Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Enabling Ableism: Election Laws and COVID-19 Obstacles Prevent Many Cognitively Impaired Individuals from Casting their Votes

10/28/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
By: Hailie Goldsmith
Sophomore in the College of Arts and Sciences; majoring in Philosophy, Politics and Economics and minoring in Hispanic Studies.

As citizens nationwide continue to cast their votes early in anticipation of Election Day on November 3rd, the novel coronavirus presents a unique and pressing challenge for all registered voters. While some will choose to vote in-person on Election Day, many voters applied for mail-in-ballots to reduce the risk of exposing themselves to the coronavirus. While COVID-19 hinders ease and accessibility with regards to voting, the pandemic especially affects older individuals, particularly residents of convalescent care centers with cognitive impairments. In fact, more than 23 million adults in the United States experience some variation of a limiting mental disorder, ranging from dementia to a learning disability [1].  
Unfortunately, a widespread misunderstanding of voting laws disenfranchises many older cognitively impaired citizens. In nursing homes and assisted living facilities, the caregivers or family members might wrongly assume that a cognitive impairment or medical diagnosis automatically renders a person legally unable to vote. To absolve misperceptions about what level of mental capacity one must possess to legally cast a vote, the Penn Memory Center released a comprehensive guide in conjunction with the American Bar Association titled Assisting Cognitively Impaired Individuals with Voting: A Quick Guide. According to the guide, if an individual can respond “yes” and indicate a desire to vote when asked, then he or she “can also indicate a choice among available ballot selections” and should receive assistance in voting [2]. All voters possess private and personal reasons for their choices of candidates, and no one typically questions the merit of decision-making for cognitively healthy individuals. A voter’s reasons for their decisions should not determine the adequacy of their selections. 
In fact, the American Disabilities Act, along with other federal laws, legally encodes this aforementioned equal accessibility to vote for all individuals regardless of the level of cognitive functioning. Specifically, Title II of the ADA legally ensures that people with disabilities possess a full and equal opportunity to vote, which covers voter registration and the casting of ballots [3]. According to the ADA, state and local governments assume the responsibility of making voting procedures accessible. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 serves as another major piece of federal legislation that requires election officials to adapt voting procedures for blind or cognitively disabled voters. In addition, the Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act of 1984 requires voting locations to contain physically accessible options for elderly individuals [3]. With regards to voter registration efforts, the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 specifically aims to increase voter registration rates of individuals with disabilities.
Despite the extensive legislation that exists to protect cognitively impaired individuals’ voting rights, individual states still attempt to disenfranchise certain voters based on mental disabilities or cognitive limitations. Thirty-nine states and Washington D.C. allow judges to revoke voting rights from individuals with mental disorders spanning from schizophrenia to Down syndrome. These “incompetence” laws deem certain individuals unworthy of voting when judges decide that they lack the mental capacity to make complicated decisions [4]. Sometimes this ruling occurs when a cognitively impaired individual receives a legal guardian and the judge simultaneously deems the individual unable to vote in elections. Each year tens of thousands of Americans with disabilities lose their right to vote as a result of legal guardianship proceedings [4]. The disenfranchisement of disabled individuals leads to controversy about whether or not limits should be placed on voting eligibility. 
While all individuals with cognitive impairments hold the legal right to vote, many require assistance from family members or other peers to complete their ballots. The Penn Memory and ABA guide includes many suggestions of various techniques for minimizing communication barriers. These techniques include listening carefully, repeating and clarifying information, asking ballot questions one at a time, speaking in short sentences, evaluating and responding to changes in body language, and maintaining a respectful and understanding tone throughout the process of filling out the ballot. Though care providers and family members can legally assist voters in filling out their ballots, the helper should only fill out choices indicated by the voter and cannot provide recommendations for how to vote or who to vote for [2]. 
Arising from the circumstance of voting assistance, the potential avenues for voter fraud act as a counter-argument against allowing individuals with cognitive impairments to cast their votes. If someone requires assistance from a caretaker in filling out his or her ballot, the caretaker might take advantage of the situation and fill out his or her personal preferences on the ballot, effectively voting twice [4]. In this case, an incapacited individual leaves his or her ballot susceptible to interference, threatening the integrity of democratic processes. However, at what point can individuals be deemed incapable of voting based on mental capabilities? States should adopt clear standards for determining and assessing one’s mental and cognitive capacity to vote so as to dispel confusion from court cases and guardianship proceedings. Some states follow the aforementioned standard provided by the American Bar Association. If an individual can effectively express his or her desire to vote, then an individual can capably vote [4]. 
Given COVID-19 restrictions which severely limit visitors at nursing homes, cognitively impaired voters encounter even more obstacles with properly submitting their ballots. Even if residents of nursing homes and long-term care facilities want to vote, they can no longer easily request help from family members [1]. In light of these challenges presented by COVID-19, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently released a memorandum in which CMS “affirm[ed] the continued right of nursing home residents to exercise their right to vote” [5]. The memorandum strives to hold state and local governments as well as nursing home administrators accountable and emphasizes the importance of ensuring that residents of nursing homes still exercise their legal right to vote despite the additional difficulties and hurdles presented by the pandemic.
Mobile polling, which Vermont experimented with in the 2008 election, represents one innovative solution to assisting voters living in nursing homes. This option enlists the help of trained election officials who visit nursing homes and help cognitively impaired residents adequately fill out their ballots [6]. However, election boards in many voting precincts do not receive nearly enough funding to conduct sufficient voter outreach efforts, especially to voters in nursing homes. This particular issue speaks volumes about the inaccessibility of voting for all U.S. citizens. Filling out and submitting ballots causes confusion among many voters, regardless of mental capabilities, so election boards should receive more funding to increase transparency and ease in the voting process. 
Federal laws, such as the ADA and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, attempt to eliminate ableist restrictions from voter registration processes and ballot submissions; however, these laws lack any legal enforcement measures to oversee that disabled or cognitively impared individuals receive the assistance necessary to cast their ballots. In a year where voting, a basic right of U.S. citizenship, has become a particularly arduous and confusing task due to the coronavirus, election officials should not overlook disabled citizens who deserve to fulfill their constitutional right to vote. 
The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
Sources:
  1. Span, Paula. “Having Dementia Doesn’t Mean You Can’t Vote.” The New York Times. October 14, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/14/health/election-voting-seniors-dementia.html
  2. “Assisting Cognitively Impaired Individuals with Voting: A Quick Guide.” American Bar Association and the Penn Memory Center. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/law_aging/2020-voting-guide.pdf 
  3. “The Americans with Disabilities Act and Other Federal Laws Protecting the Rights of Voters with Disabilities.” U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section. September 2014. https://www.ada.gov/ada_voting/ada_voting_ta.htm 
  4. “Thousands Lose Right to Vote Under ‘Incompetence’ Laws.” Matt Vasilogambros. The Pew Charitable Trusts. March 21, 2018. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2018/03/21/thousands-lose-right-to-vote-under-incompetence-laws 
  5. “Compliance with Residents’ Rights Requirement related to Nursing Home Residents’ Right to Vote.” The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. October 5, 2020. https://www.cms.gov/medicareprovider-enrollment-and-certificationsurveycertificationgeninfopolicy-and-memos-states-and/compliance-residents-rights-requirement-related-nursing-home-residents-right-vote 
  6. Karlawish, Jason et al. “Bringing the Vote to Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities: A Study of the Benefits and Challenges of Mobile Polling.” Election Law Journal. March 14 2011. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/elj.2010.0065 
The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​