Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

A Continued Conservative Majority on the Supreme Court?

12/28/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Gabriel Maliha

Gabriel Maliha is a senior at the University of Pennsylvania studying criminology.

As soon as November 8th ushered in a new president-elect, speculations began as to who Donald Trump would appoint to the current vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016. The judicial position remains unfilled because the United States Senate had not acted on President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland [1]. As a candidate, Trump had taken the unusual step of publicizing a list of about twenty individuals including judges that he felt might be suitable for the position. Unsurprisingly, they all appear to be ideologically conservative.
​

Filling the current vacancy with a conservative justice would maintain the right-leaning majority on the court that has existed since 1971. However, the opportunity to appoint two, or even three, more justices over the next four to eight years of a Trump administration could be a true game changer. Due to age, many Justices may be reaching the end of their tenure on the Court, as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83, Justice Anthony Kennedy is 80 and Justice Stephen Breyer is 78. The first two are reliably liberal and Mr. Kennedy is the swing vote, so their replacement could substantially hurt liberals.
The eight member court that has existed since February, split ideologically down the middle, has skirted many issues by returning them to lower courts for further adjudication as it did with the case surrounding the Clean Power Plan and Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) program [2] [3]. In other cases, such as that of the California teachers union requiring mandatory fees from non-union members, an equally divided court affirmed lower court ruling in non-precedential decisions [4] [5]. This is in addition to important rulings by lower courts that are all but certain to make their way to the high court. This includes the recent decision by the circuit court for the District of Columbia to consider the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an agency of the executive branch with its director serving at the pleasure and the direction of the President [6].

Some issues such as DAPA may become moot for the court if the new president reverses the executive order establishing the program as he is widely expected to do judging by his campaign pledges. Regulations such as the Clean Power Plan may be rendered moot, or their chances of being upheld greatly weakened if the new administration notifies the court that it plans further revisions. In the case of Clean Power Plan, the Supreme Court has already ordered the EPA to halt enforcement in an unprecedented decision in February 2016. Other options concerning regulations that have not gone into effect would be to delay the date they take effect while the lengthy revision process unfolds [7]. For lower court rulings that suit the new administration, such as abolishing the independent agency status of the CFPB, the upcoming administration will simply forgo further appeals.

The temptation to enact policy by executive order and aggressive rulemaking is understandable, though not generally the best way to proceed in the long term. Presidents in both parties have used those levers of power to carry out their favored policies. This is particularly true when the opposition party controls Congress. Executive orders are in principle a framework set by the president for the benefit of the federal bureaucracy to carry out specific directives within the inherent Constitutional executive powers of the president. Regulations are promulgated by agencies of government to execute statutes as written by Congress and consistent with its legislative intent [7].

Executive orders are the least transparent and fastest way to promulgate policy, as they are not subject to the usual statutory public feedback from stakeholders. Regulations do require a public commentary period, and they generally take significantly longer to finalize. However, both are inherently unilateral processes of the executive branch. In the case of regulations, the Congressional Review Act provides a check, though a very difficult one to exercise because it is subject to the veto power of the president. Of course, both executive orders and regulations are subject to court review [8].

But beyond the legal aspects, both executive orders and aggressive regulating are the least stable ways of promulgating policy. Executive orders may be reversed unilaterally by a subsequent president, while regulations may be revised by agencies under presidential direction. Legislation is the most predictable and transparent way to enact policy. Hearings allow stakeholders to express their views and inform legislators, congressional debates build a record of legislative intent, the text of the statute may determine the parameters that are subject to court review, and the executive branch has a chance to shape the legislation that the president is willing to sign.

[1] Savage, David. “Trump’s victory ensures a conservative majority on the supreme court.” LA Times 9 November 2016.
[2] “A new national clean power plan.” Environmental Defense Fund.. Retrieved from http://www.edf.org/climate/a-new-federal-clean-power-plan.
[3] Malloy, Allie. “Obama unveils major climate change proposal.” CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/02/politics/obama-climate-change-plan/
[4] Bravin, Jess. “Republican victories likely to alter supreme court’s docket.” The Wall Street Journal 11 November 2016.
[5] Savage, David. “Trump’s victory ensures a conservative majority on the supreme court.” LA Times 9 November 2016.
[6] PHH Corporation, Et AL. v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
[7] Shapiro, Stuart, “What new presidents can (and cannot) do about regulation.” The Hill 23 December 2015.
[8] Shapiro, Stuart. “The congressional review act rarely and (almost always) unsuccessful.” The Hill 17 April 2015.

Photo Credit: Flickr User Mark Fischer


The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​