Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


Policymaking, Polarization, and the Judiciary

11/30/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture





​







By: Audrey Pan
Oulai "Audrey" Pan is a first-year student at the University of Pennsylvania's College of Arts and Sciences who plans to study political science and economics.

There are few who would deny that America is experiencing one of its most polarized periods yet. Common-sense public health measures such as mask-wearing have become widely debated amid a pandemic. Online interest in conspiracy theories soared by 651 percent just last year. Most disturbingly, a third of voters believe that the results of the most recent presidential election were fraudulent despite having no evidence. How did America arrive at such a polarized state? And how does polarization affect America’s governing apparatus beyond its day-to-day socioeconomic penetration?
​
To answer these questions, we must first understand what polarization is. In general terms, political polarization refers to increases in party extremity; in other words, the growing disagreement between various political parties [4].

There are three main forms of polarization: ideological, affective, and elite.

Ideological polarization refers to the growing differences in political beliefs, or the widening of the political spectrum, and is the most general form of polarization. Affective, or social, polarization refers to partisans’ intensifying disdain for people of opposing beliefs; it is correlated, but not dependent on ideological polarization. The two aforementioned forms of polarization are also often grouped together to be referred to as mass polarization. Meanwhile, elite polarization denotes the increasing partisan divides within the government, typically between Congress people of different parties [5].

It is hard to pinpoint the exact causes of political polarization in the United States. That said, polarization can generally be traced to prolonged social sorting and news divisions.

During the past several decades, people have increasingly sorted themselves into politically homogenous groups that align with their social identities such as race, ethnicity, geographic location, and income level [6]. As a result, intergroup bias is a significant cause of polarization. People are inclined to favor the beliefs of those within their in-groups—groups to which one belongs—and distrust beliefs of out-group members [7].

When an individual is part of numerous in-groups that do not overlap, that means that there is a greater variety of people that they would consider to be within their in-groups. For example, someone can be a middle class doctor while also being a member of a religion. In that case, they’d be part of both the middle class in-group as well as their religious in-group, but people in their socioeconomic in-group may be of different religions and people in their religious in-group may be of different socio-economic classes, thus creating cross-cutting identities. With more cross-cutting in-groups, the chances of an individual seeing another as a complete out-group member is slim and there would be a lesser probability for individual conflicts and, by proxy, group conflicts. However, when social sorting aligned social and partisan groups, individuals no longer have as many overlapping identities. This process creates social echo chambers with the ideal conditions for political self-radicalization.

This effect is only further exacerbated by news divisions. According to a Hill-HarrisX poll, an overwhelming majority of Americans in both parties believe that news reporting fuels partisan division, and they are partially correct [8]. It is not merely that media outlets are drifting to either side of the political spectrum but instead that people are choosing to consume different news. 

White House correspondent John Yang interviewed a Democrat, a Republican, and an Independent, all in the Phoenix, Arizona area, and found that they consume vastly different news. The Democrat reported reading CNN and the New York Times, the Republican favored Fox News and Laura Ingraham, while the Independent relied on his Twitter feed, which is comprised of a mix of sources. Yang’s findings are a microcosm of a broader trend in which the electorate “can choose from personalized news sources that not only serves to inform them, but also reinforces their world view” [9].

As the masses polarize, politicians follow, especially since the loudest voices are typically those on the far left or right of the political spectrum and not the average moderate voter, emboldening politicians to take on more extreme ideological positions. In fact, DW-NOMINATE scores—used to measure the difference in ideology within Congress—from the past century reveal that the level of current partisan conflict is the highest it has been since the 1920s [10].

As a result of the rise in elite polarization, Congress is more deadlocked than ever, and compromises are no longer universally praised by the electorate [11]. Policymakers recognize this dysfunction. For example, Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska declared that “Congress is weaker than it has been in decades,” a sentiment that was echoed by Senator Angus King of Maine, who compared the Senate to “a high school football team that hasn’t won a game in five years” [12]. 

The consequences of such partisanship have spilt over to federal judicial nominations. Though political ideology had long been a factor in presidents’ judicial selection, presidents have only begun to emphasize the ideological reliability of potential judges during the Clinton administration, after Reagon appointed two conservative justices to the Supreme Court who became swing votes [13].

This shift is accompanied by a polarization of the Senate confirmation process. In the 1980s and 1990s, Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsberg received votes from almost every Senator despite being ideological opposites. Two decades later, justices are now confirmed with nearly perfect party line votes [14]. Such polarization is also reflected in lower court nominations. For instance, after Republicans gained control of the Senate in 2014, they blocked nearly 100 of Obama’s nominations, leaving 105 vacant seats on the federal judiciary when Trump entered office [15].

