Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
  • Submissions
  • The Roundtable
  • Full Issues
  • Sponsors
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
    • Member Portal >
      • Directory
      • Forms
      • Graphics
      • Minutes

The Roundtable

Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.

Photo courtesy of Flickr user Boston Public Library. 

INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Are Western “Modernizing” Laws Better for Jordanian Rape Victims than Islamic Shari’ah?

4/21/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Muskan Mumtaz

Muskan Mumtaz is a sophomore at University of Virginia.

As Muslim societies began demanding social and political changes in the wake of the Arab Spring, the issue of “rape-marriage” laws in the Middle East reopened for debate. In Jordan, this law allows rapists to avoid legal prosecution if they agree to marry their victim and thus “save” the lost honor of the girl and her family. Essentially products of the Ottoman and French penal codes, these laws have been criticized for undermining Islamic shari’ah, which does not recognize retroactive reduction of criminal punishments. 

More importantly, these rape-marriage laws are perceived as attempts to resolve social problems—in this case, removing the stigma around the dishonored family—instead of effectively punishing a criminal. Since Egypt repealed its version of the rape-marriage law in 2002, activists in Jordan have been pressuring the government to create a new rape law that better aligns with Islamic beliefs, as well as modern notions of human rights and justice.

Identifying the origins of the rape-marriage law in Jordan will help explain the reasoning behind it. Currently, the Jordanian penal code has two articles that pertain to rape-marriage: first is Article 292, which lays out the punishment for rape: “Whoever has sexual intercourse with a woman, other than his wife, without her consent—whether through coercion, threat, deception, or fraud—is punished with hard labor for no less than 15 years.”[1]

Second, Article 308 specifically outlines the “marriage” aspect of the rape-marriage law: “If a valid contract of marriage is made between the perpetrator of any of the offenses mentioned in this section, and the victim, the prosecution is suspended. If judgment was already passed, the implementation of the punishment upon the sentenced person is suspended.”[2] Articles 292 and 308 originate from the Imperial Ottoman Penal Code, which is believed to be the first to include a marriage-rape provision as an effort to “modernize” the empire.

In hindsight, it is difficult to comprehend how such a provision could be considered “modernizing.” It is important to realize that throughout the 20th century, honor killings of rape victims had been a common method of “restoring” the honor of the victim’s family. Because a victim’s marriage prospects were thought to decrease after she was raped, her family considered her to be both a social and financial burden, as well as a stain on their honor.

Even today, cultural support for honor killings remains widespread—a 2013 study by Cambridge University found that one in five girls and one in two boys supported honor killings to restore family honor. More surprisingly, they found that “substantial minorities of girls, well-educated and even irreligious teenagers consider honor killing morally right, [thus] suggesting a persisting society-wide support for the tradition.”[3]

Essentially, the rape-marriage law seeks to eradicate the need to commit honor killings by forcing the transgressor to marry his victim. This would save the victim’s life, restore her family's honor, and in the eyes of these jurists, serve as adequate punishment for the perpetrator. It may seem shocking to think that 55.8% of Jordanians perceive Article 308 as a “win-win” situation, but outlining the argument of the supporters reveals deeper societal flaws within Jordan.[4]

Israa Tawalbeh, Jordan’s first female coroner, argues that “the law fits our society and reality...accepting marriage under Article 308 is better than leaving girls to be killed by their parents or relatives. It protects the girls by forcing attackers to marry them.”[5] This raises the question of whether or not there are other methods of bringing justice to the rapist while protecting the life of the victim in a society that places the burden of honor on women.

Egypt would argue that there is. In 1999, Egyptian Mufi Nasr Farid Wasel issued a fatwa declaring that the rape-marriage law was against the principles of Islamic shari’ah. Wasel stated that "rape is psychological murder for a woman" and that forcing a victim to marry is contrary to the principles of Islamic marriage, which should be built on a foundation of love and compassion.[6] This argument is echoed by modern Jordanian activists who maintain that this law was not created as a punishment, but rather as a solution for the social stigma surrounding the victim and her family.

Moreover, most Islamic legal schools do not recognize the retroactive reduction of criminal punishments. Excluding the Hanafi School of Law, classical Islamic jurists approached rape in a very different way: they categorized it under Hirabah, which in this case would be a violent crime relying on sexual intercourse as the weapon, or as Jirah, which requires compensation for harm to the sexual organs.

Traditional Islamic jurisprudence, for the most part, did not include rape-marriage clauses, and many modern legal scholars believe that these laws exist in the Middle East today because the Ottomans imported them from the French Penal Code. In other words, certain jurists believe that Western laws have, in this instance, regressed the status of women from the customary stance they were given under Islamic shari’ah.

In Egypt, more than 90% of couples formed under the rape-marriage law sought divorce within months of the marriage.[7] Clearly, there is a judicial vacuum that neither shari’ah nor “modernizing” penal code has been able to fill. This vacuum exists within the “the marriage loophole [that] is clearly a means by which to rectify a social problem (the social standing of a raped woman and her family) rather than to punish a crime.”[8]

The rapid growth of civil society in Jordan and throughout the Middle East as a result of the Arab Spring brings some hope to the situation of Jordanian rape victims. Legal and social activists are forming grassroots advocacy campaigns against Article 308, and as globalism ensues and education levels rise, it is likely that pressure on the government will push Jordan to follow Egypt’s lead in keeping with the spirit of the Quran by repealing their rape-marriage law.

The Arab Spring has created a unique space for modern activists and jurists to restructure laws in previously unforeseeable ways. Hopefully, the women of Jordan will be able to benefit from changes, regardless of whether they stem from secularism or Islamic jurisprudence.


[1] http://selfscholar.wordpress.com/2012/07/18/the-middle-easts-rape-marriage-laws/
[2]  http://selfscholar.wordpress.com/2012/07/18/the-middle-easts-rape-marriage-laws/
[3] http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/06/201362054127558357.html
[4] http://jordantimes.com/lawyers-journalists-and-scholars-call-for-scrapping-article-308
[5] http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/06/28/223266.html
[6] http://www.arabwestreport.info/year-1999/week-17/33-legal-loophole-rapists-closed
[7] http://www.arabwestreport.info/year-1999/week-17/33-legal-loophole-rapists-closed
[8]  http://selfscholar.wordpress.com/2012/07/18/the-middle-easts-rape-marriage-laws/

Photo Credit: Flickr User Muhammad Ghouri 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    ACA
    Alana Mattei
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Anna Schwartz
    Artificial Intelligence
    Ashley Kim
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Biotechnology
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Civil Rights
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Congress
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    Data
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Environment
    EPA
    Flint
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Gun Control
    Habib Olapade
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Inequality
    Interviews
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Justin Yang
    Katie Kaufman
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Matthew Caulfield
    Media
    Megan Yan
    Michael Keshmiri
    Minimum Age
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicole Greenstein
    Obamacare
    Omar Khoury
    Opioid Crisis
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pennsylvania
    Pennsylvania Law
    Pharmaceuticals
    Philadelphia Law
    Presidential Powers
    Public Education
    Public Heatlh
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Renewable Energy
    Sam Nadler
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Second Amendment
    Shannon Alvino
    Siddarth Sethi
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Sue And Settle
    Supreme Court
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Technology
    Telecommunications
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Transgender Rights
    Trump
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Unfiled
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Proudly powered by Weebly
✕