Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


The Legal Implications of ChatGPT: Issues of Intellectual Property

3/24/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Gabrielle Cohen

Gaby Cohen is a second-year student at the University of Pennsylvania’s College of Arts and Sciences studying philosophy, politics and economics.
​

ChatGPT has generated intellectual property and copyright controversies and ignited debate among students, teachers, writers, artists, content creators, and employees of every kind. Released in November 2022, ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot powered by a large language model, which prompts it to perceive human language, evaluate and sort through immense collections of data, and produce replies [1]. The chatbot was developed by OpenAI, a startup based in San Francisco funded by prominent investors such as Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Microsoft. ChatGPT consists of generative AI, using algorithms to generate, summarize, and alter data [2]. Human users type written prompts into the engine, and the software produces a response in a conversational manner that attempts to replicate a human reply [3]. To generate its response, the Generative Pretrained Transformer takes data from the internet.
The chatbot is a godsend for some but a threat to others: Could it fool teachers? Replace jobs? Perhaps one of the most significant concerns among lawyers and creators: Could it spawn legal disputes? In a nation where now over 646,000 patents are filed annually, it is important to decipher the legal implications of text produced with ChatGPT in terms of intellectual property and potential copyright breaches. [4]

As a large language model, ChatGPT sorts through heaps of existing data from the internet [5]. Contrary to its appearance, the program is not capable of creating new information. Instead, ChatGPT uses a process to generate responses that involves analyzing and summarizing pre-existing data. From an intellectual property perspective, many legal scholars hold that this means the chatbot can contribute to projects but cannot be credited as an author or an entity that has created new content.

However, a full consensus does not exist. Other legal experts argue that ChatGPT can improve or manipulate the existing data that it sorts through and produce its own original material, similar to a student writing a research paper. They claim that this ability to make its own contributions to the existing content qualifies as authorship or inventorship. Margaret Esquenet, a partner at Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, outlines that content ownership may depend on the AI training data set that gives the AI tool its information, the owner of the training data set, and the similarity between the data set and the work the AI produces [6]. If the chatbot is capable of the creation of intellectual property that can be patented or trademarked (or if at least one can argue this), and if it can be regarded as an author in textual works (or if at least one could argue this), the issue of ChatGPT’s ability to be charged with breach of copyright remains.

In terms of potential IP violations, the argument that ChatGPT cannot breach copyright because it is not a legal entity begs the question: If the produced response does breach copyright, who then is responsible? When employees use ChatGPT to generate texts to be distributed to a larger audience, there is a legal risk of indirectly using another person’s or entity’s patented or copyrighted intellectual property [7]. Some have asserted that when these breaches occur, the person or entity using the language model would be legally at fault for creating the infringing content [8]. However, the situation becomes more nuanced when we consider the vast number of people who argue that ChatGPT may legitimately be credited with authorship in its content creation process. Even here at the University of Pennsylvania, some professors have instructed their students to cite ChatGPT as a source if used in their written assignments [9]. These judgments certainly foster some contradictions, expected for such a rapidly developing field.

According to Esquenet, US law requires that copyright protection be granted only under the conditions that the work is original and was produced by a human being [10]. In 2011, a monkey in an Indonesian jungle got hold of a photographer’s camera and took a “monkey selfie” [11]. When the photographer used the photo in his book, People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) promptly filed a copyright suit in 2015, stating that the use of the photo violated the monkey’s rights under US copyright law [12]. A judge ruled that copyright law does not apply to animals. Therefore, one may deduce that copyright infringement does not either. There are no official precedents for copyright infringement by a non-human entity. However, according to Michael Kebler, co-chair of Neal Gerber Einsenberg’s IP practice, the court system has been hostile to the notion of non-humans claiming authorship or inventorship, and in both cases, thereby ownership of the IP” [13].

