Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

How Legal Informatics Would Change Legal Services

12/9/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Nayeon Kim

Nayeon Kim is a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania.

This October, Harvard Law School announced that it would digitize the vast collection of legal books in its library, which includes almost all documentations of judicial decisions made at the state and federal levels since the colonial era. [1] The school plans to scan the collection, which amounts to some 40 million pages, and distribute it on the Internet for free. Many legal experts tout this decision as a landmark in improving access to the legal system because it would make primary legal documents readily available for all, helping public defenders who may not be able to afford commercial information retrieval services to find the information they need.

Although Harvard Law’s decision to open up its legal resources is certainly not a small one, the school’s action is a part of a movement to democratize the practice of law with the help of digital and information technology. Ever since the Internet changed how legal discovery is done, from flipping through the pages of thick case books to finding information online, information technology has been a force seeking to standardize and systemize legal service which has been tailored to the needs of individual clients. [2] For example, legal documents have been prepared by lower-level associates without using any pre-existing, standard format. However, recently a number of legal startups are offering document preparation services involving standardized forms and self-service document creation. For instance, Fairdoc aims to decrease the cost of preparing legal documents by letting clients fill data into pre-existing forms and make some custom adjustments without substantive involvement of legal professionals. Not only standardizing rather routine tasks such as legal discovery and document preparation, information technology is also aiming to influence the analytical core of a lawyer’s work. Ravel, a legal startup focusing on visualizing the relationship between legal cases, which partnered with Harvard to digitize the library, is likely to drive down legal costs by making drawing connections between legal cases easier and more efficient. More experimental projects such as the Hammurabi, the goal of which is to codify certain parts of U.S. law into machine-readable form, also has the potential to make the legal system more accessible by enabling non-professionals to determine on their own what they are required to do according to the law.
Other than decreasing the cost of legal services and making it more accessible, how would the field of legal informatics, defined as the application of information organization, storage, retrieval, and dissemination techniques within the context of the legal environment, change the practice of law? A good framework to analyze the effects of legal informatics appears in a seemingly unrelated book called The World Is Flat by Thomas L. Friedman that discusses the impact of globalization and information technology on the global economy. In the book, Friedman explains that he titled the book The World Is Flat because he believes that the world is becoming flat in a sense, meaning that the barriers to doing something are disappearing and everyone would be  on a level playing field. He supports this claim with a myriad of examples, the most notable of which is that media has become rather democratized with the development of blogging and independent journalism. He states that as the playing field becomes more level, the cost of using the most basic services or technologies would be driven down but value-added services would generate profit. Returning to the media example, Friedman notes that the cost of viewing blog posts is zero but the cost of viewing posts that are proven to be insightful—such as posts in major newspapers and magazines—is high enough to keep media companies running.

The legal services market seems to be following a similar pattern. Although the decline of cost in basic legal services has not entirely materialized yet, the practice of receiving a lot of money—from thousands to millions of dollars—for basic services would not be sustainable in the long run. Legal practice is one of the areas which lags behind other sectors in terms of the degree of integration with information technology [3], and the cost-saving benefits of adopting information technology will pressure law firms to utilize legal informatics when performing certain tasks. For example, Willing, a company that specializes in creating wills, now provides its main services for free but plans to generate profit by providing other services as well. [4] Ravel plans to make Harvard’s primary legal documents searchable on its website but hopes to make money by providing better tools to analyze a given case’s outcome, such as showing how a certain judge has a propensity to make certain decisions. And existing commercial legal information retrieval services such as Westlaw and LexisNexis that charge legal professionals for viewing primary documents say that their business would not be seriously impacted by making these documents free because they provide new ways to find and analyze relevant information in the documents. [5]

So no matter how much legal informatics makes legal services accessible, there still would be services not readily available to everyone and people would have to pay for such services. However, considering that even primary legal documents, which are formally in the public domain, have not been freely available to the public, developments in information technology that makes legal services more efficient and affordable will clearly improve the lives of thousands of Americans who cannot receive fair treatment just because they cannot pay for a lawyer.


[1] Eckholm, Erik. “Harvard Law Library Readies Trove of Decisions fpr Digital Age.” The New York Times, October 28, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/29/us/harvard-law-library-sacrifices-a-trove-for-the-sake-of-a-free-database.html?_r=0
[2] Susskind, Richard. “From Bespoke to Commodity.” Legal Technology Journal, Issue 1, 2005. http://www.legaltechnologyjournal.co.uk/content/view/21/51/
[3] “Dan Katz on Legal Informatics, Corporate Law Firm Ownership and 21st Century Legal Education.” Truth on the Market, September 20, 2011. http://truthonthemarket.com/2011/09/20/dan-katz-on-legal-informatics-corporate-law-firm-ownership-and-21st-century-legal-education/
[4] Abramowitz, Zach. “Five Legal Startups You Should Get to Know.” Above the Law, September 29, 2015. http://abovethelaw.com/2015/09/five-legal-startups-you-should-get-to-know/
[5] Eckholm, Erik. “Harvard Law Library Readies Trove of Decisions fpr Digital Age.” The New York Times, October 28, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/29/us/harvard-law-library-sacrifices-a-trove-for-the-sake-of-a-free-database.html?_r=0

Photo Credit: Flickr User 
NKCPhoto

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sam Nadler
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​