Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


INTERESTED IN wRITING FOR tHE rOUNDTABLE?

Hybrid Courts

9/25/2019

1 Comment

 
Picture
By Suprateek Neogi
Suprateek Neogi is a fourth year student at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab studying Law and specializing in Business Laws.
​Hybrid Courts, also known as ‘internationalized national criminal courts’, are a unique type of ad-hoc court which has components of both, domestic and international legal systems. Hybrid courts usually deal with international crimes occurring within the domestic boundaries of a State. [1]​
Violations of jus cogens norms, which are universally accepted norms on human rights, like genocide, terrorism and other human rights violations are usually the subject matter of crimes before hybrid courts. In such cases, questions of jurisdiction are often complex. Due to the international nature of the crimes committed, they cannot be tried by domestic courts. In such situations, trials can either be held by international courts like the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) or by ad-hoc hybrid courts.

Since every nation is a sovereign, and recognizes no higher law than its own, they cannot be compelled to submit to adjudication under any international tribunal. Countries usually prefer adjudication by their domestic courts, which is not feasible in cases of violations of international law.

Despite jurisdictional issues and no recourse available in domestic courts, sometimes the affected countries still do not have faith in the international courts like the International Criminal Court (“ICC”). For instance, the ICC has been criticised by African nations claiming that it only investigates and prosecutes Africans, turning a blind eye to the so-called ‘first world countries’. [2] The ICC does not have legitimacy in the eyes of some countries. [3]

Contrary to purely international courts like the ICC, hybrid courts have legitimacy in the eyes of the stakeholders as they are established either by an agreement between the States and the United Nations (“UN”) or by bilateral agreements. They are set up on a case by case basis, usually in post-conflict situations pertaining to violations of international law.

So, in a situation where domestic and even purely international trials are not feasible, hybrid courts need to be set up.

Since hybrid courts primarily follow domestic laws, sovereign nations willingly repose their trust in them. It is a promising approach which addresses jurisdictional issues amongst sovereign nations and enforces justice as per respective domestic laws. [4]

One such example is of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and the Special Prosecutors Office. These institutions were temporary and had jurisdiction over certain crimes against humanity, war crimes and other crimes under Kosovo law which allegedly occurred between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2000. The Specialist Chambers have a seat in The Hague, the Netherlands, and was staffed with international judges, prosecutors and staff. [5]

In the “Lockerbie” case, two Libyan nationals were tried by Scottish law in a neutral location, i.e., Netherlands, despite claims of jurisdiction over the trial by US and UK. The accused had bombed a Pan Am aircraft flying over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing more than two hundred people. The United States wanted to try the accused as the aircraft was of the US and the United Kingdom wanted to try the accused as the aircraft crashed on their soil. After two years of diplomatic manoeuvring by all the stakeholder countries, a hybrid court was set up to try the two accused Libyan nationals by Scottish law in a neutral location, i.e., the Hague, Netherlands. [6]

A unique example is the “Special Court" set by the government of Sierra Leone and the UN. The Special Court was set to address serious international war crimes against civilians and UN peacekeepers committed during the country's decade-long (1991-2002) civil war. This court was dealt purely with international law but was established by a domestic statute. [7]

We can see that there is no hard and fast rule regarding how an ideal hybrid court should be instituted and what blend of international and national laws should be achieved. [8] Hybrid courts combine in various ways the application of international crimes and international personnel, while retaining significant national features. [9] The composition of the blend would depend on the situation of the State as explained by the examples. [10]

In view of this, certain types of hybrid courts can be distinguished. One type would consist of “internationalized” domestic courts which are part of the domestic judicial system like the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and the Special Prosecutors Office. Another type would include international ad hoc tribunals which have national elements like the special court set up in the Lockerbie case. [11] Sierra Leone also sets a different model of a hybrid court. It was a national court dealing with international crimes.

Despite having legitimacy in the eyes of the affected parties, hybrid courts may not be recognized by other third party States as they do not benefit from compulsory cooperation like purely international courts mandated by the United Nations Security Council (“UNSC”). [12] The decisions of these courts are not binding on any third parties. Operations of hybrid courts in East Timor, Sierra Leone and Kosovo have to a larger or lesser extent been hampered by this feature. [13]

Such situations can be avoided. If the UNSC determines that the lack of cooperation by third States constitutes a threat to the “maintenance of international peace and security”, [14] in accordance with the rationale of the Charter of the UN, it can oblige States to cooperate with any court, including hybrid courts.

​Hybrid courts are a unique solution to resolving jurisdictional and related political issues in case of international crimes. However, hybrid courts’ can be more effective if the UN and its affiliated bodies more actively support the implementation of the decisions of various hybrid courts.

The opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
References
[1]  Carroll, Caitlin.  “Hybrid Tribunals are the Most Effective Structure for Adjudicating International Crimes Occurring Within a Domestic State”, Law School Student Scholarship, Seton Hall University (2013): 90. Last accessed date September 22. https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=student_scholarship.
[2]  Hart, Laurel. “The International Criminal Court: biased or simply misunderstood?,” United Nations Association – UK. Last accessed date September 22. 2019.https://www.una.org.uk/magazine/2018-1/international-criminal-court-biased-or-simply-misunderstood.
[3]  S. Nouwen, “‘Hybrid Courts’ The Hybrid Category Of A New Type Of International Crimes Courts”, Utrecht Law Review, Volume 2, Issue 2 (2006), Last accessed date September 22. https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.32/galley/32/download/.
[4]  Dickinson, L. “The Relationship between Hybrid Courts and International Courts: The Case of Kosovo”, New England Law Review (2003): 1059-1072, 1060. Last accessed date September 22, 2019. http://grocjusz.edu.pl/Materials/_archiwum/archiwum2014/js_sem_20150410_A.pdf.
[5] “Kosovo Specialist Chambers & Specialist Prosecutor's Office”. Last accessed date September 22, 2019. https://www.scp-ks.org/en.
[6]  Scharf, Michael. “A Preview of the Lockerbie Case”, American Society of International Law – Insights, Volume 5, Issue 5 (2000). Last accessed date September 22, 2019. https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/5/issue/5/preview-lockerbie-case.
[7]  “Its History and Jurisprudence”, Special Court for Sierra Leone. Last accessed date September 22, 2019. http://www.rscsl.org/.
[8]  Muharremi, R., “The Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office”, Heidelberg Journal of International Law, Volume 76 (2016): 967-992. Last accessed date September 22, 2019.  https://www.zaoerv.de/76_2016/76_2016_4_a_967_992.pdf.
[9]  Reiger, C. “Hybrid and Internationalized Tribunals”, in: Giorgetti C. , International Litigation in Practice, Volume 4: Practice and Jurisprudence of International Courts and Tribunals (2012), Last accessed date September 22, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284780842_Hybrid_and_internationalized_tribunals.
[10]  Supra note 3.
[11]  Supra note 6, p 969.
[12]  “UN Doc. S/2004/616”, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies: 1, Last accessed date September 22, 2019. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents/document/pcs-s-2004-616.php.
[13]  Kleffner, J. et al., “The Relationship between Internationalized Courts and National Courts”, in: C. Romano et al. (eds.), Internationalized Criminal Courts and Tribunals (2004): 359-378, 378, https://works.bepress.com/andre_nollkaemper/20/.
[14]  Charter of the United Nations, Art. 48.
1 Comment
Sukesh Bhowal
9/26/2019 12:35:55 am

Lucid and insightful reading. Increasing globalisation in commerce with increasing nationalism in politics will demand more such courts be set up to resolve disputes.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Harshit Rai
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Pheby Liu
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Picture
Picture
​