Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

The Golden Rule: International Comity

2/20/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Tanner Bowen

Tanner Bowen is a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania.

In November, the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed the trend in American international policy to respect the rulings of foreign courts in matters that originated in foreign countries.  Although this policy of deference has not always been at the forefront of American politics, this was definitely the case in a recent court decision involving two American companies and an air raid in Colombia. 

In 1998, the companies Occidental Petroleum Corp. and AirScan, Inc. had taken up base in Colombia.  With Colombia’s richness in natural resources, the Colombian government had hired Occidental to build a petroleum pipeline.  This building project, however, was often interrupted and attacked by left-wing insurgents, requiring AirScan to provide security for Occidental’s pipeline. On December 13, 1998, AirScan helped supply the Colombian Air Force with the finances necessary to engage in an air strike against the radical insurgents.  This strike ultimately killed seventeen and injured twenty-five individuals.
But after several successful cases in the Colombian court system, the plaintiffs decided to take the case to the United States and sue the two American companies for a violation of the Torture Victims Protection Act  as well as the Alien Tort Statute. [1] The case Mujica v. AirScan was filed in California and appealed to the Ninth Circuit, where it was asked whether the plaintiffs in this case had a claim under federal and state-law claims.  To this, the answer was no. 

To start, the Ninth Circuit swiftly struck down the federal law claims under the TVPA and the ATS by stating that Occidental and AirScan were corporations, not individuals.  Thus, they could not bring claims under the Torture Victims Protection Act.  Additionally, the Alien Tort Statute claim was struck down through the extraterritorial application.  In this case, since none of the actions took place within the borders of the United States and only in Colombia, this argument could not be validated.

Going beyond this, we now get into the bulk of the opinion, which discussed whether adjudicatory comity was applicable in such a situation, where a “true conflict” between domestic and foreign law was not present.  To this, the Ninth Circuit looked towards the Supreme Court’s last case involving international comity.  In the case Hartford Fire Ins. Co.v. Cal., the Court ruled that there was not a true conflict that needed to be present in order to determine discretionary deference. [2]  So, unlike the district court ruling of Mujica in which the Plaintiffs’ claim was automatically dismissed because the judge found no “true conflict” to exist, the Ninth Circuit adopted the policy of including whether a conflict exists in the case analysis instead of using that as the automatic determiner. 


Following this logic, in this case the Court next considered the US interest, the Colombian interest, as well as the adequacy of Colombian judicial forum.
  For the United States, the State Department actually attached a Statement of Interest to this case as well as the submission of an
amicus curiae brief, which stated that the Government would prefer to have the case dismissed so as to not jeopardize one of America’s strongest Latin American and oil-producing allies. 

As for the Colombian interest and forum, the Ninth Circuit easily concluded that since the event occurred on foreign soil, the country would naturally have a greater interest in the case than that of the United States.  In addition, the respect for Colombian jurisdiction and the hope to avoid duplicate litigation (the Plaintiffs have tried for years to bring the case against AirScan in Colombian courts) prove strong motivators for the application of international comity.  Finally, the fact that the Plaintiffs have been incredibly successful in Colombian courts in suing their government, then the forum for an appropriate remedy to take place is already sufficient in this Latin American country. 

With all of this consideration, the Ninth Circuit readily dismissed the federal and state-law claims of the plaintiffs. 

Although the concept of reciprocity is still intact in American policy, the case still presents other puzzling questions.  For example, the strong interest in the United States government leads one to wonder if the true intentions are simply to promote respect of foreign powers or if there is a deeper underlying issue.  This case also highlights the issue of supremacy in the fact that the United States felt a different way about the case than the State of California, which had an interest in providing a forum for those harmed by the actions of corporate citizens. But in this case, the Court couldn’t deny the power of the federal government over state government interests. 

So, the Golden Rule of International Comity has maintained its status quo: do unto others as you would have done unto you.  We will now have to see how long this policy lasts or can be stretched until the United States decides to intervene like it has for the last century in Latin America.

 

[1] 28 U.S. Code § 1350
[2] Hartford Fire Ins. Co.v. Cal., 509 U.S. 764 (1993). Photo Credit: Flickr User Thomas Hawk

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​