Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Censorship: Protecting Democracy or Violating the First Amendment?

2/18/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Source: Unsplash
By Hailie Goldsmith
​
Hailie Goldsmith is a sophomore in the College of Arts and Sciences, majoring in Philosophy, Politics and Economics and minoring in Hispanic Studies.
In the age of omnipresent social media platforms, a majority of speech and dialogue now takes place online. For this reason, conflicts discerning which speech falls outside the protection of the First Amendment now frequently occur on an online stage rather than in-person. These conflicts are amplified by the wide-reaching arena compared to the minimal reaches of interpersonal interactions. Because social media can expose millions of people to information in a short period of time, speech can result in real actions and potentially violent consequences.
Unsurprisingly, social media has recently fallen under immense scrutiny in the wake of the Capitol riots that were incited by Donald Trump’s months-long onslaught of election fraud claims. At the core of this incited insurrection was his social media campaign. Even in 2017, Donald Trump’s Twitter account had amassed about 40 million followers [1]. Though social media platforms censor posts very infrequently and typically encourage free and unrestricted discussion, social media sites did choose to remove Donald Trump’s accounts from their platforms as an emergency response to the Capitol insurrection. Major sites like Twitter and Facebook banned Donald Trump’s accounts from their platforms in an effort to silence any violence-provoking speech. 
Social media sites hold great power over regulating speech in online forums. For instance, Reddit removed the Donald Trump subreddit, and TikTok removed any videos labeled with #stormthecapitol [2]. The vast deplatforming effort that aimed to de-escalate claims of false election results and prevent another violent attack on U.S. government landmarks did in fact starkly reduce the spreading of lies about election fraud [2].  However, these decisions by prominent social media companies raise serious questions pertaining to speech regulation.
Some strong First Amendment proponents believe that social media platforms should allow Donald Trump to continue propagating false claims about a stolen election because of a firm commitment to the “marketplace of ideas,” which they felt should be untouched by any form of interference or policing [2]. According to the American Bar Association, there exist two major categories of arguments that justify the protection of the First Amendment rights: the marketplace of ideas and individual self-fulfillment. The marketplace of ideas refers to free and unhindered debate of ideas and opinions, and individual self-fulfillment refers to an individual’s right to self-expression for the intrinsic purpose of growth and identity development. In either of these two scenarios, government intervention violates the First Amendment [3]. Bipartisan advocates for the protection of free speech, such as the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, corroborate this and are strongly in favor of allowing all forms of political speech in order to encourage a free exchange of a wide array of perspectives [4]. 
Contrary to Donald Trump’s outcries, social media platforms, including Twitter and Facebook, did not violate the First Amendment in banning his accounts and regulating content. The First Amendment protects U.S. citizens’ right to speech, free from any government intervention, but the First Amendment says nothing about private companies and their decision to implement their own speech and conduct guidelines. In this case, the decisions of tech companies to intervene in online dialogue does not legally interfere with the First Amendment [5]. Moreover, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 legally permits social media companies to regulate and monitor users’ posts and content according to their discretion [5]. 
Though Twitter, Facebook, and other tech giants do not legally violate the First Amendment, some argue that these private companies should still be subjected to greater oversight and regulation because these major tech platforms hold significant power and influence over the exchange of so much information in the United States [6]. In fact, an estimated 3.5 billion people actively used social media in 2019 [7]. Though private social media companies do not legally have to adhere to the First Amendment rights of individual users, these companies still effectively control and moderate online discourse, and the American Bar Association proposes the expansion of the First Amendment to also limit interference by sites like Facebook and Twitter [3]. The ABA presents an important thesis: “When a private actor has control over online communications and online forums, these private actors are analogous to a governmental actor” [3]. 
Although the decision to ban Donald Trump from social media platforms removed a source of information that spread lies and incited violence, this decision demonstrates the ability of big tech to limit speech and curate the particular information available to Internet users [2]. In this case, executives in Silicon Valley, not government institutions, maintain the power to determine the outcomes of difficult conflicts involving the First Amendment and free speech disagreements [2]. Some feel as though government regulation is better suited for protecting the First Amendment while still being careful to eliminate false information and violent language. For years, there has been disagreement among constitutional law experts with regards to how strictly or loosely the First Amendment rights should be interpreted and applied—how much freedom of speech does this amendment actually grant individuals? However, free speech should be monitored to some degree in any case for the assurance that it does not ever reach an unrestricted and unruly point when it can undermine democracy, as was seen with the Capitol insurrection.

References
[1] Caplan, Lincoln. “Should Facebook and Twitter Be Regulated Under the First Amendment?” Wired. October 11, 2017. https://www.wired.com/story/should-facebook-and-twitter-be-regulated-under-the-first-amendment/ 
[2] Bazelon, Emily. “Why is Big Tech Policing Speech? Because the Government Isn’t.” The New York Times. January 26, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/26/magazine/free-speech-tech.html 
[3] Hudson, David. “In the Age of Social Media, Expand the Reach of the First Amendment.” American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/the-ongoing-challenge-to-define-free-speech/in-the-age-of-socia-media-first-amendment/ 
[4] “Facebook Oversight Board Should Delay Ruling on Suspension of Trump, Knight Institute Says.” Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. February 11, 2021. https://knightcolumbia.org/content/facebook-oversight-board-should-delay-ruling-on-suspension-of-trump-knight-institute-says 
[5] Sonnemaker, Tyler. “Twitter and Facebook both banned Trump from their platforms. Here’s why that doesn’t violate the First Amendment—or any other laws.” Business Insider. January 9, 2021. https://www.businessinsider.com/why-trump-bans-from-twitter-facebook-dont-violate-first-amendment-2021-1 
[6] Phillips, Amber. “No, Twitter is not violating Trump’s freedom of speech.” The Washington Post. May 29, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/29/no-twitter-did-not-violate-trumps-freedom-speech/?arc404=true 
[7] Digital 2019. Hootsuite. https://www.hootsuite.com/pages/digital-in-2019 
 
The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​