Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


A Crowded Intersection: The Battle Between Religious and Secular Interests in the US Political Sphere

1/25/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Georgia Ray
Georgia Ray is a sophomore in the College of Arts and Sciences majoring in Cognitive Science and Urban Studies


The leaves are finally beginning to change, the weather is getting colder, and Thanksgiving is right around the corner. Soon, families will gather to prepare mash potatoes, eat so much turkey they have to loosen their pants, and avoid talking about religion and politics at all costs. Discussing politics is provocative and the only thing that rivals politics in its divisiveness is religion. The intersection of religion and politics is a collision of ideals, morals, powerful people, hidden motives, uninformed beliefs, good intentions, and age old traditions. The old meets the new as millennia old belief systems try to reconcile their power with new age democracies, creating the United States as we know it today. However, in the modern battle between church and state, religious institutions have learned to harness their power in cohesive institutions to create a balance tipped in favor of those practicing a faith.
Much of the power that religious groups hold comes from their ability to mobilize like- minded individuals. As defined by Wikipedia, “A voting bloc is a group of voters that are strongly motivated by a specific common concern or group of concerns to the point that such specific concerns tend to dominate their voting patterns, causing them to vote together in elections” (Voting Bloc). Religious institutions are unparalleled in their ability to create voting blocs. Their beliefs are ingrained in followers since birth and religious values are taught to be appreciated above all else. Because religious institutions have established such a strong following with their “my sheep hear my voice; I know them, and they follow me” (John 10:27) attitude, they are able to influence legislators who are too fearful to lose such a large constituency of votes.

Legislators are predisposed to be generous towards religious legislation, but this predisposition can lead them to be blinded by flashy titles and clever tactics, preventing research that would reveal the extent of the consequences of certain legislation. In a landmark case that built up to some of the most meaningful religious legislation to date, Employment Division v. Smith, the Supreme Court ruled that two drug counselors, who had been fired due to their religious use of peyote, could not collect unemployment benefits. Scalia, who wrote the majority opinion, explained that while religious persons were allowed to believe whatever they wanted to believe, thanks to the Establishment Clause, they are not allowed to supersede the laws of the nation to practice said beliefs. He proposed that the litigants pursue a legislative path to get an exception for the religious use of peyote, rather than working through the courts. They did so, but religious lobbyists took it even a step further, by convincing legislators to pass The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). They used the decision in Employment Division v. Smith as a rallying cry to convince others that the state of religious protection in the United States had decreased. The new protections provided by RFRA were unprecedented compared to what had been seen before in the United States (despite the use of the word restoration) and they were levied heavily in favor of religious persons, but because the title, many a legislator (and lobbyist) assumed that this act was simply a return to the religious protection of days past. In fact, even the ACLU backed the act, only to renege their support years later when they learned religious persons were invoking it to deny service to LGBT persons and other minorities (Melling). RFRA clearly used a clever title to mask its real intentions, which was to raise the interests of religious persons above all other interests in the United States.

Even when lawmakers do their research, there are ways for societally condemnable practices by religious people to slip through the cracks. This is seen by the actions of Haldeman and Ehrlichman, two influential Christian Scientists in the Nixon administration. One of the last things Nixon did while in office was help pass the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. This act, wrought with good intentions, was undermined by Halseman and Ehrlichman who inserted a clause reading “No parent or guardian who in good faith is providing a child treatment solely by spiritual means — such as prayer — according to the tenets and practices of a recognized church through a duly accredited practitioner shall for that reason alone be considered to have neglected the child” (Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act). This exception allows parents to continue faith healings which can lead to painful and unnecessary deaths for their children. Polygamy is another example of a religious conviction slipping through the cracks. Despite having been technically outlawed, polygamy is all but ignored in Utah, on a legal level. More than 90% of Utahns believe polygamy should be punished more harshly yet, “state and local officials seem reluctant to confront the issue head-on, leaving the furor to dominate discussions around water coolers instead of talks at the state's highest levels” (Byram). This hesitation in persecuting religious groups stems directly from the religious blocs they have created. Politicians in Utah know that if they cracked down on polygamy, they would lose the votes of that community, and that is simply not a risk they are willing to take. Too often, lawmakers are afraid to risk their official position, and in doing so they end up ignoring the opinions of majority voters, out of fear of losing the votes of the vocal minority.

