Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


Polish Court's Ruling on Abortion: A Violation of the International Human Rights Law

12/11/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
By: Akshita Tiwary

Akshita Tiwary is a 3rd year law student at Government Law College, Mumbai, India. She serves as an Assistant Editor for JURIST, University of Pittsburgh, and is keenly interested in international law, human rights and constitutional law. She may be reached at [email protected].


INTRODUCTION
On October 22, 2020, a constitutional tribunal in Poland ruled that abortions in case of fetal abnormalities are illegal, as it violates the constitutional right to life of the fetus [1]. This decision has resulted in mass protests across the nation [2]. The ruling effectively tightens abortion laws further in a country which already has one of the strictest abortion regulations in Europe.
While pronouncing the decision, the tribunal’s President, Julia Przylebska, stated that terminating a pregnancy due to fetal defects legalized “eugenic practices with regard to an unborn child, thus denying it the respect and protection of human dignity.” Since the Polish Constitution guarantees the right to life to every individual, abortions in such cases would constitute “a directly forbidden form of discrimination”. Henceforth, abortions will only be allowed in cases of rape, incest or where the mother’s health is at risk [3]. 

Banning abortions in the case of fetal deformities contravenes several women’s rights enumerated under international human rights law treaties. In this article, I will elaborate on these rights and explore how Poland’s recent ruling has violated them. 

CONCEPT OF REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY UNDER INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
The Convention on the Elimination of All forms of Discrimination against Women, 1979 affirms women’s right to reproductive choice and autonomy. Article 16(1)(e) guarantees women the equal right to “decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of their children” [4]. Poland, having ratified this Convention without any reservations, is legally bound to enforce this right domestically [5]. 
​

The International Conference on Population and Development, 1994 (ICPD) played a major role in recognising the concept of reproductive autonomy. Women’s reproductive autonomy, which was earlier the subject of population control, metamorphosed into a personal choice to exercise their own sexual and reproductive rights [6]. Poland was amongst the 180 countries that participated in this conference [7]. 

Chapter VII of the Programme of Action adopted at the ICPD elaborately discussed reproductive rights and health. Paragraph 7.2 of the Programme of Action explains how reproductive health implies that “people have the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when and how often to do so.” This depicts the right of women to make all decisions pertaining to reproductive health.

Thus, reproductive autonomy entails that a woman is independent to make informed choices regarding her sexual and reproductive health. Coercing a woman to give birth to a child with development issues infringes the right to reproductive autonomy. Such a situation can severely affect the mother’s mental health and well-being, which would stand in violation of the right to health provided under Article 12(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [8]. 

VIOLATION OF OTHER RELATED RIGHTS OF WOMEN 
In order to preserve the unborn child’s right to life, the ruling failed to take into account the impact on other related rights of women. General Comment No. 22 (2016) analyses the right to sexual and reproductive health as a fundamental component of right to health [9]. Paragraph 10 elucidates on the interdependence between the right to sexual and reproductive health, and other civil and political rights like right to life, personal liberty and security. Criminalising abortion forces women to resort to illegal abortions, which are often unsafe and risk the mother’s health significantly. Hence, it leads to an increase in maternal mortality and morbidity, which consequently contravenes women’s right to life, liberty and security. Paragraph 8 of General Comment No. 36 (2018) on right to life, given under Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, evaluates this issue [10]. It stipulates that states should provide access to safe abortion so that women are not compelled either to resort to unsafe methods, or to undergo substantial pain and suffering. 

Reproductive autonomy additionally comes within the domain  of the right to privacy. All decisions pertaining to an individual’s body remain private in nature. The constitutional tribunal’s judgment to prohibit abortions in cases of fetal defects breaches the right to privacy by pressurizing women to give birth, thus taking away their right to make an independent choice regarding their bodily integrity and dignity. Therefore, the ruling, revolving around a biological function, discriminates against women by encroaching upon the principle of equality and non-discrimination that is codified in innumerable international instruments. 

ANALYSING THE DECISION THROUGH A EUROPEAN LENS 
The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) envisages reproductive rights as part of the right to privacy given under Article 8 of the Convention [11]. This includes an access to abortion, when sought for reasons of health and/or well-being [12]. In the case of R. R. v. Poland, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) recognised that carelessness on part of medical authorities to inform a woman in time of certain fetal deformities, which deprived her of the option of abortion, constituted a violation of Articles 3 (no one shall be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment) and 8 of the ECHR [13]. Since the woman could not get an abortion within the legally specified time-frame, bringing up the severely ill-child had a distressing impact on her personal and family life. Furthermore, in the case of Vo v. France, the ECtHR upheld that it was not really possible or desirable to determine if an unborn child is a person, and if the fetus can be entitled to the right to life guaranteed under Article 2 of the ECHR [14].

Applying these principles to the present scenario demonstrates how the Polish tribunal gravely endangered women’s rights. It consciously chose to uphold the right to life of an unborn fetus over the right to life, health and privacy of the woman carrying the child. In doing so, the tribunal itself transgressed Article 47 of the Polish Constitution which embodies the right to make decisions about one’s personal life [15]. It also overlooked the fact that providing for a child born of fetal deformities requires excessive emotional and financial investment, which not every woman can afford [16]. This further marginalizes certain sections of women, in addition to causing them the mental trauma of bringing up a handicapped child when they are not ready. The mistaken ruling thus completely discards women’s power to make choices regarding their own bodies, thereby disrupting their private and family life. 

