Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Implications of a Majority Conservative Supreme Court of the United States

10/25/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Esther Lee
Esther Lee is a sophomore, studying Philosophy, Politics, and Economics in the College of Arts and Sciences and Finance & Operations in The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

With the recent confirmation hearings of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court of the United States, there is undoubtedly a question of whether her presence on the bench could mark an enormous shift for future holdings. If confirmed, Barrett will give the court’s conservative wing a solid 6-3 majority. Currently, Chief Justice John Roberts is the court’s median [1]. Barrett is a self-proclaimed originalist, meaning she believes that constitutional text should be interpreted as “what it did at the time it was ratified and that this original public meaning is authoritative” [2]. One estimate of her ideological leanings is that Barrett will be the third-most conservative justice on the court, to the right of Trump’s previous nominees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, and just to the left of Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas. Using Alito’s career as a guide, it is expected that Barrett will reach conservative decisions in 84% of non-unanimous decisions and 71% of all cases [3]. Though these predictions are not always correct — as several of the court’s most liberal justices were appointed by Republican presidents — the conservative legal movement has been able to bring to prominence potential justices, like Barrett, who are consistent ideological conservatives [1]. 
Barrett’s addition to the court will provide a strong continuation for the following of three subtle doctrinal tools that the conservative Court have developed: willful ignorance of political reality, the presumption of legislative good faith, and animus laundering. Such results may depress minority voting and block nonpartisan election reform, as seen in racial gerrymandering cases, where the Court has held that predominant racial motivations in redistricting is impermissible, yet partisan motivations are permissible. These three doctrines could likely hurt minority voting rights, and demonstrate the power of the Court to move doctrine subtly without evoking the controversy proceeding forthright judicial declarations [5]. In addition, is predicted that Barrett will be a reliable conservative vote to uphold restrictions on abortion, apply originalist methodology on post-Heller second amendment cases, limit gay rights, and invalidate affirmative action programs and campaign finance regulations [4].

Several recent examples demonstrate the three doctrinal tools mentioned above. According to a recent paper published in the Georgetown Law Journal Online, Chief Justice Roberts has demonstrated false naivete about what social scientists and courts can know about voters’ political behavior. In the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder case, Roberts decided with the majority to sever a key part of the Voting Rights Act that “things have changed in the South. The presumption of good faith has favored legislative self-interest and against findings of minority vote dilution. As seen in the decision of Abbott v. Perez, lower courts have to assume good faith even when self-interested legislators enact laws or policies which preserve their own power. The Court has stretched the realm of good faith to include “constitutional political gerrymandering.” Furthermore, by deriving nondiscriminatory reasons to support discriminatory laws, the Court has allowed government actors to reenact laws only slightly different from the original. Amicus laundering can be seen in cases such as the Abbott v. Perez and a fifth circuit case on Texas’s voter identification law [5].

Barrett replacing Ginsburg will be one of the largest swings on the court since 1953. She is a favorite of conservative Christians, as she is perceived to be a justice who will significantly expand states’ ability to restrict abortion access, possibly even consider to overturn Roe v. Wade [1]. In contrast to the late Justice Ginsburg, who stated that “legal challenges to undue restrictions on abortion procedures . . . center on a woman’s autonomy to determine her life’s course, and thus to enjoy equal citizen statute,” Barrett has an anti-abortion record. Though Barrett has recognized that a woman’s right to abortion is unlikely to change, the Court can give states the ability to place restrictions on clinics, making abortion more difficult [6]. As an appeals court judge, Barrett joined a dissent in 2018, where the Indiana Law that would have outlawed abortions that were based on the race, sex or disability of a fetus was struck down.
She joined with Judge Frank Easterbrook, who referred to the Indiana statute as “an anti-eugenics law.”

When proceeding with the Second Amendment cases, Barrett might join with the other conservative justices for a broad view of gun rights under the 2nd Amendment [7]. A recent study assessing fifty of the most significant Second Amendment cases across the federal circuit courts showed that while there is near unanimous national consensus within the federal circuit courts on applying the methodology to such cases — a framework for deciding cases known as the “two-step test” or the “two-part test” — there are important unresolved methodological issues that have an impact on how such cases are analyzed and dec
ided. The issues allow judges to influence the ultimate decision in a case while appearing to be objective [8].

Judge Barrett is a devout Catholic and member of the religious network People of Praise, suggesting that she may be sympathetic towards Christian groups. Barrett may be consistent with her late mentor Justice Antonin Scalia’s belief that the law superseding religious objections “must be preferred to a system in which each conscience is a law unto itself.” For example, in Employment Division v. Smith in 1990, the Court ruled that laws violate the First Amendment only if they target a specific religious practice, not if they simply contradict them. A recent law suit specifically asks the court to reconsider the precedent established in Employment Division v. Smith. Some worry that if the precedent is overturned, it could leave LGBTQ individuals unprotected, allowing anyone who has a religious basis for discriminating to claim exemption from the application of civil rights laws [9].

If Barrett is confirmed, she will be the youngest justice on the Court, allowing her to reshape the law for decades to come. She comments on her late mentor, Justice Antonin Scalia, “His judicial philosophy is mine, too — a judge must apply the law as written.” 

References
[1] Thomson-Deveaux, A. (2020, September 25). How Amy Coney Barrett Could Change The Supreme Court. Retrieved October 19, 2020, from https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-amy-coney-barrett-could-change-the-supreme-court/

[2] Millhiser, I. (2020, October 12). Originalism, Amy Coney Barrett's approach to the Constitution, explained. Retrieved October 19, 2020, from https://www.vox.com/21497317/originalism-amy
-coney-barrett-constitution-supreme-court
[3] Epstein, L., Martin, A. D., & Quinn, K. (2020, September 21). Replacing Justice Ginsburg. Retrieved October 19, 2020, from
http://epstein.wustl.edu/research/ReplacingJusticeGinsburg.pdf

[4] Judge Amy Coney Barrett: Her Jurisprudence and Potential ... (2020, October 6). Retrieved October 19, 2020, from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46562

[5] Hasen, Richard L., The Supreme Court’s Pro-Partisanship Turn (March 4, 2020). Georgetown Law Journal Online,Vol.109, 2020, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2020-07, Available at SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3548858

[6] O’Leary, Erin, Raising the Stakes: When a Supreme Court Justice Dies During an Election Year (September 30, 2020). Saint Louis University School of Law Journal Online, Available at:
https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=lawjournalonline

[7] Savage, D. G. (2020, September 26). In Amy Coney Barrett, conservatives see the Supreme Court champion they've longed for. Retrieved October 18, 2020, from https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-09-26/with-amy-barrett-conservatives-get-the-supreme-court-champion-theyve-been-seeking
[8] Frassetto, Mark, Judging History: How Judicial Discretion in Applying Originalist Methodology Affects the Outcome of Post-Heller Second Amendment Cases (April 25, 2020). 21 William and Mary Bill of Rights J., Forthcoming, Available at SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3584897
[9] O'Connell, R. (2020, October 08). The Barrett factor: How would the new justice rule on religious freedom and gay rights? Retrieved October 18, 2020, from
https://www.deseret.com/indepth/2020/10/8/21502913/trump-supreme-court-scotus-pick-barrett-rbg-ginsburg-gay-rights-lqbt-scalia-discrimination

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​