Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
  • Submissions
  • The Roundtable
  • Full Issues
  • Sponsors
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
    • Member Portal >
      • Directory
      • Forms
      • Graphics
      • Minutes
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
  • Submissions
  • The Roundtable
  • Full Issues
  • Sponsors
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
    • Member Portal >
      • Directory
      • Forms
      • Graphics
      • Minutes

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

An Infringed Image

3/6/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Tanner Bowen

Tanner Bowen is a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania.

Bob Marley has become one of the most influential figures in modern pop culture, as well as a notoriously cited musical influence ever since his death over three decades ago. However, since his death, numerous attempts to falsely endorse his famous image upon t-shirts and other merchandise found at large retailers such as K-Mart, Wal-Mart, and J.C. Penney have arisen. Hope Road, an entity made up of Marley’s descendants, once again took up this battle in an attempt to stop the dispersal of Marley’s image and recuperate lost revenue from such actions.

In Fifty-Six Hope Road Music v. A.V.E.L.A., Hope Road sued A.V.E.L.A., Inc., X One X Movie Archive, Inc., and other defendants for acquiring photographs of Bob Marley in 2004. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that A.V.E.L.A. and other defendants were guilty of knowingly using Bob Marley’s image on their merchandise as well as falsely endorsing it to other customers in Nevada. In addition, Hope Road was entitled to the net profits generated by all of the defendant entities from the merchandise sold which had Marley’s image illegally placed upon it and finally reimbursement for attorney fees.

To start, under the Lanham Act, Hope Road has a property right to Marley’s persona. This legislation was used as one of the primary factors in the Ninth Circuit’s opinion, which considered whether the actions of A.V.E.L.A. and the other enterprises could have caused confusion regarding the “origin, sponsorship, or approval” of the items bearing Marley’s image [1]. Upon further discoveries by the Court, it was found that A.V.E.L.A. intentionally created shirts or other merchandise that looked very similar to the merchandise sold by Zion Rootswear, LLC, who has an agreement with Hope Road to sell merchandise with Marley’s image.

Beyond that fact, the vice president of licensing for one of the other defendants, Freeze, Inc., had received a phone call from the licensing agent of Hope Road before the company started manufacturing the merchandise with Marley’s image in which Hope Road told Freeze that Hope Road owned the rights to Bob Marley. The vice president of licensing for Freeze also had knowledge that Zion had a license to sell Marley’s merchandise that predated Freeze’s first sales. This showed the awareness of the defendants and their choice to deliberately ignore requests from Hope Road.

The Ninth Circuit also considered these purposeful actions in determining whether A.V.E.L.A. and the other defendants interfered in Hope Road’s potential sales. The fact that the defendants brushed off these warnings from Hope Road, coupled with the fact that A.V.E.L.A. actually lost a shipment to retailer Wal-Mart, whose potential sales could have been about $250,000, was enough for the Ninth Circuit to uphold the interference claim and to also announce an “exceptional case” in awarding the defendants to pay attorney fees.  

All in all, this case presents a routine false endorsement claim against a corporate entity that willingly sold merchandise that they did not have a license to sell.  However, a bigger issue here is the development of the field of law around a person’s image. Although one may think that any image is naturally protected under false endorsement claims, it often largely depends upon the relation of the entity making the claim to the person’s image. Since Hope Road is composed of Bob Marley’s direct descendants, their connection to his image is strong. However, other cases involving Princess Diana have shown that if there is a weak association between the plaintiff and the person’s image or if the image has been used so many times by different entities that there is no longer an established connection between the plaintiff and the celebrity’s image, then the image may not be protected [2].  

Many factors affect public association with an image, and often times it falls to the courts to decide if the false endorsement of an image would be enough to cause confusion on the part of consumers.

[1]   Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
[2]  Cairns II, 107 F. Supp. 2d at 1217.



Photo Credit:  "Nine-Mile-Jamaica" by Jasonbook99 - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nine-Mile-Jamaica.JPG#mediaviewer/File:Nine-Mile-Jamaica.JPG



0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    ACA
    ACLU
    Alana Mattei
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Anna Schwartz
    Arrest
    Artificial Intelligence
    Ashley Kim
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Biotechnology
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Civil Rights
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Congress
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    Data
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Due Process
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Environment
    EPA
    FCC
    FISA
    Flint
    Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
    Frank Geng
    Freedom Of Speech
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Gun Control
    Habib Olapade
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Implied Powers
    Inequality
    Internet Privacy
    Interviews
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Jury Nullification
    Justin Yang
    Katie Kaufman
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Matthew Caulfield
    Media
    Michael Keshmiri
    Minimum Age
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicole Greenstein
    Obamacare
    Omar Khoury
    Opioid Crisis
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pennsylvania
    Pennsylvania Law
    Pharmaceuticals
    Pheby Liu
    Philadelphia Law
    Police
    Presidential Powers
    Public Education
    Public Heatlh
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Renewable Energy
    Sam Nadler
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Second Amendment
    Shannon Alvino
    Siddarth Sethi
    Social Media
    State Law
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Sue And Settle
    Supreme Court
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Technology
    Telecommunications
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Transgender Rights
    Trump
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Unfiled
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​