Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Applications
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

A Big Win For Wall Street Reform Advocates

10/21/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
By Sam Nadler

Sam Nadler is a senior at Vanderbilt University studying history.


The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) scored a major courtroom victory on September 16th against some of the country's largest financial institutions, including some involved in the financial crisis. In a move with great ramifications for Wall Street and future financial regulations, Judge Paul Friedman, US District Court Judge for the District of Columbia, refused to vacate new cross-border swaps rules implemented by the CFTC.  

Regulating swaps, which are contracts that make it easier for derivatives traders to incur risk, is the focal point of the new CFTC rules. Simply put, derivatives are financial instruments that derive their value from an underlying asset. They are contracts between two parties that specifying the rules under which payments are made between the parties. They come in many different asset classes including commodities, bonds, stocks, and currencies, and are used to speculate or hedge market risk. Most of the trading in these financial instruments is known as Over the Counter (OTC), which simply means that it occurs as the result of a privately agreed upon contract between two parties and not through an exchange.
The impetus for the new rules is Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act, aimed at reducing market risk and promoting transparency. The CFTC's mandate in the Dodd-Frank Act (2010) justifies the proposed extraterritorial regulation of OTC derivatives trading according to the ruling. Judge Friedman held that it is entirely appropriate that when "the conduit is located outside the United States, but is owned and controlled by a U.S. person ... to recognize the economic reality of the situation, the conduit's swaps should be attributed to the U.S. affiliate(s).” [1]  

The
Dodd-Frank Act sought to correct many of the perceived abuses that led to the 2008 financial crisis. Because derivatives activity was previously grossly underregulated, Title VII of the act gave the CFTC jurisdiction over the derivative swaps market, whose global size is estimated at $700 trillion. The act extended the reach of the CFTC in this area beyond US borders, providing that any rules or regulations of the CFTC, including Title VII, "shall not apply to activities outside of the United States unless those activities... have a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, commerce in the United States." [2] This extension of jurisdiction beyond US borders was essential for the swaps regulations to have any teeth because, as the plaintiffs in the suit recognized, "the swaps market is truly global: a single swap may be negotiated and executed between counterparties located in two different countries, book in a third country and risk-managed in a fourth country.” [3]


This type of financial activity came under the purview of federal regulators because of the role it played in the financial crisis, specifically the near-collapse of American Insurance Group (AIG). In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the government's
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission noted that AIG was pushed to the brink of failure because "its enormous sales of credit default swaps were made without putting up initial collateral, setting aside capital reserves, or hedging its exposure." The commission stated that, "AIG’s failure was possible because of the sweeping deregulation of over-the-counter derivatives, including credit default swaps, which effectively eliminated federal and state regulation of these products, including capital and margin requirements that would have lessened the likelihood of AIG’s failure." Especially notable in regards to the new cross-border swaps regulations proposed by the CFTC is that AIG set up much of this business in London, outside of the purview of federal regulators. Yet, the failure still had a significant impact on the American economy. Thus, in the aftermath of this failure, legislators sought to empower federal regulators to oversee derivatives activity even outside of American borders.


Under Title VII’s mandate, on July 26, 2013, the CFTC released a document entitled Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement Regarding Compliance With Certain Swap Regulations. This policy statement was a finalization of the Proposed Guidance first published on July 12, 2012 and revised on December 21, 2012. This policy statement established a framework for regulating cross-border swaps but specified that it should be applied on a case-by-case basis. At the time the document was released, the CFTC had not yet made any substituted compliance determinations. The CFTC, therefore, issued an exemptive order providing, among other things, relief from the cross-border application of certain CFTC regulations through December 21, 2013.

Soon before this relief expired, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), and the Institute of International Bankers (IIB) filed a lawsuit challenging the application of the cross-border rules. The lawsuit alleged that the CFTC unlawfully circumvented the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (1946) and the Commodity Exchange Act (1936) by portraying its regulations as “guidance.”  They alleged that the CFTC failed to conduct the necessary cost-benefit analysis required by law. The plaintiffs also argued that the rules’ “overreach could cause global fragmentation in markets,” which could reduce liquidity and significantly harm market participants and market-based financing. Additionally, the lawsuit alleged that by not conducting any cost-benefit analysis, the cross-border rules created "significant administrative, financial, and legal burdens that could negatively affect liquidity and the ability of end users to manage risk."

In his ruling, Judge Freidman struck down the plaintiff’s argument that the CFTC did not have the authority to apply the rules contained in the guidance. He explained that Congress had clearly indicated that the swaps oversight included in Dodd-Frank, including any rules or regulations prescribed by the CFTC, apply outside of the US’s borders. Friedman did question the CFTC for not thoroughly studying the costs and benefits of ten of the rules. However, he declined the industry call to vacate them. Throwing the regulations out “would be unnecessarily disruptive to the CFTC’s mission and the purposes of the Dodd-Frank Act,” the judge wrote.

Highly anticipated by Wall Street and financial regulators, Judge Freidman's ruling was a major victory for regulators looking to reign in the massive abuses that led to the 2008 financial crisis. “Proponents of financial reform secured a major victory,” said Representative Maxine Waters of California, the senior Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee. “It is in the best interests of American taxpayers that the U.S. District Court has expressed an understanding that these efforts to evade important U.S. regulations are contrary to Congressional intent, and only serve to harm consumers and our economy in the long run.”

This case is evidence of a major shift in the balance of power between Wall Street and the federal regulators charged with maintaining order in financial markets.  "This decision is a very big win for financial reform and for transparent derivatives markets," said Dennis Kelleher, who heads Better Markets, a group urging Wall Street reform.

The ruling also pleased the CFTC. “I am pleased the court upheld the Commission’s July 2013 policy statement on the cross-border application of Title VII swaps provisions, and rejected a sweeping injunction of the rules that are at the heart of Dodd-Frank’s overhaul of the swaps markets,” CFTC Chairman Tim Massad said in a statement. “I am committed to continuing our efforts to reform the swaps markets, including addressing Congress's concerns that risks undertaken abroad might threaten the health of the U.S. economy.”

While regulators and market participants will continue to tussle in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, for the meantime, Judge Freidman's ruling is encouraging for financial regulators and proponents of financial reform.

[1] Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al. v. United States Commodities Futures Trading Commission, No. 13 Civ. 1916 (PLF), 2014 US Dist. (D.D.C. Sept. 16, 2014).
[2] 7 U.S.C. § 2(i)
[3] Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al. v. United States Commodities Futures Trading Commission, No. 13 Civ. 1916 (PLF), 2014 US Dist. (D.D.C. Sept. 16, 2014).
Photo credit: Flickr user Anthony Walker

1 Comment
custom assignment writing link
7/1/2017 02:55:42 pm

In business we need to the learn rules and regulation. If we hire expert then we can make it easy to work. Mostly peoples work on high level and it also has chances to lost.

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sam Nadler
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​