Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


The Filibuster: Partisan Weapon or Protector of the Minority?

10/20/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Photo Credit: The Atlantic

By Isabela Baghdady
​
​
Isabela Baghdady is a freshman in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania with plans to study Philosophy, Politics, and Economics.
With Election Day weeks away Senate Republicans are in danger of losing the majority, prompting questions about the future of the Senate filibuster—a long-honored institutional practice that allows a single Senator to extend debate until 60 members agree to move to a vote [1].
In recent decades, the once-obscure measure has become almost common practice, with most bills now requiring a Senate supermajority of 60 votes in order to become law. Yet, as the filibuster becomes increasingly entrenched in Senate procedure, politicians and citizens alike are questioning both its purpose and its implications for American democracy: is the filibuster truly a safeguard for the minority or is it a threat to advancing legislation?

The History of the Filibuster
The filibuster originated in 1806, when the Senate eliminated the antiquated “previous question motion,” a provision from Senate Rules that permitted a simple majority of 51 votes to end debate on a bill [2]. This action allowed the minority party to extend debate and block legislation—giving way to the first filibuster in 1837. Almost a century and a half later in 1975, the number of votes required to end debate—called invoking cloture—was set at 60, three-fifths of the entire Senate population [3]. At its core, the filibuster functioned to prevent the tyranny of the majority by making bipartisanship a requirement for passing legislation [4].

Since then, however, the filibuster has transformed dramatically, granting the minority a profound influence over the Senate’s agenda. Today, more and more Senate bills require 60 votes in order to end debate, thus stymieing the majority party’s policy initiatives and slowing down presidential agendas [2]. The filibuster has been used by the minority to successfully block legislation on topics ranging from gun control, to reproductive rights, to the Southern border wall [5].

During the Obama presidency in 2013, Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid established a new precedent with regard to the filibuster. Using a parliamentary action called the “nuclear option,” Reid eliminated the filibuster with respect to presidential lower-court judicial nominations [5]. Then, in 2017, Senate Majority Mitch McConnell followed suit, extending the nuclear option to remove the 60 vote requirement for Supreme Court judges. Overall, the new precedent has allowed the confirmation of 216 federal judicial nominations under President Trump [5].

Should the Filibuster Be Eliminated?
Whether or not the filibuster should be eliminated from Senate procedure remains a controversy among both political parties. While some perceive the filibuster as a threat to passing progressive legislation, others—especially in light of the effects of the nuclear option—regard the practice as a check on the power of the majority.

Leading up to the 2020 election, the filibuster has become a prevalent topic as the chances of a Democratic Senate become increasingly possible. Prominent Democratic politicians, such as Senator Elizabeth Warren, have voiced support for eliminating the filibuster. "When Democrats have the White House again, if Mitch McConnell continues to put small-minded partisanship ahead of solving the massive problems facing our country, then we should get rid of the filibuster,” stated Warren in 2019 [6]. Even if Democrats take back the White House and Democrats gain a majority in the Senate, a unified Democratic government’s efforts towards immigration, climate change, racial equity, and electoral reform would be futile if blocked by a Republican minority [7].

Former President Barack Obama also emphasized support for eliminating the filibuster during his eulogy for civil rights leader John Lewis last July. Obama referred to the filibuster as a “Jim Crow relic” that has prevented the passage of major civil rights legislation [8]. On the other hand, politicians such as presidential nominee Joe Biden have previously voiced concerns over eliminating the filibuster. “It is the ultimate act of unfairness to alter the unique responsibility of the Senate…at its core, the filibuster is not about stopping a nominee or a bill, it is about compromise and moderation,” stated Biden back in 2005 [5].

Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell also seemingly warned Democrats that eliminating the filibuster would simply result in a one-party system that is only expedient when in the majority party: “The important thing for our Democratic friends to remember is that you may not be in total control in the future” [8].

Ultimately, however, a Hill-HarrisX poll conducted last August shows that only 15% of Democratic voters and 12% of Republican voters support complete elimination of the filibuster. As a whole, registered voters largely agree that the filibuster should remain as is, although 31% stated they believe in increased limits on exercising the filibuster [9].

