Regina Salmons is a sophomore at the University of Pennsylvania studying English.
If you wanted to bet on sports (legally, that is) you would have to find your way to Nevada, Oregon, Delaware or Montana. These four states are exempt from the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), also known as the Bradley Act. The act was named thusly due to the efforts of Bill Bradley, a senator from New Jersey and former hall of fame basketball player for the New York Knicks, who was a main sponsor of the 1992 bill. . PASPA’s intention was to stop the spread of sports betting in the United States during a time when legalized casinos were rapidly emerging.  The four exempted states were grandfathered in.
There was a clause in PAPSA that allowed any state where legalized gambling had been present for at least ten years to apply for legalized sports gambling, of which New Jersey and Nevada were eligible to do so, being the only two states to have legalized casinos prior to 1989. However, New Jersey failed to do so, losing the opportunity to legalize sports betting.  It appears that New Jersey regrets that decision. In 2011, New Jersey asked voters if sports betting should become legal, to which 64% responded yes in a non-binding referendum.  The amendment permitted the New Jersey Legislature to legalize sports gambling at casinos (with the exception of college athletics) becoming law in 2012. However, immediately following the approval of the law, five sports leagues, including the NCAA, NFL, NBA, NHL, and MLB sued on the grounds that it violated PAPSA.
If the law were to pass, many argue that it would “irreparably” corrupt sports in the United States. However, New Jersey isn’t the only state interested in legalizing sports gambling. Indiana, Minnesota, New York, South Carolina, and Texas have also introduced measures to legalize sports gambling. According to a survey done by the American Gaming Association, over 95 billion dollars will be bet during the 2015-16 NFL season, only two of which will be done legally in Nevada. 
Would legalizing gambling really further corrupt the sporting world, considering how large of a scale it exists on already? Would making it legal bring the corruption to an end, or merely elevate it? Would it be truly detrimental to the amateurism and professionalism we expect from elite American athletes? By allowing sports gambling, do we encourage a culture of negativity, and allow the loss of integrity?
Some argue that by allowing sports gambling to be government regulated, jobs would be created that could help boost New Jersey’s struggling economy. But would these jobs be worth the price? The five sports leagues who came together to oppose New Jersey certainly think so. The NCAA has already canceled several sporting events in the state, and has stated that it would not hesitate to bar New Jersey from hosting events in the future if sports gambling was to be allowed.  Arguments arise that with sports gambling, the temptation to fix or throw games would be introduced. Almost a hundred years since the infamous Black Sox scandal, we ask ourselves the same questions about our culture. What are we willing to gamble for the freedom to bet on sports?
 "Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act - PASPA - Online Gambling Sites." Online Gambling Sites. Accessed November 19, 2015. http://www.onlinegamblingsites.com/paspa/
 Accessed November 20, 2015. http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/144546p.pdf.
 Barrabi, Thomas. "Legalized Sports Gambling? Americans To Bet $95 Billion On NFL, College Football This Season, Mostly Illegally, Group Says." International Business Times. September 9, 2015. Accessed November 20, 2015. http://www.ibtimes.com/legalized-sports-gambling-americans-bet-95-billion-nfl-college-football-season-mostly-2089606.
 Drape, Joe. "Cash-Hungry States Eye Sports Betting, to Leagues’ Dismay." The New York Times. March 27, 2013. Accessed November 20, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/28/sports/more-states-look-to-get-in-the-sports-betting-game.html.
Photo Credit: Flickr User Images Money
The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.