Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Don’t jump on the bandwagon just yet…

4/24/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Grace Lee
Grace Lee is a sophomore in the College of Arts and Sciences.

​
Lyft, the second largest rideshare service in the U.S., pulled ahead of its long-time competitor Uber by being the first of its kind to go public on Friday, March 29th, 2019. The future looks promising for investors, as the company ended its first day with a market valuation of $22.2 billion [1]. However, amidst all the hurrah of the trading comes complications with regulators, and there are a number of legal risks associated with Lyft going public. This is expected with decoupling – when a new technology disrupts an existing industry, in Lyft’s case, the public transportation and taxi service industry [2]. These risks were noted in Lyft’s filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission while registering for its initial public offering [3].
One of the most substantial legal risks that Lyft has to consider relates to a core part of its business model, its employees. Lyft currently classifies its drivers as independent contractors; however, labor activists are pushing for ride-hailing app drivers to be classified as employees. Further, the California Supreme Court has already introduced a three-part test to determine whether someone should be considered an employee or a contractor. Requirements for consideration as an independent contractor are outlined in Dynamex v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County as follows [4].  

(A) that the worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact,
(B) that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business, and
(C) that the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business, the worker should be considered an employee and the hiring business an employer under the suffer or permit to work standard in wage orders.

Many employment lawyers have stated that this test will provide more protection for gig economy workers. As Lyft has already faced thousands of individual claims related to driver classification, these reforms may be necessary for dealing with the magnitude of the problem. Lyft drivers make about $17.50 per hour and do not receive any employee benefits. Lyft argues that by changing current classifications, it will suffer financial costs such as penalties for withholding taxes, minimum wage requirements, and employee benefits [5]. How Lyft deals with these consequences going forward will set a precedent for similar companies.

Another risk Lyft must consider is its expansion within the transportation industry. In 2018, Lyft acquired “Motivate,” America’s biggest bikeshare service [6]. These scooters will offer more mobility for pedestrians, but at the cost of increased safety concerns. These will complicate local traffic regulations, and officials are still grappling with how to regulate these safety concerns.

One of the most exciting prospects for the ridesharing industry is the future of autonomous vehicles. Lyft has announced that their future depends on autonomous vehicles and has dedicated an entire division to self-driving and another section of its risk management to autonomous vehicles [7]. Officials are still trying to figure out how autonomous vehicles would be regulated, and these uncertainties could lead to steep costs. Additionally, legislators must address the question of whether regulatory authority exists at the state or local level.

Data privacy is another risk Lyft should consider moving forward, especially in the aftermath of the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica data privacy scandal. Rideshare companies rely on access to personal and location data, and the rise of big data has questioned the meaning of privacy [8]. As legislators move forward with creating new data privacy laws and tweaking existing ones, they will have to carefully consider consumer privacy.

Regarding the environment, Lyft filed a brief in federal appeals court in February of 2019 on greenhouse gas standards [9]. The brief supported a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), arguing that the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards set under the Obama administration for 2021-2026 should be reconsidered since Trump’s EPA has not finalized its standards yet.

This reinforces Lyft’s stance on taking action to offset emissions from its cars and become carbon neutral last year. In its brief, the company’s attorneys wrote, “Lyft relies on EPA’s greenhouse gas standards both to reduce fuel costs for drivers and to help make its rides carbon-neutral. Drivers that use Lyft need fuel-efficient cars to make the service more economic, and both Lyft and its riders count on that fuel efficiency to reduce costs and protect the environment.” They further argued that "Lyft must rely on the automotive industry to make fuel-efficient vehicles prevalent and affordable. That will only happen if automakers invest in efficiency-increasing technologies, and that investment is most likely if EPA has future standards on its books today that drive that change."

The EPA requested to dismiss the lawsuit in November, but a three-judge panel for the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the request [10]. The court has not yet set a date for oral arguments, but it looks like the law will have the final say.

Overall, Lyft has many legal risks to consider going forward, whether they are related to worker classification, safety concerns, autonomous vehicles, data privacy, or greenhouse gas emissions. Lyft seems to be aware of this and has increased the number of “legal” job openings at Lyft [11]. It will be interesting to observe how Lyft addresses these matters as investors are allowed a voice in Lyft’s operations.

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

​References
  1. Salinas, Sara. "Lyft Pops in Trading Debut, Settles to Modest Gains." CNBC. Last modified March 29, 2019. Accessed April 4, 2019. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/29/lyft-ipo-stock-starts-trading-on-public-market.html.
  2. Last modified May 22, 2018. Accessed April 4, 2019. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/21/lyft-2018-disruptor-50.html.
  3. Lyft, 2019 Annual Report, accessed April 4, 2019, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1759509/000119312519059849/d633517ds1.htm
  4. Farivar, Cyrus. "New Court Ruling Could Force Uber, Lyft to Convert Drivers to Employees." Arstechnica. Last modified May 2, 2018. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/05/new-court-ruling-could-force-uber-lyft-to-convert-drivers-to-employees/.
  5. Price, Rob. "Lyft Warns the Push to Have Ride-hailing Drivers Classified as Employees Could Seriously Harm Its Business." Business Insider. Last modified March 1, 2019. https://www.businessinsider.com/lyft-ipo-drivers-employees-contractors-2019-3.
  6. O'Kane, Sean. "Lyft Buys the Biggest Bike-sharing Company in the US." The Verge. Last modified July 2, 2018. https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/2/17526892/lyft-buys-motivate-bike-sharing-expansion.
  7. Dickey, Megan Rose. "Here's How Lyft Envisions Self-driving Cars Communicating with Pedestrians." TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/11/lyft-self-driving-car-communication-patent/.
  8. Symantec. "How Ridesharing Services Can Take Your Privacy for a Ride." Privacy. https://us.norton.com/internetsecurity-privacy-ridesharing-privacy-ride.html.
  9. Miller, Cheryl. "Lyft Bashes EPA for 'Head-Scratching' Drive to Relax Car Pollution Rules." The Recorder. Last modified February 14, 2019. https://www.law.com/therecorder/2019/02/14/lyft-bashes-epa-for-head-scratching-drive-to-relax-car-pollution-rules/?slreturn=20190304210113.
  10. "Lyft Backs Legal Challenge to Trump Rollback of Fuel Standards." Society of Environmental Journalists. https://www.sej.org/headlines/lyft-backs-legal-challenge-trump-rollback-fuel-standards.
  11. Fruhlinger, Joshua. "Some Alternative Data You Should Know about Lyft as It Goes Public." Thinknum. Last modified March 29, 2019. https://media.thinknum.com/articles/lyft-goes-public-breakdown-analysis/.
​Photo Credit: Shutterstock
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​