Furthermore, in order to eliminate the filibuster, Democrats would need to formally change the language of Senate Rule 22, the measure requiring 60 votes for cloture. However, ending debate on a resolution to alter Senate rules demands the support of two-thirds of the senators present and voting. Thus, even if Democrats win the Senate there is a slim chance they will achieve the 67 votes necessary to eradicate the filibuster [4].

The Promise of Reform
Complete elimination of the filibuster by Democrats would leave progressive policies vulnerable to repeal once Republicans reclaim the majority [4]. Thus, reforming the filibuster also remains a promising possibility. 

The most obvious means of reforming the filibuster is lowering the current threshold of 60 votes required for cloture to a number less than 60 that still exceeds a simple majority. Some options include setting the threshold equal to the total number of present and voting members of the majority party. In addition to increasing the majority’s power, this system would still necessitate the cooperation of moderate and independent members. A threshold of 55 votes also appears statistically favorable by similarly lessening the minority’s influence while still requiring a bipartisan vote [10].

Other reforms such as the “mini-nuke” propose outlawing the filibuster only on certain measures in the same way Reid and McConnell utilized the nuclear option to eliminate the filibuster from judicial nominations [2]. Ideas have also circulated regarding eliminating “holds,” a parliamentary procedure in which Senate leaders prevent a bill from reaching the floor simply because a senator announced his intention to oppose it [10]. Disallowing dual-tracking, which allows the Senate to attend to other business in the midst of a filibuster, would also require senators to once again physically hold the floor during a filibuster [10]. Finally, establishing stricter time limits—such as lowering the 30 hours of consideration preceding the cloture vote to only eight hours—would allow the majority more leverage [10].
Overall, reform provides a promising approach to a bipartisan solution. Ultimately, however, whether or not the filibuster will endure as a force in the Senate depends on the outcome of the 2020 election.

References:
1. Toobin, Jeffrey. “It Really is Time to Get Rid of the Filibuster.” The New Yorker. August 6, 2020. https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/it-really-is-time-to-get-rid-of- the-filibuster.
2. Reynolds, Molly E. “What is the Senate Filibuster, and What Would it Take to Eliminate it?” Brookings Institution. September 9, 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/ policy2020/votervital/what-is-the-senate-filibuster-and-what-would-it-take-to-eliminate-it/.
3. Binder, Sarah A. “The History of the Filibuster.” Brookings Institution. April 22, 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/the-history-of-the-filibuster/.
4. Segers, Grace. “Filibuster or Bust: How Senate Democrats Could Get Rid of the Filibuster.” CBS News. August 12, 2020. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/filibuster-or- bust-how-the-senate-could-get-rid-of-the-filibuster/.
5. Levin, Carl and Arenberg, Richard A. “Don’t Fall for Filibuster Abolition. It’s a Trap.” The Washington Post. September 23, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ 2020/09/23/dont-fall- filibuster-abolition-its-trap/.
6. “Should Democrats eliminate the Senate filibuster the next time they control the chamber?” The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/ policy-2020/voting-changes/eliminate-senate-filibuster/.
7. Brownstein, Ronald. “The End of the Filibuster—No, Really.” The Atlantic. July 20, 2020. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/07/why-senate-filibuster- could-be-gone-2021/614278/.
8. Hulse, Carl. “Obama’s Call to Abolish Filibuster Puts Further Spotlight on the Tactic.” The New York Times. July 30, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/30/us/obama- filibuster-senate-democrats.html.
9. Schulte, Gabriela. “Poll: 15 Percent of Democratic Voters Want to Eliminate the Filibuster.” The Hill. August 11, 2020. https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/ 511576-poll-15-percent-of-democratic-voters-want-to-eliminate-the.
10. Lang, Tim and Strand, Mark. “The U.S. Filibuster: Options for Reform.” September 9, 2017. https://www.congressionalinstitute.org/2017/09/25/the-u-s-senate-filibuster- options-for-reform/#miscellaneous_reforms.
The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Aaron Tsui
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alexandra Kerrigan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Amanda Damayanti
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Arshiya Pant
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Catherine Tang
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Jewell
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Hannah Steinberg
    Harshit Rai
    Hennessis Umacta
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Ingrid Holmquist
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Khlood Awan
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyan Casamalhuapa
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Michael Merolla
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nathan Liu
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nicole Patel
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Paula Vekker
    Pheby Liu
    Pragat Patel
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Samantha Graines
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Tyler Ringhofer
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.