Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Consensual Sex Between Minors in India: A Case for legalization

2/23/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Suprateek Neogi
Suprateek Neogi is a fourth-year student at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab studying Law and specializing in Business Laws.


The law in India relating to sexual acts with minors has been specialized in recent years with the Protection of Children against Sexual Offences, 2012 (“POCSO”). Earlier, the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”), which deals with general substantive criminal law, was used for persecuting the accused for committing crimes against children.

Unfortunately, sexual abuse of children has only recently been publicly acknowledged as a problem in India, which is why POCSO has been a welcome development in India. Despite being well-intentioned and detailed, POCSO has one lacuna. It does not differentiate between sexual acts between consensual minors and sexual acts between minors and adults. [1]

The last decade, from 2005 to 2015, saw an increase of 529% in total reported crimes against children and an increase of 408% in cases of ‘penetrative sexual assault’, including ‘aggravated penetrative sexual assault’.

POCSO has led to increased reporting of crimes against children and faster litigation for ensuring justice to the victims. In 2016, 37,269 cases of sexual offences against children (36,022 under the POCSO Act and 1,427 under Section 377 IPC) were registered, which constitutes 34.8% of total crimes against children. [2] This increase in reporting has been due to increased awareness and a specialized Act for the protection of children, i.e., POCSO. POCSO is a special law which criminalises a range of acts against children including child rape, harassment, and exploitation for pornography. The law also mandates the setting up of Special Courts to facilitate speedy trials in cases of child sexual abuse. [3]

Without a doubt, the passing of POCSO has been a significant and progressive step in securing children’s rights and furthering the cause of protecting children against sexual abuse. POCSO is often applied in relation with related legislation, the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, to clamp down on child marriages.

The letter and spirit of the law, which defines a child as anyone less than 18 years of age, is to protect children from sexual abuse. The intent of the legislature in passing this law was to make special provisions for punishing sexual offences against children.

POCSO, however, criminalizes all sexual behaviour for individuals under the age of 18. In today’s day and age, consensual sex between minors has become an accepted norm, at least amongst teenagers living in urban areas. Despite that, legislation has been slow to stay in tune with the times. Hence, criminalising all sexual behaviour for individuals less than 18 years of age can be problematic. For instance, considering a child of 17 years of age as a criminal deserving rigorous imprisonment because he had consensual sexual relations with another 17-year-old is not an appropriate measure. Even well-meaning laws like POCSO can have unintended negative consequences.

Apart from an outdated moral viewpoint being imposed on children, another reason why consensual sex between minors has been in a legal grey area is because of what the Indian law considers as valid consent. The Supreme Court of India, in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Balu (2004) has held that consent given by a minor is not considered to be valid consent in the eyes of law. [4] This has been reiterated in many cases of the Supreme Court and subordinate courts.

In today’s day and age, the abovementioned rationale for the judgement, or ratio decidendi, [5] should not be extended to consensual sex between minors. Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”), of which India is a signatory, holds that everyone has the right to the protection of the law against arbitrary interference with his or her privacy. Consensual sexual acts fall under the purview of right to privacy of a human being. This has been recognized under Article 21 by the judgement of a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court in the landmark case of Justice Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017). [6] Considering consensual sexual acts as a crime violates the right to privacy of the minors.

Recently, Madras High Court has been passing progressive judgements, setting examples for its contemporary High Courts. This includes the case of Arunkumar v. The Inspector General of Registration (2019). [7] The High Court held that a marriage solemnized where at least one of the parties is a transgender person, both professing Hindu religion, is a valid marriage in terms of Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Registrar of Marriages is bound to register the same. 

In the case of Sabari v. Inspector of Police (2018), the Madras High Court has said in passing, or as obiter dicta, [8] that consensual sexual activity between minors above the age of 16 years of age should not be considered to be a criminal activity. [9] Since it was said as obiter dicta, it cannot be enforced as law, but it has persuasive value for future judicial and legislative decisions. The Court considered this a logical conclusion from a consideration of ground realities and post-modern moralities of this decade.

Many countries have 16 years or below that as the age of consent for sexual relations. Many American states, some countries in Europe, Japan, Canada, Australia, China, and Russia all fall into this category. Therefore, the rights of the child (up to 18 years of age) might be protected in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, but the age of consent can safely be reduced from 18 to 16. [10]

The High Court had suggested as an obiter dicta that the definition of 'Child' under Section 2(d) of the POCSO Act can be redefined as 16 instead of 18.  Any consensual sex after the age of 16 or bodily contact or allied acts can be excluded from the rigorous provisions of the POCSO Act. Such sexual assault, if it is so defined, can be tried under a new provision. This was said in passing, or as obiter dicta by the High Court, and does not construe as the law before passing of the appropriate Amendment to POCSO.

The said provision can be added as an Amendment to distinguish the cases of a teenage relationship after the age of 16, from the cases of sexual assault on children below 16 years. The Act can be amended to the effect that the age of the offender ought not to be more than five years or so than the consensual victim girl of 16 years or more. This is so that the impressionable age of the victim girl cannot be taken advantage of by a person who is much older and has crossed the age of presumable infatuation or innocence.

This progressive judgement of the Madras High Court shows that Indian society is now truly modernizing and the law, albeit slowly, is catching up.

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

Sources

[1] Section 2(d), Protection of Children against Sexual Offences, 2012.
[2] Ali, Bharti et al. “Implementation of the POCSO Act: Goals, Gaps and Challenges - Study of Cases of Special Courts in Delhi & Mumbai (2012 - 2015)”. HAQ: Centre for Child Rights (2017). Last accessed date November 18, 2019.  
[3] Section 28, Protection of Children against Sexual Offences, 2012.
[4] State of Madhya Pradesh v. Balu, SC Appeal (Crl.) 1273 of 2004.
[5] “Ratio Decidendi”. Oxford Reference. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100405351.
[6] Justice Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.
[7] Arunkumar v. Inspector General of Registration, WP(MD) No. 4125 of 2019, dated 22-04-2019
[8] Sabari v. Inspector of Police  WP. (MD). Nos. 19651 of 2018.
[9] Id.
[10] Vij, R.K. “India should consider lowering the age of consent”. Hindustan Times (2019). Last accessed date November 18, 2019. https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/india-should-consider-lowering-the-age-of-consent/story-BlWpuGuaQu93q4GdSsJ6KJ.html.

 Photo credit: GirlTalkHQ

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​