously oppose “activist” judges while openly supporting those with right-wing ideological leanings. If McCain wishes to sustain his original reasoning, it almost requires us to disqualify conservatism as an ideology, or something capable of activism.

Unsurprisingly, the GOP is no more furtive in its hypocrisy. Denouncing the “Roe, Obergefell, and the Obamacare cases” as “activist decisions,” the platform proceeds to proclaim that “a new Republican president will restore to the Court a strong conservative majority that will follow the text and original meaning of the Constitution and our laws.” [7] Both McCain and his GOP allies seem to argue that a conservative interpretation of the Constitution is the correct one, no questions asked. The right-leaning Federalist Society indulges in the same tactic, opining that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be.” [8] For the Federalist Society, this constitutional “reality” involves “reordering priorities within the legal system to place a premium on individual liberty, traditional values, and the rule of law.” [9] Employing a series of abstract terms, the Federalist Society conceals that any legal decision to revert to “traditional values” inevitably manifests itself as conservative, political ideology, not as an impartial or natural way of interpreting the Constitution. Thus, in an almost arrogant attempt to enthrone their own principles as objective truth, conservatives reduce their allegation of “judicial activism” to a guise of pure, unfettered partisanship.

Acknowledging the apparent ideological stake of conservatives seeking a return to judicial “objectivity,” we might wonder whether it is truly possible to access an impartial interpretation of the Constitution, unstained by ideology or politics. Evidence from recent history suggests that it is not. Before Republicans obstructed President Obama for his liberal judicial nominees, Democrats did the same for President Bush. [10] By intertwining the judiciary with the Presidency and the Senate, the Founders created in the Supreme Court an inherently political institution, a matter exacerbated by the current hyper-partisan climate. Perhaps it is no longer appropriate to imagine the Supreme Court as a discrete entity; perhaps it is naive to think that the judiciary could ever escape the political influence surrounding it. How we should proceed under the scourge of congressional gridlock is unclear; we may be certain, however, that the Supreme Court represents only one symptom of a much greater, more profound ideological division plaguing America.

[1] Lithwick, Dahlia. "The GOP Has Spent Years Saying Nothing Matters More Than the Supreme Court. Now That’s Backfiring." Slate Magazine. 2016. Accessed October 27, 2016. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2016/10/john_mccain_s_scotus_comments_reveal_a_lot_about_the_gop.html
[2] Ibid.
[3] “Article II." LII / Legal Information Institute. Accessed October 27, 2016. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii.
[4] "Issues — Senator John McCain, Arizona." Senator John McCain Arizona. Accessed October 27, 2016. http://www.johnmccain.com/issues/.
[5] "The 2016 Republican Party Platform." GOP. 2016. Accessed October 27, 2016. https://www.gop.com/the-2016-republican-party-platform/.
[6] "Issues — Senator John McCain, Arizona." Senator John McCain Arizona. Accessed October 27, 2016. http://www.johnmccain.com/issues/.
[7] "The 2016 Republican Party Platform." GOP. 2016. Accessed October 27, 2016. https://www.gop.com/the-2016-republican-party-platform/.
[8] Ibid.
[9] "About Us." : The Federalist Society. Accessed October 27, 2016. https://www.fed-soc.org/aboutus/.
[10] Heine, Debra. "Democrats Set The Rules on Blocking Judicial Nominations." PJ Media Trending. February 15, 2016. Accessed October 27, 2016. https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/02/15/democrats-set-the-rules-on-blocking-judicial-nominations/.

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.


0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​