Not only did polarization transform the judicial nomination process, but it also changed how the courts decided controversial cases. Take the Supreme Court, for example; the percentage of decisions with only a one vote margin have significantly increased in the past decade along with the number of unanimous opinions [16]. In other words, justices of the same caucus have increasingly similar ideological and legal positions while the liberal and conservative caucuses are moving apart.

All of these impacts have severely undermined the government’s credibility. As voters witnessed numerous threats of government shutdowns (and actual shutdowns) and delays on passing critical bills such as COVID-19 relief this past spring, many have lost faith in Congress’s ability to solve real-world problems [17]. The judiciary too, is increasingly viewed as a partisan body that no longer fulfills its role as a check on executive and legislative power [18].

Ultimately, polarization is a phenomenon that has ebbed and flowed since the dawn of American democracy, with no foreseeable end. That said, it is not irreparable. Perhaps the first steps we can take as individuals to depolarize is to recognize our own biases, reach beyond ideologically homogeneous bubbles, and elect leaders who are willing to do the same. Only then can we begin to remove our partisan binds and bridge these debilitating divides.



[1] Padilla, Mariel. “Who's Wearing a Mask? Women, Democrats and City Dwellers.” The New York Times, June 2, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/health/coronavirus-face-masks-surveys.html. 

[2] Francescani, Chris. “QAnon: What Is It and How Did We Get Here?” ABC News, August 20, 2020. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/qanon-/story?id=72350231. 

[3] Greenwood, Max. “One-Third of Americans Believe Biden Won Because of Voter Fraud: Poll.” The Hill, June 21, 2021. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/559402-one-third-of-americans-believe-biden-won-because-of-voter-fraud-poll. 

[4] “Political Polarization.” Pew Research Center, January 27, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/topics/political-polarization/.

[5] Banda, Kevin K., and John Cluverius. “Elite Polarization, Party Extremity, and Affective Polarization.” Electoral Studies 56 (2018): 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.009. 

[6] Mason, Lilliana. ​Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity.​ Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2018.

[7] Klein, Ezra. ​Why We're Polarized.​ Avid Reader Press/Simon & Schuster, 2020.

[8] Bonn, Tess. “Poll: Overwhelming Majority Say News Media Making Us More Politically Divided.” The Hill, January 21, 2020. https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/478833-poll-overwhelming-majority-say-news-media-making-us-more-politically-divided. 

[9] “How Politically Polarized Media Is Driving Our Alternative Realities.” Public Broadcasting Service, April 21, 2017. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/politically-polarized-media-driving-alternative-realities. 

[10] McCarty, Nolan. “The Consequences of Partisan Polarization in the United States.” Berkeley Haas, November 2018. https://haas.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/McCarty.doc. 

[11] Calmes, Jackie. “Deficit Reduction Plan Draws Scorn from Left and Right.” The New York Times, November 12, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/12/us/politics/12fiscal.html. 

[12] Stolberg, Sheryl, and Nicholas Fandos. “As Gridlock Deepens in Congress, Only Gloom Is Bipartisan.” The New York Times, January 27, 2018. http://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/27/us/politics/congress-dysfunction-conspiracies-trump.html.

[13] Hasen, Richard L. “Polarization and the Judiciary.” Annual Review of Political Science 22, no. 1 (2019): 261–76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051317-125141.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Greenberg, Jon. “Fact-Check: Why Barack Obama Failed to Fill over 100 Judgeships.” PolitiFact, October 2, 2020. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/oct/02/donald-trump/fact-check-why-barack-obama-failed-fill-over-100-j/.

[16] Hasen, “Polarization and the Judiciary.”

[17] Enten, Harry. “The Government Shutdown Effect: Big in the Short Term, Small after That.” FiveThirtyEight, January 20, 2018. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-government-shutdown-effect-big-in-the-short-term-small-after-that/. 

[18] Liptak, Adam. “Supreme Court Says Judges Are Above Politics. It May Hear a Case Testing That View.” The New York Times, September 16, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/16/us/politics/supreme-court-judges-partisanship.html.
​
​The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Aaron Tsui
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alexandra Kerrigan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Amanda Damayanti
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Arshiya Pant
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Catherine Tang
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Jewell
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Hannah Steinberg
    Harshit Rai
    Hennessis Umacta
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Ingrid Holmquist
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Khlood Awan
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyan Casamalhuapa
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Michael Merolla
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nathan Liu
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nicole Patel
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Paula Vekker
    Pheby Liu
    Pragat Patel
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Samantha Graines
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Tyler Ringhofer
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.