Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


The Detrimental Impacts of Nonprofits in Politics: A Plea for Transparency

2/5/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Luis Bravo

​Luis Bravo is a freshman at the University of Pennsylvania


In 2008, California became the first state to deprive citizens of their rights by rewriting its constitution through the passage of the infamous, Proposition 8. [1] Amongst heavy opposition, this amendment limited the recognition of marriage to unions between a man and a woman, dissolving the previously instituted marriage rights of same-sex couples. Its ratification is largely attributed to The Church of Latter-Day Saints which heavily funded a series of successful media campaigns under the guise of the nonprofit, the National Organization For Marriage. [2] This funding was subsequently utilized to produce propaganda in various formats to sway public opinion. Under federal regulations, however, nonprofit organizations are prohibited from participating in political activities or risk losing their tax-exempt status. [3] Nevertheless, due to the Citizens United decision in conjunction with ambiguous tax codes, these practices are deemed permissible, granting nonprofits an unrestrained ability to affect American politics. In order to have a truly just nation, one that embodies the democratic ideals we strive to uphold, it is essential that we reevaluate existing policies and instate stricter provisions to limit the power of nonprofit interest groups.

As their name implies, nonprofit groups are organizations that redistribute any economic revenue for the sole purpose of aiding the lives of others. The United States’ Internal Revenue Services recognizes the merit of such organizations and awards them a tax-exempt status as outlined in section 501(c) of the IRS tax code. [4] In other words, these groups operate as if they had no income. While there are many types of nonprofits, most fall under the category of 501(c)(3) which are groups with charitable, educational, religious, or scientific purposes, among others. Meant to be isolated from political issues, donations to these groups qualify as tax deductions in individual income tax reports for the donors. Similarly, most other nonprofits fall under section 501(c)(4), which are groups meant to operate exclusively for the general welfare, but have become increasingly active in political campaigns. Because these groups are allowed minimal political involvement, donors do not qualify for tax deductions, but nonprofits are still not taxed for any of the money they receive. Several nonprofits have circumvented this by creating two distinct groups, one a 501(c)(3) and the other a 501(c)(4). In this way, money can be easily transferred between both organizations, and can be used for political purposes; in addition, donors will always qualify for tax deduction. This loophole is vital because both types of nonprofits are not subject to disclosure laws. While groups in the 501(c)(4) category are allowed greater political freedoms, it is important to recognize that neither group is legally able to support or endorse any partisan candidate or action. [5]


However, that is exactly what has been occurring. Nonprofit groups such as United Against Nuclear Iran are utilizing nontaxable economic resources to advocate partisan legislative action. Much like the National Organization For Marriage, these groups create and distribute propaganda and even call constituents urging them to take a specific course of action. Moreover, these kinds of nonprofits are expected to increase their influence in the 2016 presidential race. Currently, eight Republican candidates have established nonprofits to support their campaigns. Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton has also expressed interest in raising money through the group, Priorities USA Action. [6] The real danger from nonprofits comes from a lack of transparency. As they are not legally required to comprehensively disclose their funding sources, it is difficult to track donors; even if records are requested, the sources can be completely opaque. In essence, this means that monumentally wealthy individuals and behemoth corporations can indirectly support campaigns or political movements without being exposed (and all while enjoying a hefty tax deduction).

Although in an ideal world the Citizens United decision would be overturned, the current political climate would not allow such a monumental change. Therefore, we must dismantle this judicial error in fragments. Principally, the IRS must develop clear limits on the permissible political activities of nonprofits--the current guidelines are awfully vague. By doing so, the government would be able to hold nonprofits accountable for inappropriate political involvement. Additionally, the IRS must mandate nonprofits, especially those with dubious political affiliations, to provide detailed and periodic expense reports outlining both the sources of their funding and the intended use of those funds. It is time the IRS stops turning a blind eye on these organizations.

The greatest impact of the Citizens United decision was the desertion, without proper justification, of the previously held definition of corruption. Instead, it was replaced by a narrower definition that requires explicitly quid pro quo actions; in other words, there must be a clear evidence of bribery. [7] This definition, however, is not extensive, and allows a range of activities that under other definitions of corruption would be impermissible. Ultimately, we should reinstate the legal definition of corruption that has been used in the past, or better yet, adopt a more comprehensive definition that incorporates issues unique to contemporary society.

In no way am I advocating that individuals, or even corporations, should be prohibited from supporting candidates or legislative action. I do believe, however, that at the very least, individuals should have the ability to know who is behind these massive ad campaigns that most Americans are exposed to. Seemingly innocent nonprofit organizations such as Energy Tomorrow run advertisements that look like they stem from individual interests, and I believe that if more Americans were aware that groups such as the American Petroleum Industry are a major source of their funding, the political opinions of the American people would drastically change. [8] Additionally, if these interest groups under the guise of nonprofits choose to participate in political activities, it is imperative they be taxed accordingly. The sad reality is that money is power. However, taxation allows the economic playing field to be somewhat leveled, if only minimally. While we are a long way from achieving transparency in politics, reducing the political power of nonprofits is integral to the process, and a powerful start.


[1]  Holden, Stephen. "Marching in the War on Gay Marriage." The New York Times. June 17, 2010. Accessed January 21, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/18/movies/18eight.html
[2] Karger, Fred. "Will Mormon Church Keep Funding NOM?" The Huffington Post. December 21, 2013. Accessed January 21, 2016. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fred-karger/will-mormon-church-keep-f_b_4485852.html
[3]  Vanden, Kathryn. "Mixing Politics with Nonprofits." Mixing Politics with Nonprofits. Accessed January 21, 2016. http://www.alliance1.org/magazine/spring06/nonprofit-law/mixing-politics-with-nonprofits
[4]  Cornell University Law School. "26 U.S. Code § 501 - Exemption from Tax on Corporations, Certain Trusts, Etc." LII / Legal Information Institute. Accessed January 21, 2016. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/501
[5]  Internal Revenue Service. "Political Activity and Social Welfare." Internal Revenue Service. December 16, 2015. Accessed January 20, 2016. https://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Other-Non-Profits/Political-Activity-and-Social-Welfare
[6]  Lichtblau, Eric. "I.R.S. Expected to Stand Aside as Nonprofits Increase Role in 2016 Race." The New York Times. July 05, 2015. Accessed January 21, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/06/us/politics/irs-expected-to-stand-aside-as-nonprofits-increase-role-in-2016-race.html?_r=0
[7]  Wertheimer, Fred. "Citizens United and Its Disastrous Consequences: The Decision." The Huffington Post. January 14, 2016. Accessed January 21, 2016. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fred-wertheimer/citizens-united-and-its-d_b_8979252.html
[8]  Grass, Alison. "Who Supports Fracking?" Food & Water Watch. November 28, 2015. Accessed January 21, 2016. http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/insight/who-supports-fracking

Photo Credit: Flickr User Mike Chaput

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Aaron Tsui
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alexandra Kerrigan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Amanda Damayanti
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Arshiya Pant
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Catherine Tang
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Jewell
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Hannah Steinberg
    Harshit Rai
    Hennessis Umacta
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Ingrid Holmquist
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Khlood Awan
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyan Casamalhuapa
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Michael Merolla
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nathan Liu
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nicole Patel
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Paula Vekker
    Pheby Liu
    Pragat Patel
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Samantha Graines
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Tyler Ringhofer
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.