Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Chemical Spills and Spillover Effects: Legal Responsibility, Ethics, and Accountability in the East Palestine Train Derailment

3/17/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Sajan Srivastava 

Sajan Srivastava is a sophomore from Piedmont, California, studying Economics.

The February 2023 derailment of a freight train in East Palestine, Ohio, raises profound  questions of who bears the legal, ethical, and practical responsibility for the environmental disaster. The Ohio Department of Natural Resources has estimated that the disaster, which released such toxic chemicals as vinyl chloride, has so far killed roughly 43,000 fish within a 5-mile radius of the derailment site. Considering that the city’s streams connect to the nearby Ohio River through five streams, it is abundantly clear that any hazardous chemicals released in the derailment have the potential to affect communities and ecosystems far beyond East Palestine and even Ohio. Nine states border the Ohio River watershed, and the river’s drainage into the Mississippi River poses a threat to the economic state of much of the country [1]. With the dangers of the released chemicals to humans unclear, it remains ambiguous whether government agencies can ethically advise residents to return to their homes and where the liability for potential damages to public health and economic well-being ultimately falls.

The issue with assigning legal liability lies in the fact that the freight rail industry and the federal government are deeply intertwined. Norfolk Southern, the company whose train caught fire and subsequently derailed in East Palestine, is an independent corporation with public shareholders; however, its safety standards are regulated by the Surface Transportation Board and the Federal Railroad Administration, both of which are governmental agencies [
2]. According to Ian Naish, a former safety investigator for the Transportation Safety Board of Canada, Norfolk Southern had been engaging in cost-cutting practices without adequately considering the risk associated with them. For example, the train had 149 cars, one less than the Association of American Railroads deems “very long”. This measure, which increases the momentum of the train, has the potential to impart more substantial damage if something goes wrong. In addition, one of the cars involved in the derailment did not meet the standard required for strength, given its chemical contents [3]. It seems apparent that Norfolk Southern did not fully adhere to safety protocols and played a role in escalating the impact of the incident. 


Yet, deficiencies in the safety regulations that are in place to prevent such incidents also have exacerbated the situation. For example, a safety regulation requiring some freight trains to have updated braking systems was repealed in 2018. In another instance, the Transportation Department found that the Federal Railroad Administration’s regulations regarding hazardous materials were insufficient in 2016, leading to a substantial increase in violations involving hazardous materials [4]. While several railroad companies – including Norfolk Southern – lobbied for the deregulation that enabled these weak policies, the federal government still bears the responsibility of setting safe standards; since the train’s routing began in Illinois, the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution holds the federal government accountable to regulate it [5]. 

Environmental officials in Ohio have called on the state Attorney General’s office to bring forth civil actions against Norfolk Southern [7]. Moreover, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has already posited that Norfolk Southern will be responsible for environmental mitigation efforts, invoking the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. In late February, the Agency ordered the company to not only determine the extent of soil and water contamination but also reimburse the EPA for all cleaning, testing, and decontamination efforts that follow [6]. The EPA’s actions suggest that the federal government intends to devoid itself of as much responsibility as possible for the derailment and implicitly places the liability for the entire derailment on Norfolk Southern. However, it may be difficult to disentangle the legal liability for the cleanup efforts from that of the derailment itself. The issue at hand becomes murkier when considering the fact that other government agencies, such as Governor Mike DeWine’s office, have insisted that the impact on residents is negligible and vouched for the lack of hazardous conditions in the town, despite ongoing water monitoring. It is possible that government agencies are promoting an expeditious return to normalcy while leaving the liability for health damages to Norfolk Southern [1]. 

Further complicating matters, the thousands of lawsuits filed against Norfolk Southern have crossed state lines; due to East Palestine’s location on the border with Pennsylvania, the company has fielded claims from residents in both states. As such, the jurisdiction of the lawsuits is also ambiguous. In November 2022, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard the case of Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., in which Robert Mallory, a former employee of Norfolk Southern, had filed a lawsuit against the company in Pennsylvania for exposure to toxic chemicals, despite the fact that he had only worked in Virginia and Ohio. Mallory was able to do so because Pennsylvania has a unique code that gives the state judicial branch the authority to exercise its jurisdiction over “foreign corporations”. The case raised the question of whether one may file a lawsuit in any state that has such jurisdiction. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has deemed this unconstitutional, determining that Norfolk Southern should not be required to oppose the suit in Pennsylvania; however, the U.S. Supreme Court will soon hear the appeal case. In the East Palestine derailment, it is clear that the train would have eventually passed through Pennsylvania land had the derailment not occurred. However, the fact that the derailment occurred just before suggests that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. could radically shape the validity of the lawsuits filed in Pennsylvania [9]. 

A freight train derailment in Paulsboro, NJ, in 2012 involving the same toxic chemical released in East Palestine provides some precedent for the upcoming legal proceedings. Following that incident, Paulsboro residents attempted to sue railroad company Conrail for the health consequences and economic losses incurred by the chemical spill and subsequent evacuation of the town. In that case, Conrail had elected to engage in individual private settlements with over 70% of Paulsboro residents, which prevented those residents from engaging in further legal action against the company. As a result, a federal judge determined that there was insufficient evidence of “unreimbursed, nonmedical expenses” from the remaining plaintiffs, thus making it difficult to determine whether the losses came as a direct result of Conrail’s negligence, eliminating the possibility of a class action suit [8]. 

Ultimately, the consequences of the derailment may not be determined in the foreseeable future. Due to the complex geographic, political, and legal consequences of the incident, there exist conflicts of interest among each of the involved parties who seek to absolve themselves of the responsibility for the disaster and the community's health. It is undoubtedly vital that a thorough analysis of the impacts on environmental and public health is  conducted without further delay. Yet, state and federal agencies appear determined to subject Norfolk Southern to legal punishment before any conclusions can be drawn. The return to the East Palestine community seems premature without any conclusive testing results. Both Norfolk Southern and the government bear the responsibility to compensate the community for the damages and ensure that the region is safe from contaminants, but the escape from liability appears to be taking precedence over adherence to their ethical duty.

References

[1]https://www.usatoday.com/story/graphics/2023/02/17/train-derailment-ohio-explained-graphics/11251530002/
[2]https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/economics-business-and-labor/businesses-and-occupations/norfolk-southern-corp
[3]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/business/energy-environment/norfolk-southern-derailment-safety.html
[4]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ohio-train-derailment-cause-b2283433.html
[5]https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C3-1/ALDE_00013403/#:~:text=The%20Commerce%20Clause%20gives%20Congress,a%20source%20of%20federal%20power[6]https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-orders-norfolk-southern-conduct-all-cleanup-actions-associated-east-palestine#:~:text=WASHINGTON%20%E2%80%94%20Today%2C%20the%20U.S.%20Environmental,Palestine%2C%20Ohio%2C%20train%20derailment
[7] https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/24/us/ohio-train-derailment-east-palestine-friday/index.html
[8]https://www.thedailyjournal.com/story/news/local/new-jersey/2014/08/21/judge-limits-lawsuits-nj-train-derailment/14384907/
[9]https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-1168#:~:text=Norfolk%20Southern%20Railway%20objected%20to,The%20Pennsylvania%20Supreme%20Court%20affirmed 

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​