Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

The Carbon Tax: Protecting Our Planet Is Worth the Price

12/8/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Hailie Goldsmith
Hailie Goldsmith is a student in the College of Arts & Sciences, University of Pennsylvania.

Substantial research has already been conducted on climate change, showing that the impending consequences span from rising sea levels to high-intensity storms. These effects, already devastating for environmental and ecological reasons, will also create a heavy financial burden for many regions of the world, especially for cities located on coasts. At this point in time, the prices of climate-change-causing-pollutants like carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide currently do not match the financial costs of the damage they cause [1]. This is because large fossil-fuel-burning-corporations do not factor in the impacts of carbon emissions, which are more technically called “external costs” [2]. A carbon tax would collect revenue to pay for these “external costs.”
According to the Tax Policy Center, a carbon tax is a tax levied on carbon dioxide and other select greenhouse gas emissions in hopes of deterring businesses and governments from producing harmful emissions that propagate climate change [1]. The tax targets energy-producing corporations that burn fossil fuels. 

Canada currently boasts the most progressive carbon pricing program in the world, starting at $15 per ton of carbon dioxide and progressing to $38 per ton of CO2 by 2022. In 2016, the United States hypothesized that the enactment of a nationwide carbon tax could raise about $1 trillion in its first decade [1]. The United States has not yet passed a carbon tax, but forty international governments have enacted their own versions of a carbon tax, ranging from direct taxation to a cap-and-trade program [3].

A cap-and-trade program is a different mechanism for governments to place a price on carbon. The program dissuades companies from emitting carbon by taxing them for exceeding a carbon emission limit and incentivizes companies who remain below the limit by allowing them to sell their remaining carbon “credits” to companies who refuse to lower their carbon emissions [3].

Fears about rising energy prices, leading to political standstill in many countries, force carbon taxes to remain moderate, which inhibits their ability to actually mitigate climate change [3]. The European Union put in place a broad cap-and-trade program, but it was met with limited success. Their program only applied to a relatively small portion of greenhouse gas emissions and did not set high enough prices to push any nation to reduce their emissions [3]. To create a successful cap-and-trade program, the United States would need a stronger and more expansive policy than that enacted by the European Union.

However, a gridlocked and unproductive Congress in the U.S. has led to inaction with regards to federally mandating a carbon pricing program of any kind. Therefore, any chances for cutting down carbon emissions through cap-and-trade or direct taxation must come directly from state-level action [3].

Nine states located in the Northeastern U.S. have formed the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and imposed a cap-and-trade program, stipulating that energy-producing corporations buy permits to release greenhouse gases [3]. Compared to other countries’ progressive programs, these states only price a metric ton of CO2 at $5, and even California, known for its more environmentally-conscious legislation, prices a ton of carbon at only $15, though California applies the carbon tax to 85% of carbon-emitting sources [3].

Those in favor of a free, unregulated market worry about the potentially disastrous economic implications, particularly international trade concerns, such as pushing energy-producing companies to move overseas, which would reduce a country’s gross domestic product (GDP) [2]. This feared phenomenon is known as “carbon leakage,” which refers to the movement of carbon-intensive manufacturing plants overseas to avoid the carbon tax [4]. To prevent this detrimental economic consequence, concerned economists recommend that border carbon tax adjustments accompany the passage of carbon taxes in order to place tariffs on imported goods and services to preserve the competitiveness of energy-production firms and decrease the allure of tax-free overseas locations [4]. However, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade renders the border tax adjustments illegal, which further complicates the matter [4].

There is also a huge concern regarding the potential for the tax to disproportionately impact lower socio-economic individuals because poorer people tend to spend a larger share of their family income on gasoline and other energy-related services [3]. A proposed solution is to make the carbon tax “revenue neutral,” which would use a specific portion of the tax’s revenue to offset the unequal burden faced by poorer individuals [2].

Even if a government finally passes a carbon tax, the undertaking of determining how high to price the cost of emissions created from burning coal, oil, and gas will be a challenge [3]. It is a lengthy process to set the price of the carbon tax and to determine the size of the tax base [4]. The U.S. government attempted to rectify this barrier by developing a policy tool known as the “social cost of carbon,” which assigns a price to the total negative effects on the environment, community health, and businesses caused by a single metric ton of emitted carbon [2]. However, the results produced by this policy equation are tricky considering that the bulk of the most damaging and enduring effects are unknown and in the future.

Another main worry tied to carbon tax programs has to do with the way in which the revenue collected from the carbon tax programs is distributed because people argue about where the revenue should be invested [2]. Should we contribute to solving current issues related to the environment, public health, and social inequality, or should we invest in technological research, green infrastructure, and the development of renewable energies? One thing is clear: interest groups and organizations will all be vying for a cut of the collected revenue [5].

Nations find it hard to balance the costs of climate change and the costs of reducing their most lucrative economic industries. The biggest hurdle for the carbon tax is referred to by economists as the Iron Law of Climate Policy, which illustrates that economic growth is currently and consistently prioritized over the protection and preservation of the Earth’s climate. At this point in time, fossil fuels account for about 85 percent of the world’s energy, so countries must start making climate change legislation like the carbon tax a top item on their agenda [5]. The potential challenges and stressors associated with successfully implementing a carbon tax are worth it if a carbon tax means discouraging the use of fossil fuels and cutting down carbon emissions. Though there is no clear consensus on how carbon pricing programs should be designed and administered, a price of some kind should be placed on carbon emissions in order to push countries to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources.

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.

Sources:
  1. “What is a carbon tax?” Tax Policy Center. https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/what-carbon-tax
  2. Wihbey, John. “Pros and Cons of a Carbon Tax: Key Issues.” Yale Climate Connections. July 20, 2016. https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2016/07/pros-and-cons-of-a-carbon-tax-key-issues/?gclid=Cj0KCQiAoIPvBRDgARIsAHsCw08j4EE9-tgtNd53bRCqRvNJtP-y6QXiFciRwCRSkiv8p1-Tc6h8ezcaApuKEALw_wcB
  3. Plumer, Brad and Popovich, Nadja. “These Countries Have Prices on Carbon. Are They Working?” The New York Times. April 2, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/02/climate/pricing-carbon-emissions.html
  4. Weisbach, David A. and Metcalf, Gilbert E. The Design of a Carbon Tax. University of Chicago Law School. 2009. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3033&context=journal_articles
  5. Bryce, Robert. The Three Major Problems with a Carbon Tax. National Review. February 4, 2019.  https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/carbon-tax-proposals-three-major-problems/

Photo credit: Unsplash
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sam Nadler
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​