Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


The Dynamics of the Courts and Voting: The Effect of Partisan Courts on Voting in America

10/27/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Sneha Sharma
Sneha is a junior in the School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania majoring in Politics, Philosophy, & Economics and minoring in Healthcare Management and Engineering Entrepreneurship.
​Since the nomination of  Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, there have been murmurs of worry that the final nail will be hammered in the coffin of what is left of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The jurisdiction surrounding the right to vote is one of the most, if not the most, significant  Supreme Court decisions. The Supreme Court held in Yick Wo v. Hopkins in 1886 that voting is “fundamental” to the American system of self-government. The Constitution addresses voting in Article II and four subsequent amendments (the 15th, forbidding discrimination in voting on the basis "of race, color, or previous condition of servitude;" the 19th, forbidding discrimination in voting based on sex; the 24th, prohibiting "any poll tax" on a person before they can vote; and the 26th, granting the right to vote to all citizens over the age of 18).

As election season approaches, a recent spate of decisions by Conservative judges in the the two biggest states in the country —  such as the Fifth circuit decision to deny absentee ballots to those under 65 in TX, and the Eleventh circuit decision by Judge Pryor in FL to keep poll tax on ex-felons — are indirectly denying voting rights to thousands that could make all the difference between winning and losing. In Wisconsin, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruling set new limits to early voting. Conservative Judge Frank Easterbrook claimed that “legislators are entitled to consider politics when changing the rules about voting.” Election law expert Rick Hasen called it radical interpretation, “The Supreme Court has never held that partisan animus provides a legitimate basis for discriminatory voting rules.”

As the New York Times reported on September 25, even the Supreme Court has not given a comprehensive account of itself either.
"In two other cases this year, Federal District Court judges in Alabama and Texas made it easier for voters to cast absentee ballots in the light of the pandemic. In both instances, the Supreme Court, 5-4, with the five Republican-appointed justices in the majority, stopped the district courts from doing this."
In the 1980's, John Roberts worked as a law clerk for William Rehnquist, one of the most conservative Supreme Court justices, and voiced opposition to Congress shoring up VRA. In 2000, Justice Roberts and Barrett, along with Justice Brett Cavanaugh, were on the Bush legal team during the election imbroglio that resulted in the Supreme Court deciding in favor of Republican nominee Bush. As president, Bush returned the favor by selecting Roberts to fill the seat vacated by Rehnquist and become Chief Justice.

Since then, the dismantling of section 4(b) of VRA in Shelby County v. Holder (2013) and the decisions regarding gerrymandering, voter-id laws, mail-in-ballots, have cast a doubt on the integrity and impartiality of the highest court in the land.  In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld Ohio’s voter purge law Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute that allowed the state to remove voters from the rolls if they did not vote in three consecutive federal elections and did not respond to a mailed postcard, creating a precedent for other states to adopt a similar voter elimination system.

So, the pressing question for political and legal scholars remains how to ensure that democracy- as flawed as the US is (2019 EIU rankings had the US at 25) - doesn’t become victim to partisan battles in the courts. Politically appointed judges will always find thinnest legal precedence or create new strict legal interpretations to justify their decisions, but public opinion will ultimately decide if courts keep their legitimacy or are viewed as partisan hacks.

With a potential 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, it is likely that VRA will see further weakening and any new legislation to re-strengthen is likely to be met with a SCOTUS stonewall. When a state legislature can pass bills to override the opinions of the majority - 64 percent of Florida voters approved a historic ballot initiative, Amendment 4, restoring voting rights to people who’d been stripped of them due to felony convictions - and courts approve, then how do we as a nation justify that our democracy is stable? Both sides in a polarized political climate will vehemently defend their positions, but the status-quo and naked voter suppression attempts cannot go unchecked.  It is important that the three branches of government continue to function independently to serve the citizens in the system of checks-and-balances. If not, the downward slide of democracy will largely rest at the feet of the judiciary which appears to act as an extension of one political party.

Congress is not powerless and can do more to re-balance the legal structure in a way that is more representative of the population. Article III, section 1 of US Constitution states, “ The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Some scholars question if Congress should pass reforms so that lower courts are no longer able to hear lawsuits challenging the VRA. This suggestion arises from the concern that small-scale reform efforts are likely to face a hostile judiciary at both federal and lower courts. For example, Elizabeth Branch of the Eleventh Circuit, contrary to decades of precedent, even argued that people and organizations could not sue to enforce the Voting Rights Act.

Congress trying to limit the authority of the Supreme Court to hear voting rights and election related cases may result in constitutional crisis, but can a basis be found for Congress to limit the jurisdiction of federal judges? If all efforts to re-balance the judiciary are stymied, there will be a growing chorus among progressive voices to expand the judiciary.

​Some have suggested that a new court should be created that handles voting rights and democracy issues and can be benched by neutral judges, or equal numbers of judges from all major parties. Politics shouldn’t be involved in the decisions regarding voting rights because if a system is broken, then it stands that citizens cannot rely on the very same system to fix it.  Ultimately, the rhetoric of voting will shine throughout the 2020 election, making it interesting to see where dialogue about disenfranchisement goes after the votes are tallied in November.
The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

References
  1. 141, and 200. “The New Voter Suppression.” Brennan Center for Justice, September 2, 2020. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/new-voter-suppression.
  2. Berman, Ari. “Conservative Judicial Decisions Keep Boosting GOP Voter Suppression.” Mother Jones, September 11, 2020. https://www.motherjones.com/2020-elections/2020/09/florida-felon-voting-fines/.
  3. Hosam, Christian. “Perspective | The Supreme Court's Long War against Voting Rights.” The Washington Post. WP Company, April 1, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/made-by-history/wp/2018/06/15/the-supreme-courts-long-war-against-voting-rights/.
  4. Millhiser, Ian. “Chief Justice Roberts's Lifelong Crusade against Voting Rights, Explained.” Vox. Vox, September 18, 2020. https://www.vox.com/21211880/supreme-court-chief-justice-john-roberts-voting-rights-act-election-2020.
  5. Nichols, John. “Why Are Federal Jurists Cheering on Voter Suppression in Wisconsin?,” July 1, 2020. https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/early-voting-wisconsin-court/.
  6. Souter. “Felker v. Turpin, Warden, 518 U.S. 1051 (1996).” Legal Information Institute. Legal Information Institute, June 28, 1996. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-8836.ZC1.html.
  7. “Voter Suppression Threatens American Democracy: The Need to Prioritize Democratic Reform.” Alliance For Justice Action Campaign, August 5, 2020. https://afjactioncampaign.org/2020/08/06/voter-suppression-threatens-american-democracy-the-need-to-prioritize-democratic-reform/.
  8. ———. “11 Ways to Fix America's Fundamentally Broken Democracy,” September 14, 2020. https://www.vox.com/21336225/voting-rights-senate-electoral-college-gerrymandering-supreme-court.

Photo by Unseen Histories on Unsplash
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Aaron Tsui
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alexandra Kerrigan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Amanda Damayanti
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Arshiya Pant
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Catherine Tang
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Jewell
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Hannah Steinberg
    Harshit Rai
    Hennessis Umacta
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Ingrid Holmquist
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Khlood Awan
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyan Casamalhuapa
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Michael Merolla
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nathan Liu
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nicole Patel
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Paula Vekker
    Pheby Liu
    Pragat Patel
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Samantha Graines
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Tyler Ringhofer
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.