CONCLUSION
As specified in paragraph 28 of General Comment No. 22, it is the duty of states to liberalize restrictive abortion laws. The obligations of respect, protect and fulfil requires state entities (like judiciary) to not defy the right of women to make autonomous decisions regarding their reproductive health. Previous periodic reports on Poland by international bodies too have suggested the liberalisation of restrictive abortion laws [17, 18].

The tribunal’s decision has attracted criticism worldwide, including denunciation by the Commissioner for Human Rights at the Council of Europe [19]. Given intense protests, the Polish government has delayed the implementation of the judgment [20]. However, it is important to realize the decision’s vastly adverse effects on women’s rights and empowerment. Implementing such a ruling can negate the persistent efforts undertaken over the course of several years to successfully grant women the right to personal autonomy. Therefore, it is in Poland’s best interests to liberalize its legal views on abortion in order to fulfil its commitments concerning women’s rights under international human rights law. 
​
​REFERENCES
[1] Pronczuk, Monica. “Poland Court Ruling Effectively Bans Legal Abortions.” The New York Times. October 22, 2020. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/world/europe/poland-tribunal-abortions.html?searchResultPosition=5. 
[2] Pronczuk, Monica. “Why Are There Protests in Poland.” The New York Times. October 27, 2020. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/world/europe/poland-abortion-ruling-protests.html. 
[3] Shukla, Shivanjali. “Poland Constitutional Court tightens abortion restrictions.” JURIST. October 24, 2020. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://www.jurist.org/news/2020/10/poland-constitutional-court-court-tightens-abortion-restrictions/.
[4] “Convention on the Elimination of All forms of Discrimination against Women.” UN Women. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/text/econvention.htm#article12. 
[5] “Convention on the Elimination of All forms of Discrimination against Women.” United Nations Treaty Collection. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-8&chapter=4&lang=en. 
[6] Shalev, Carmel. “Rights to Sexual and Reproductive Health- the ICPD and the Convention on the Elimination of All forms of Discrimination against Women.” International Conference on Reproductive Health, Mumbai (India). March 18, 1998. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/shalev.htm#:~:text=The%20right%20to%20autonomy%20in,fundamental%20human%20right%20to%20liberty.&text=Moreover%2C%20article%2015%20guarantees%20women's,and%20to%20full%20legal%20capacity. 
[7] “Report of the International Conference on Population and Development.” United Nations. September 5-13, 1994. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/icpd_en.pdf. 
[8] “International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Accessed December 2, 2020. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx.
​
[9] “General Comment No. 22.” United Nations Economic and Social Council. Accessed December 3, 2020. http://docstore.ohchr.org/SelfServices/FilesHandler.ashx?enc=4slQ6QSmlBEDzFEovLCuW1a0Szab0oXTdImnsJZZVQfQejF41Tob4CvIjeTiAP6sGFQktiae1vlbbOAekmaOwDOWsUe7N8TLm%2BP3HJPzxjHySkUoHMavD%2Fpyfcp3Ylzg.
[10] “General Comment No. 36.” Human Rights Committee. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CCPR/CCPR_C_GC_36.pdf.
[11] “Guide on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.” European Court of Human Rights. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_8_eng.pdf. 
[12] Case of A, B and C v. Ireland, Application no. 25579/05 (2010). European Court of Human Rights. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22dmdocnumber%22:[%22878721%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-102332%22]}.
[13] Case of R. R. v. Poland, Application no. 27617/04 (2011). European Court of Human Rights. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22dmdocnumber%22:[%22885774%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-104911%22]}.
[14] Case of Vo v. France, Application no. 53924/00 (2004). European Court of Human Rights. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://www.globalhealthrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ECtHR-2004-Vo-v-France.pdf.
[15] The Constitution of the Republic of Poland. April 2, 1997. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm.
[16] “Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly.” British Pregnancy Advisory Service. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://www.bpas.org/get-involved/campaigns/briefings/fetal-anomaly/.
[17] “Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee on Poland.” United Nations Human Rights Committee. Accessed December 3, 2020. http://docstore.ohchr.org/SelfServices/FilesHandler.ashx?enc=6QkG1d%2FPPRiCAqhKb7yhstazfkB2WLZhxlPrVe5TzqNnRyOijUuCqK5T0EmzWPeEFHTMAa8FKMz5a%2BscJyDkNnjMPEsyr0Ex4coCfcKqJMutWG%2BztxRVCpnTAQ3Lz4SE.
[18] “Sixth periodic report of States parties: Poland.” United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://undocs.org/CEDAW/C/POL/6.
[19] Commissioner for Human Rights Tweet. Twitter. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://twitter.com/CommissionerHR/status/1319273573240893452. 
[20] Pronczuk, Monica. “Poland Delays a Near-Total Ban on Abortion.” The New York Times. November 4, 2020. Accessed December 3, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/04/world/europe/poland-abortion-law-delay.html. 

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Aaron Tsui
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alexandra Kerrigan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Amanda Damayanti
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Arshiya Pant
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Catherine Tang
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Jewell
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Hannah Steinberg
    Harshit Rai
    Hennessis Umacta
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Ingrid Holmquist
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Khlood Awan
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyan Casamalhuapa
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Michael Merolla
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nathan Liu
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nicole Patel
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Paula Vekker
    Pheby Liu
    Pragat Patel
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Samantha Graines
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Tyler Ringhofer
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.