Many comparisons to other digital works can be made when determining who or what is responsible for the content that ChatGPT creates. Kebler points to examples of graphic artists owning the artwork that they make using drawing software [14]. If ChatGPT were equivalent to these types of software, the human would be responsible for creating the work, and the chatbot would simply be the tool used to follow his or her directions and carry out his or her vision. However, Kebler also notes that ChatGPT significantly limits a human’s ability to regulate the output of the chatbot. All things considered, Kebler asserts that protests of IP violations are not likely to succeed in court because these claims require veritable proof of one party copying another’s work, which does not occur with AI generation.

The question of ChatGPT intellectual property ownership and liability remains obscure. ChatGPT will certainly not be going away any time soon, and with software improvements fast-approaching, settling potential issues of ownership and copyright breaches will only become more crucial.

References
[1] Browne, Ryan. “All You Need to Know about Chatgpt, the A.I. Chatbot That's Got the World Talking and Tech Giants Clashing.” CNBC. CNBC, February 8, 2023. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/08/what-is-chatgpt-viral-ai-chatbot-at-heart-of-microsoft-google-fight.html. 
[2] Fruhlinger, Josh. “What Is Generative Ai? the Evolution of Artificial Intelligence.” InfoWorld. InfoWorld, March 10, 2023. https://www.infoworld.com/article/3689973/what-is-generative-ai-the-evolution-of-artificial-intelligence.html#:~:text=Generative%20AI%20is%20an%20umbrella,that%20didn't%20previously%20exist. 
[3] Browne, ““All You Need to Know about Chatgpt, the A.I. Chatbot That's Got the World Talking and Tech Giants Clashing.”
[4] “U.S. Patent Statistics Chart Calendar Years 1963 - 2020.” U.S. Patent Statistics Summary Table, Calendar Years 1963 to 2020, 05/2021 update. Accessed March 14, 2023. https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/us_stat.htm. 
[5] “Chatgpt: From the Horse's Mouth.” Monash Lens, February 13, 2023. https://lens.monash.edu/@politics-society/2023/02/13/1385448/chatgpt-old-ai-problems-in-a-new-guise-new-problems-in-disguise#:~:text=The%20first%20legal%20concern%20related,training%20data%20may%20be%20copyrighted. 
[6] McKendrick, Joe. “Who Ultimately Owns Content Generated by CHATGPT and Other AI Platforms?” Forbes. Forbes Magazine, February 22, 2023. https://www.forbes.com/sites/joemckendrick/2022/12/21/who-ultimately-owns-content-generated-by-chatgpt-and-other-ai-platforms/?sh=308a9e985423. 
[7] Grossenbacher, Karla. “Employers Should Consider These Risks When Employees Use Chatgpt.” Bloomberg Law, February 16,2023.https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/employers-should-consider-these-risks-when-employees-use-chatgpt. 
[8] “Chatgpt: From the Horse's Mouth.”
[9] Meredith, Marc. “Writing Assignment #1.” Public Policy Process, PPE 3002-401. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. February 28, 2023.
[10] McKendrick, “Who Ultimately Owns Content Generated by CHATGPT and Other AI Platforms?”
[11] Slotkin, Jason. “'Monkey Selfie' Lawsuit Ends with Settlement between Peta, Photographer.” NPR. NPR, September 12, 2017.https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/09/12/550417823/-animal-rights-advocates-photographer-compromise-over-ownership-of-monkey-selfie. 
[12] “Copyright for Animal Selfies - Monkey Business?” Nelligan Law, September 20, 2021. https://nelliganlaw.ca/blog/copyright-for-animal-selfies-monkey-business/#:~:text=In%202014%2C%20the%20United%20States,photograph%20taken%20by%20a%20monkey.%E2%80%9D.[13] McKendrick, “Who Ultimately Owns Content Generated by CHATGPT and Other AI Platforms?”
[14] Ibid.

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Aaron Tsui
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alexandra Kerrigan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Amanda Damayanti
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Arshiya Pant
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Catherine Tang
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Jewell
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Hannah Steinberg
    Harshit Rai
    Hennessis Umacta
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Ingrid Holmquist
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Khlood Awan
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyan Casamalhuapa
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Michael Merolla
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nathan Liu
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nicole Patel
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Paula Vekker
    Pheby Liu
    Pragat Patel
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Samantha Graines
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Tyler Ringhofer
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.