Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Examining Racial Bias in Traffic Stops Using Bayesian Networks

1/10/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Sneha Parthasarathy
Sneha is a junior in the School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania majoring in Politics, Philosophy, & Economics and minoring in Healthcare Management, Biological Basis of Behavior,  and Engineering Entrepreneurship.

  1. Introduction
In June 2020, individuals across America protested systemic racism after George Floyd’s death at the hands of the police. While the media and public often focuses on racism in fatal police shootings, discrimination in everyday police-civilian interactions is less extensively studied. This investigation aims to explore potential racial bias in one such police-civilian encounter: traffic stops. 

​
To do so, this investigation will use Bayesian Networks and strive to answer the two following questions:
                      Question 1a: Is the probability of being stopped, searched, and subject to police force greater for Black                                                            drivers than for white drivers?
                     Question 1b: Is the share of Black drivers among the drivers who are stopped, searched, and subject to police force larger                           than their share in the total driving population?
Bayesian Networks are graphical models of joint probability distribution, or the probabilities of multiple events occurring together. Bayesian Networks model the cause-effect chain between multiple events that occur one after the other. These Networks use conditional probabilities—the probability of one event given another—to determine how the probability of one event being true changes the likelihood of sequential events in the Network. 

Bayesian Networks use a formula called the chain rule of probability ("Bayesian"), which can be written as follows:
                      P(a,b,c,...z) =P(a | b, c,...z) P(b | c,...z) P(c | ...z) ... P(z)
Here, a, b, c… z are specific outcomes to random variables A, B… Z, or variables whose values depend on an unknown, random event. In this formula, a is the outcome of event A being true and a’ is the outcome that event A is false. P(a, b, c, … z) represents the probability of outcomes a, b,...z occurring together, or their joint probability. The comma acts as an “and,” representing when different outcomes occur together. The notation P(b | c) means the probability of event b happening given event c has already happened. Here, the events that precede event a are called its parent nodes because they are “causes” of a. The chain rule of probability essentially relates each event to its parent nodes, stating that the total probability of all the events occurring together is the product of the probabilities of each event being true given the events that precede it. When  x1, x2, … xn are specific outcomes to random events, the chain rule of probability can be expressed as”
                                                                             P(x1, x2, … xn) = P(xi | parents Xi) 
Picture
Question 1a: Is the probability of police stopping, searching, and using force on Black drivers greater than for white drivers?
Answering this question requires the use of the Bayesian Network in Figure 1, which links three events: a driver being stopped, searched, and subject to force (a stop-search-force encounter). If the probability of these 3 events occurring together for Black and white drivers differs, there is clear evidence of racial bias. I found data on traffic stops in the 2015 “Contacts Between Police and the Public'' report. This report, published every few years by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, contains details about various police-civilian encounters based on responses from U.S. residents. Using “Contacts Between the Police and the Public,” I gathered demographic data on traffic stops, searches, and police use of force and their racial composition, which Table 1 shows.  

Table 1. Traffic Stops, Searches, and Use of Force from “Contacts Between Police and the Public” ​

Picture
In the following section, I present my calculations. First, I calculate the probability that the police stop, search, and use force on a random driver of any race. Next, I find the same probability for Black and white drivers individually. If the probabilities differ drastically, it suggests there is some element of racial bias.

  1. Calculating the Probability of Police Stopping, Searching, and Exerting Force on a Random Driver of any Race
To represent traffic stops, searches, and force mathematically, I defined my variables as follows: S = stopped, H = searched, and F = subject to force. When these events are true, they are denoted with the lowercase s, h, and f respectively . To find the joint probability of being stopped, searched, and subject to force, or P(s, h, f), I applied the the chain rule of probability P(x1, x2, … xn) = P(xi | parents Xi) to the events in Figure 2 to find:
                                                        P(s, h, f) = P(f | h) P(h | s) P(s)
According to the BJS report (Column 5), 
                                                        P(s) = 19,204,500223,315,400= 0.08599… 
P(h | s) is given in the data as 0.037, and P(f | h) is given in the data as 0.033.
Inputting these numbers into the equation P(s, h, f) = P(f | h) P(h | s) P(s), I found:
                                                        P(s, h, f) = (0.033) (0.037) (0.08599…)
                                                                                    = 1.050025... 10-4
                                                                                    = 1.05 10-4 (3 sf )
About 1 in 10,000 of all drivers will face a scenario when police stop, search, and use force on them in a year. 
  1. Calculating the Probability of Police Stopping, Searching, and Exerting Force on a Black Driver
To investigate racial bias, I wanted to see if the value of P(s, h, f) changes depending on the race of the driver. I expressed the probability that a driver is stopped, searched, and subject to force given they are Black as P(s, h, f | b), where b denotes a Black driver. I restricted the population to Black drivers and found s, h, and f for only Black drivers, so b is considered given.
​

I calculated the probability of P(s, h, f | b) as follows. Using Table 1, I found:
                                                     P(s | b) = 2,416,700 24,772,700= 0.0975549... 
                                                                P(h | s, b) = 0.044 (given)
                                                                P(f | h, s, b) = 0.052 (given)
Inputting these values to calculate P(s, h, f | b) using the chain rule of probability,     
                                                     P(s, h, f | b) = 0.052 0.044 0.0976...
                                                                          = 2.2320577...10-4
                                                                          = 2.2310-4 (3 sf)
The police stop, search, and use force on about 2 in 10,000 of all Black drivers in a given year. Comparing these results to the general population, it is evidence that police are about twice as likely to use force on Black drivers following a stop and search than the general population. 
  1. Calculating the Probability of Police Stopping, Searching, and Exerting Force on a White Driver 
I applied the same method to find the probability that police stop, search, and use force on a white driver P(s, h, f | w) where w means the driver is white. Again, because I used s, h, f for only white drivers (Table 1), w is considered a given.
                                                      P(s, h, f | w) = P(f | h, w) P(h | s, w) P(s | w)
                                                                                   = 0.024 0.033 0.08606…
                                                                                   = 6.8160920… 10-5
                                                                                   = 6.82 10-5 (3 sf)
So police stop, search, and use force on 7 in 100,000 white drivers.
​

