Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Disney Faces Classic Work-Under-Hire Copyright Battles with Creators

3/24/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Image Source: “The Importance of Intellectual Property (and How to Protect It).” Equinox Law Group, September 7, 2021. https://equinoxbusinesslaw.com/blog/the-importance-of-intellectual-property-and-how-to-protect-it/.
By Rachel Gu

Rachel Gu is a senior at the University of Pennsylvania studying Bioengineering.

Generation Z’s most loved cinematic characters of the Marvel universe have recently become the main characters of one of The Walt Disney Company’s largest asset battles to date. Through distinguished Intellectual Property lawyer Marc Toberoff, five of the original Marvel Comics creators served Marvel Entertainment–owned by Disney–with notices of copyright termination under section 304(c) of the Copyright Act. These creators include comic illustrators Steve Ditko and Don Heck, heirs of writers Don Rico and Gene Colan, and comic writer and artist Lawrence D. Lieber–who is the younger brother of the deceased chief writer and editor of Marvel Comics, Stan Lee. Toberoff’s clients seek to reclaim copyright ownership through copyright termination for their characters Doctor Strange, Black Widow, Hawkeye, Captain Marvel, Falcon, Blade, and the Wizard, all of which provide large sources of revenue for Disney through films, television shows, and merchandise. Consequently, Marvel filed lawsuits in return to invalidate the termination notices. If Toberoff is successful, Marvel would lose full copyright ownership as soon as June 2023. [1]
The current reigning version of Copyright Law is dictated by the Copyright Revision Act of 1976,  but this revision took effect on January 1st, 1978 and only applies to works created after this date. [2] Prior to this revision, the 1909 Copyright Act served as the rule of copyright law. Because the Marvel characters in question were created in the 1960s and prior to the Copyright Revision Act, the 1909 Copyright Act applies to these lawsuits.​

In Section 26 of the 1909 Copyright Act, the definition of a copyright author included “an employer in the case of a work made for hire.” Subsequently, courts developed an “instance and expense test” to determine whether a work was made for hire, considering factors such as the existence of a written agreement that acknowledges a hired authorship, payment of wages in return for the work, or the right of the employer to supervise the creation of the work. [3] Essentially, if the creator was given an opportunity–or “instance”–to create the work all while the work was being largely funded by an “employer,” then the work was made for hire. 
​

Using this definition of work for hire, Black Widow, for example, seems to clearly fall under a work made for hire since writer Stan Lee was a fully employed paid editor. While Rico and Heck were not traditional employees and instead freelancers paid on a page rate, their work also seems to fall under the “instance and expense” test, where Marvel provided the motivation–or instance­–and paid for the work done. Other characters similarly fall under the same fate.

Toberoff argues that the current interpretation of “work made for hire” is too broad and needs to be redefined. He contends that the characters were all created when the creators worked as freelancers or independent contractors, thus differentiating them from traditional employees of Marvel–the only standard that should actually count as a work made for hire. [4]

Toberoff has been involved in similar cases in the past. In August 2013, he represented Jack Kirby in serving copyright termination on Spider-Man, X-Men, the Hulk, and Thor, but the 2nd U.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court ruling that rejected the termination request due to Kirby having created his materials as a work made for hire. Just before the case was brought to the Supreme Court, the case was settled. Toberoff’s attempts to serve a copyright termination of Superman, on behalf of creators Jerry Siegel and Joe Schuster, to DC Comics ended in a settlement. [5] While no successful legal precedent in copyright termination in favor of the creator was made, Toberoff said he thinks of the settlement as a win. [6]

 The Kirby case took place in the Second Circuit, which, along with the Ninth Circuit, is home to all five of the current lawsuits. This legal precedent does not bode well for Toberoff’s current case. In fact, both the Ninth and Second circuits utilize the “instance and expense test” for any copyrighted work made before 1978.

If in the small chance that Toberoff’s clients prevail, Marvel would not entirely lose its profit stream from these famous characters. The termination of these copyrights would just lead to joint ownership between the creators and Marvel. Copyright law holds that any owner can exploit the copyright ownership without permission from the creators, but they must share the profits. However, given that the Kirby case almost reached the Supreme Court, Toberoff still has a small shot of potentially redefining a work made for hire.

 The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

[1] Barnes, Brooks. "Disney Sues to Keep Complete Rights to Marvel Characters." New York Times, September 24, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/24/business/media/disney-marvel-copyright-lawsuits.html.
[2] Hull, Geoffrey P. "Copyright Act of 1976 (1976)." THE FIRST AMENDMENT ENCYCLOPEDIA, 2009. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1072/Copyright-act-of-1976.
[3] "Work Made for Hire under the 1909 Copyright Law," April 2005. U.S. Copyright Office Release, Appendix E. https://copyright.gov/comp3/chap2100/doc/appendixE-madeforhire.pdf.
[4] Moss, Aaron. "What's Really Going On In Marvel's Copyright Termination Lawsuits." Copyright Lately (blog). Entry posted September 26, 2021. https://copyrightlately.com/marvel-copyright-termination-lawsuits/.
[5] Gardener, Eriq. "Marvel Suing to Keep Rights to 'Avengers' Characters From Copyright Termination." The Hollywood Reporter. September 24, 2021. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/ marvel-suing-avengers-copyright-termination-1235020110/.
[6] Thomas, David. “Bang! Pow! Lawyer foes square off again in Marvel copyright fight” Reuters. September 18, 2021. https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/bang-pow-lawyer-foes-square-off-again-marvel-copyright-fight-2021-09-28/




0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​