Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Agency and Power: The EPA and Obama’s Federalism

10/16/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Sanjay Dureseti

Sanjay Dureseti is a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania and an associate editor of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal.
​
Martin Winterkorn, the now-former CEO of German automobile giant Volkswagen AG, recently admitted to his company’s use of secret software to fool diesel emissions tests. When the United States’ Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) caught wind of VW’s duplicity, they launched an investigation that revealed further disturbing truths. Estimates state that 11 million road-bound cars, ranging from cheaper models to luxury vehicles, are programmed with Volkswagen’s “defeat device.” [1]                     

Such emissions standards have been the cornerstone of the EPA’s regulatory approach since its inception. Concerns for the effects of vehicular pollution first arose in 1960s and 1970s, when the postwar boom led to an explosion in automobile manufacturing, causing rampant atmospheric contamination. [2] President Richard Nixon, in an attempt to harness the electoral potency of the environmental issue, decided to form an umbrella organization designed to engage in all realms of environmental protection. [3]
However, Nixon could not have foreseen the controversy in the future of his invention. The EPA’s creation set off a larger debate, immediately polarizing lawmakers. The dispute over the agency’s role and its very existence has now transformed into a microcosm of one of the country’s greatest and oldest issues: the power and reach of the federal government. [4]

Recent legal events further paint the picture of the EPA as a symbol of Federal overreach. In 2014, President Obama, through an executive action, implemented one of the most ambitious and stringent environmental protection plans in American history. Citing an obscure portion of the 1970 Clean Air Act, Obama aimed to tackle carbon pollution in over 600 coal-fired power plants. This tremendous increase in the oversight of the EPA immediately brought on the wrath of the coal industry and its Congressional allies, and the Obama Administration quickly became tangled up in lawsuits that reflected the ages-old rhetoric of a government overstepping its bounds.

The coal industry was not without its allies in academia, who stated that the law violated the Constitution’s Due Process Clause, as well as the 10th Amendment. Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe delivered a harsh rebuke of the EPA’s plans. He claimed that the regulations were unconstitutional, as the new rules would punish private enterprise years after it had already committed to federal investments. These retroactive sanctions, opined Tribe, were violations of the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment. [6] Tribe also cited the EPA’s carbon cuts as infringements on the “Takings Clause,” which prohibits private entities from bearing the brunt of a public burden. [7] In addition, he claimed that the Federal government forced the States to adopt this national policy of regulation, violating the Constitutional separation of Federal and State government.

Two of Tribe’s Harvard colleagues were quick to refute Tribe’s arguments of the unconstitutionality of Obama’s legislation. Professors Richard Lazarus and Jody Freeman argued that Obama’s Clean Power Plan simply did not grant the EPA coercive power over the States. [8] That is, the Agency could not punish states for failing to submit regulatory plans, which was the Federal overstep vehemently opposed by Tribe and his allies. Lazarus and Freeman went on to state that Tribe’s portrayal of the Agency’s complete subversion of States’ rights was “just not true.” [9] States were granted the ability to tailor regulatory plans to their needs.
The Supreme Court, however, agreed with Tribe. In the case of Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. EPA, the Court ruled with the plaintiff, which was a collection of corporations, non-for-profits, and 23 states. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that the Agency misinterpreted the Clean Air Act and failed to consider the overly harsh economic impact of its regulations. [10] Opponents of the EPA rejoiced, declaring victory over “bureaucratic overreach” and proclaiming their attempts to “institute some common sense in rule making” as brilliantly successful.

Volkswagen’s deceit brings the role of the EPA back to the foreground of political and legal debate. The Agency is forced to consider levying massive penalties on the automaker, as initial estimates suggest that VW could be charged with up to $18 billion dollars in fines. [11] Such a blow would be catastrophic for Volkswagen and, quite possibly, the world as a whole. Already, markets are exhibiting volatility and there are worries that the crisis is dragging Germany, the heart of the Eurozone, towards the brink. [12]

The EPA is faced with a crucial regulatory decision. Showing leniency would allow a company guilty of systemic corruption and fraud to go unpunished. Excessive punishment, however, would not only result in potentially catastrophic economic consequences, but also contribute to an already-dire state of political polarization.

For now, the Agency’s leanings are unclear. One thing, however, is certain; the world, and its political, legal, and economic institutions, are watching.


[1] Glinton, Sonari. “Volkswagen Says 11 Million Cars Worldwide Have Emissions Cheating Software” National Public Radio. September 22, 2015. http://www.npr.org/2015/09/22/442582415/volkswagen-says-11-million-cars-worldwide-have-emissions-cheating-software. Accessed September 24, 2015.
[2] “Origins of the EPA”. The Guardian. Spring 1992. Found in EPA Historical Publication Vol. 1. http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/guardian-origins-epa. Accessed September 24, 2015.
[3] Lewis, Jack. “Looking Backward: A Historical Perspective on Environmental Regulations” EPA Journal. Spring 1988. http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/looking-backward-historical-perspective-environmental-regulations. Accessed September 24, 2015
[4] Lewis, Jack. “Looking Backward: A Historical Perspective on Environmental Regulations.” EPA Journal. Spring 1988. http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/looking-backward-historical-perspective-environmental-regulations. Accessed September 24, 2015
[5] Davenport, Coral. “Obama to Take Action to Slash Coal Pollution.” The New York Times. June 1, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/02/us/politics/epa-to-seek-30-percent-cut-in-carbon-emissions.html. Accessed September 25, 2015.
[6] Tribe, Laurence. “Comments of Laurence H. Tribe and Peabody Energy Corporation.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. December 1, 2014. http://www.masseygail.com/pdf/Tribe-Peabody_111%28d%29_Comments_%28filed%29.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2015.
[7] Tribe, Laurence. “Comments of Laurence H. Tribe and Peabody Energy Corporation.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. December 1, 2014. http://www.masseygail.com/pdf/Tribe-Peabody_111%28d%29_Comments_%28filed%29.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2015.
[8] Freeman, Jody and Lazarus, Marl. “Freeman and Lazarus: A rebuttal to Tribe’s reply” Harvard Law Today. March 21, 2015. http://today.law.harvard.edu/a_rebuttal_to_tribe_reply/. Accessed September 25, 2015
[9] Freeman, Jody and Lazarus, Marl. “Freeman and Lazarus: A rebuttal to Tribe’s reply” Harvard Law Today. March 21, 2015. http://today.law.harvard.edu/a_rebuttal_to_tribe_reply/. Accessed September 25, 2015.
[10] Scalia, Antonin. “14-46 Michigan v. EPA.” United States Supreme Court. June 29, 2015. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-46_bqmc.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2015.
[11] Holding, Reynolds. “Volkswagen Faces Harsher Penalties Than a U.S. Company Might.” DealBook-The New York Times. September 28, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/29/business/dealbook/volkswagen-faces-harsher-penalties-than-a-us-company-might.html. Accessed September 29, 2015.
[12] Nienaber, Michael. “Volkswagen could pose bigger threat to German economy than Greek crisis.” Reuters. September 23, 2015. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/23/us-usa-volkswagen-germany-economy-idUSKCN0RN27S20150923. Accessed September 29, 2015.
 
Photo Credit: Flickr User Hamish Irvine


The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​