To compare Black and white drivers, I found the ratio of P(s, h, f | b) to P(s, h, f | w):
                                                   P(s, h, f | b)P(s, h, f | w)= 2.23… 10-46.816… 10-5 = 3.27 (3 sf)
This ratio means that police are 3.27 times more likely to stop, search, and use force on Black drivers than white drivers. These findings reveal a relatively large disparity between the two races that may not have emerged without the use of Bayesian Networks.
On its own, the BJS report provides data on standalone percentages of white and Black individuals who are stopped, searched after stops, and subject to force as shown in Table 2. When looking at that data, the discrepancies between these two races at each stage of a traffic stop do not appear significant. However, by building a chain of events in a Bayesian Network and applying the chain rule of probability, the individual probabilities of sequential stages can be combined to determine the joint probability of the final outcome: being stopped, searched, and subject to force. When observing this joining probability, a clear statistical discrepancy emerges: Black drivers are more than 3 times as likely as white drivers to be stopped, searched, and subject to force a traffic stop. Thus, The Bayesian Network approach is stronger than examining standalone percentages separately as it can relate linked events to reveal significant racial bias in a complete police-civilian encounter. 



Question 1b: Is the share of Black individuals among the drivers who police stop, search, and subject to force larger than their share in the driving population?
Another useful indicator of racial bias is whether the share of Black drivers in all stop-search-force scenarios is comparable to their share in the total driving population. In other words, is the probability that someone who was stopped, searched, and subject to force is Black, or P(b | s, h, f), greater than P(b), the likelihood that any driver in the population is Black? If the probabilities differ, it shows that police stop, search, and use force on Black drivers at a disproportionate rate to their share in the driving population.
While I did not explicitly calculate P(b | s, h, f), I can find it using other probabilities found when answering Question 1b. To do so, I will use Bayes Theorem, which calculates the probability that a hypothesis is true given certain evidence using the probability of observing that evidence if the hypothesis is true. Mathematically expressed, the formula for Bayes Theorem, where h = the hypothesis and e = the evidence, is:
                                                                                     P(h | e) = P(e | h) P(h)P(e)
With this theorem, P(b | s, h, f) can be defined as:
                                                                                      P(b | s, h, f) = P(s, h, f | b) P(b)P(s, h, f)
P(b) is the probability that a random driver is Black. It can be found by dividing the number of Black drivers by the total driving population (from Table 1) as follows: 
                                                                                      P(b) = 24,772,700223,315,400= 0.111… = 11.1%
Using my previous calculations of P(s, h, f | b) and P(s, h, f) as well as P(b), 
                                                     P(b | s, h, f) = (2.232057709... 10-4) (24,772,700223,315,400) 1.05002586... 10-4
                                                                          = 0.23580884…
                                                                          = 0.236 (3 sf) or 23.6%
Black drivers make up only about 11.1% of the driving population. However, they account for 23.6% of all cases of people who are stopped, searched, and subject to force. This suggests that police subject Black drivers to force after a stop and search at a rate far higher than their share in the population. This disproportionate comparison reveals that there is racial bias at  play during traffic stops, otherwise the two results would be closer to equal.



Results:
​

Question 1a determined that Black drivers are more than 3 times more likely to be stopped, searched, and subject to force than white drivers. Question 1b found that the share of Black drivers in stop-search-force scenarios is twice their share in the driving population. These findings show a large statistical discrepancy between white and Black drivers in traffic stops. They suggest that police treat drivers differently depending on their race, raising the need for training on diversity and fairness for traffic cops. While the media tends to focus on fatal police encounters, nonfatal police procedures, such as traffic stops, may also be influenced by racial discrimination. Given that such police-civilian encounters are common, racial bias in traffic stops plays a large role in the everyday lives of minority communities. 
Of course, these findings have some limitations. The BJS report provided data only to one decimal place, inhibiting their accuracy. Due to rounding happening early in data collection, it is impossible to calculate a final uncertainty or error with results. There was no explicit data on the use of force after a search, so I assumed that the likelihood of the use of force in a search would be equal to use of force in any police-civilian interaction. This could result in an overestimation in the police use of force in traffic stops. But importantly, these findings still suggest that non-fatal police-civilian encounters carry the potential for racial discrimination in places as public and commonplace as the highway. It is critical not only to address racial bias in fatal police shootings but also in the interactions Black citizens have with the police everyday to improve equality within our criminal justice system. Otherwise, racial bias may continue passing undetected, harming Black citizens everyday.  



Works Cited: 

“Bayesian Networks.” Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 2012. https://www.ics.uci.edu/~rickl/courses/cs-171/2012-wq-cs171/2012-wq-cs171-lecture-slides/2012wq171-17-BayesianNetworks.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct. 2020.
United States, Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, et al. Contacts Between Police and the Public, 2015, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Oct. 2018. www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpp15.pdf.  Accessed 20 Sept. 2020.




 The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
​
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​