Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

The Supreme Court: From the Inside

10/29/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Kaitlyn Rentala
Kaitlyn Rentala is a sophomore in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania studying Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE).
​On October 8, the Supreme Court heard three major cases about Title VII and discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. The first case, Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, which was consolidated with the second case, Altitude Express v. Zarda, dealt with whether or not sexual orientation was a subset of sex, which is protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The third case, R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, dealt with whether or not transgender status or gender identity was protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [1] Both cases were toted as the biggest cases to be heard in front of the Supreme Court during this term, and could prove to be landmark decisions with major ramifications for both sides. I was one of the lucky 62 members of the public to sit in on oral arguments.
Back in September, my incredible Legal Studies professor, Professor Amanda Shanor, organized a class field trip to hear the Title VII cases. We all knew it was a bit absurd to go and try to hear oral arguments for such high profile cases, but we also understood that this was a once in a lifetime opportunity. To go would be to experience history in the making firsthand. The process of getting inside the Supreme Court was extensive:getting to the Supreme Court at four in the afternoon the previous day, sleeping in the rain on the sidewalk outside of the Court building, and dealing with protestors and reporters shouting throughout the early morning hours. I got no sleep, was attacked by mosquitos, and missed my train on the account of a lost Uber driver. Yet, it was, without a doubt, one of the happiest days of my life. I would do it all again in an instant, just to witness the Court in action.

To provide some background on the three cases, the petitioner in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, Gerald Bostock, is a gay man who has worked for Clayton County as a child welfare services coordinator since 2003. After joining a gay recreational softball league, Bostock received criticism for his participation in the league from co-workers. Ultimately, this led to an internal audit of his department and his subsequent firing by his supervisor [2]. Bostock filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunities Commision(EEOC), and three years later filed a lawsuit against the county arguing that discrimination based on sexual orientation was a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Similarly in the 2010 case of Altitude Express v. Zarda, Donald Zarda was a skydiving instructor who disclosed that he was a gay man to a female client, when the female client was worried about being strapped so intimately to a man. Zarda’s boss was informed and Zarda was subsequently fired. Subsequently, Zarda filed a discrimination charge with the EEOC, claiming that he was fired due to his sexual orientation and because he did not conform to male gendered stereotypes.

In R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Aimee Stephens was fired from her position as a funeral director at R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., a for-profit company that runs several funeral homes in Michigan, after informing her employer she would be transitioning from male to female [3]. Stephens filed a complaint with the EEOC alleging that she had been discriminated on the basis of sex. The question presented in this case inquires whether or not Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on transgender status or sex stereotypes.

During oral arguments for the first two cases regarding sexual orientation, Pam Karlan, the lawyer for the petitioner, primarily argued that a close reading of the text of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bans discrimination on the basis of sex, which intrinsically includes sexual orientation. She states, to fire a man because he is a married to another man and not to a woman is inherently discrimination based on sex. Furthermore, Karlan refutes the argument that Congress did not intend for sexual orientation to be included under sex and therefore sexual orientation is not protected under Title VII. Using the example that sexual harassment was not protected under Title VII but is not considered to be, Karlan maintained that the same parallel could be drawn to protect sexual oriention under sex. Her opposing council, Jeffrey Harris, argued that sexual orientation is distinct from sex and therefore is not protected under Title VII [4]. He further maintained that the intent of Congress while enacting Title VII should be taken into consideration, and Congress clearly did not intend for sexual orientation to be a subset of Title VII.

The attorney for the respondent, David Cole of the ACLU, asserted that Aimee Stephens was discriminated against because she failed to conform to sex stereotypes [4]. That is, Stephens couldn’t be fired for failing to adhere to traditional male stereotypes, which is inherently sex discrimination as protected under Title VII. The opposing counsel for the funeral home, John Bursch, argued that treating men and women equally does not mean therefore you must treat men as women. Citing this example, Bursch sought to subvert the sex stereotype argument.

​These cases have the capability to establish important precedent that could change the course of equality and history. Being present at the Court on that momentous day was an overwhelmingly inspirational sensation. Quite literally, I witnessed democracy and the judicial process in action. Seeing the greatest legal minds of our generation earnestly debate the merits of these cases with such purpose and intelligence served as a restorative measure in my faith in the greatness of American society.

​The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
References
​[1] “Supreme Court Hears Two Major Cases Today on Title VII and Discrimination.” National Constitution Center – Constitutioncenter.org, constitutioncenter.org/blog/supreme-court-hears-two-major-cases-today-on-title-vii-and-discrimination.
[2] “{{Meta.pageTitle}}.” {{Meta.siteName}}, 2019, www.oyez.org/cases/2019/17-1618.
[3] “{{Meta.pageTitle}}.” {{Meta.siteName}}, 2019, www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-107.
​[4] “Justices Divided on Federal Protections for LGBT Employees (UPDATED).” Amy Howe, 8 Oct. 2019, amylhowe.com/2019/10/08/justices-divided-on-federal-protections-for-lgbt-employees/.
Photo Credits: https://flic.kr/p/WGQRCm by ​Jeff Stoltzfus
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sam Nadler
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​