This is only a fear that is confirmed in the recent midterm elections. Of all voters, 72% report attending church and 26% of all voters were white Evangelicals or born again Christians (Sciupac). Politicians see these numbers and are too afraid to cross religious groups because they make up such a large section of the voting population. In fact, Senator Manchin, who was just up for reelection is a great example. He was “up for reelection in a state the president won by nearly 42 percentage points over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election” (King), and as such he was the only Democrat to vote for highly religious Kavanaugh in the Senate confirmation hearings leading up to election day.

This disparity between the treatment of religious and secular interests is not in line with how our country was conceived. Thomas Jefferson coined the phrase “separation between church and state,” but since its inception, his words have been twisted to create an America that is church over state, rather than a separation between the two. As The Nation reports, “Somehow the separation of church and state has come to mean blocking the state from protecting the civil rights of citizens and forcing it to support—and pay for—sectarianism, bigotry, superstition and bullying” (Pollitt). Religious persons are winning the battle at the intersection today, as they are able to control legislation from behind the scenes and form powerful voting blocs that bend the decisions of lawmakers to their wishes.

Religion is not an evil entity, and good reasons exist for protecting in many circumstances, however not in a way that disproportionately champions it over secular interests as is happening today. The time has come for lawmakers to do their research, stand up against religious convictions that are slipping through the cracks, and critically question whether supporting religious ideas is truly best for the community, or simply the best way to get a quick group of votes. Of course, this is easier said than done, and to assume that it would happen overnight would be the picture of nativity, but the power of a democracy, the power of America, is that one can always dream.

References
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. ___ (2014)
Byram, Cala. “Polygamy Is Called Too Hard to Prosecute.” DeseretNews.com, Deseret News, 31
Aug. 1998, www.deseretnews.com/article/649627/Polygamy-is-called-too-hard-to- prosecute.html.
Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smith, 494 U. S. 872 (1990)
Ferguson, John. “RLUIPA, Religious Buildings & Zoning.” Freedom Forum Institute, 2008,
www.freedomforuminstitute.org/first-amendment-center/topics/freedom-of-religion/free- exercise-clause-overview/rluipa-religious-buildings-zoning/.
King, Ledyard. “'Very, Very Difficult Vote': The Wavering Senators Who Decided Whether Brett Kavanaugh Joins the Supreme Court.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 5 Oct. 2018, www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/10/05/brett- kavanaughs-fate-depend-how-these-wavering-senators-vote/1533223002/.
Melling, Louise. “The Religious Freedom Restoration Act Is Used to Discriminate. Let's Fix It.” American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union, 11 Aug. 2016, www.aclu.org/blog/religious-liberty/using-religion-discriminate/religious-freedom- restoration-act-used.
Podrebarac Sciupac, Elizabeth, and Gregory A Smith. “How Religious Groups Voted in the
Midterm Elections.” Pew Research Center, Pew Research Center, 7 Nov. 2018, www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/11/07/how-religious-groups-voted-in-the-midterm- elections/.
Pollitt, Katha. “Why It's Time to Repeal the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.” The Nation, 29
June 2015, www.thenation.com/article/why-its-time-repeal-religious-freedom- restoration-act/.
“Presidential Vote by Religious Affiliation and Race.” Pew Research Center, 9 Nov. 2016,
www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016- analysis/ft_16-11-09_relig_exitpoll_religrace/.
“Religious Freedom Restoration Acts: Real Consequences for All Americans.” Freedom for All Americans, 14 Mar. 2016, www.freedomforallamericans.org/religious-freedom- restoration-acts-real-consequences-for-all-americans/.
The Bible. The New Oxford Annotated Version, 3rd ed., Oxford UP, 2001.
“Voting Bloc.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 15 May 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Voting_bloc.
Wilson-Hartgrove, Jonathan. “The Evangelical Case Against Judge Kavanaugh.” The New York
Times, The New York Times, 3 Sept. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/09/03/opinion/ evangelical-brett-kavanaugh-civil-rights.html.


Photo Credit: Unsplash: Jomar https://unsplash.com/photos/1HtojWDvEWE

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

​
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Aaron Tsui
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alexandra Kerrigan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Amanda Damayanti
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Arshiya Pant
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Catherine Tang
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Jewell
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Hannah Steinberg
    Harshit Rai
    Hennessis Umacta
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Ingrid Holmquist
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Khlood Awan
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyan Casamalhuapa
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Michael Merolla
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nathan Liu
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nicole Patel
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Paula Vekker
    Pheby Liu
    Pragat Patel
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Samantha Graines
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Tyler Ringhofer
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.