Penn Undergraduate Law Journal
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Masthead
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Partner Journals
    • Sponsors
  • Submissions
  • Full Issues
  • The Roundtable
    • Pre-Law Corner
  • Events
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Apply
    • FAQs

The Roundtable


Welcome to the Roundtable, a forum for incisive commentary and analysis
on cases and developments in law and the legal system.


A Dramatic Change in Patent Law

7/13/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Alicia Kysar

Alicia Kysar is a graduate of Columbia University who studied political science and Pre-Law.


In a decision that received very little media attention, June 13,  the Supreme Court dramatically changed the way in which patent infringement cases will work in the future. [1] The case responsible for the decision, Halo Electronics, Inc v Pulse Electronics, Inc.  fundamentally changed how enhanced damages in intellectual property law will be determined and granted.


The facts of the case
depict a relatively standard dispute between two electronics companies on the usage of a new technology: Halo alleged that Pulse had infringed on the former’s patents for electronic packages that included transformers that could be mounted onto circuit boards. Instead of confronting Pulse outright about his alleged violation, Halo instead sent Pulse two letters in 2002, offering to provide them with licenses for the usage of the technology, thus legitimizing it and righting the infringement. An engineer working for Pulse, however, decided that Halo’s claim to the relevant patent was invalid, and Pulse continued selling the transformers in question. Eventually, Halo took legal action against Pulse, and the case reached the Supreme Court in 2015, with a decision handed down in 2016. [2]
The specific issue that was argued throughout various courts had to to do with the Patent Act’s allowance for triple damages: Section 284 of the Act grants that in cases of infringement, “the court may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed.” [3] Thus for certain particularly egregious cases of copyright infringement, the court may decide to triple the damages already awarded, either by a judge or by a jury.

There were, however, specific standards in place that determined when the court could grant triple damages, and these guidelines had been established in the case In re Seagate Technology, LLC, and were fittingly referred to as the Seagate Test. It was a two-pronged test, with one objective and one subjective approach to establishing willful infringement.


The first part of the test was that the patent owner had the responsibility to show that the “clear and convincing evidence that the infringer acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of a valid patent.” [4] As has now become a well-known aspect of intellectual property law, the “state of mind of the accused infringer is not relevant to this objective inquiry.” [5] Thus, regardless of whether or not the accused infringer was aware that their actions violated the Patent Act, they would be found responsible as long as there was an objectively high likelihood that they would have known. This prong of the test came to be known as the test of “objective recklessness.”


​The second part of the test was the subjective aspect. It stated that “the patentee must also demonstrate that this objectively-defined risk (determined by the record developed in the infringement proceeding) was either known or so obvious that it should have been known to the accused infringer.” [6] Thus the objective aspect establishes whether or not there was a high likelihood that the accused infringer was violating a valid patent, while the subjective aspect asks whether or not the accused infringer should have known about this likelihood of infringement.


In Halo v Pulse, however, the Supreme Court found that the Seagate Test was “unduly rigid” and that it “impermissibly encumbers the statutory grant of discretion to district courts.” The court argued that there are many cases of willful and deliberate infringement that do not necessarily qualify as “objectively reckless,” and thus do not entitle the patent-holder to triple damages. This development in intellectual property law closes loopholes for willful patent infringers, thus opening up the possibility of many more cases in the future that are eligible for triple damages.

[1] ScotusBlog: Supreme Court of the United States Blog. “Halo Electronics, Inc. v Pulse Electronics, Inc.” February 23, 2016. http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/halo-electronics-inc-v-pulse-electronics-inc/
[2] Halo Electronics, Inc. v Pulse Electronics, Inc. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1513_db8e.pdf
[3] 35 United States Code § 284 – Damages https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/284
[4] In Re Seagate Technology https://casetext.com/case/in-re-seagate-technology-llc?passage=YcOIr0u6GMbrUm5_Rtivyg
[5] In Re Seagate Technology https://casetext.com/case/in-re-seagate-technology-llc?passage=YcOIr0u6GMbrUm5_Rtivyg
[6] In Re Seagate Technology https://casetext.com/case/in-re-seagate-technology-llc?passage=YcOIr0u6GMbrUm5_Rtivyg

The opinions and views expressed through this publication are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of the Penn Undergraduate Law Journal, our staff, or our clients.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.


    Categories

    All
    Aaron Tsui
    Akshita Tiwary
    Alana Bess
    Alana Mattei
    Albert Manfredi
    Alexander Saeedy
    Alexandra Aaron
    Alexandra Kanan
    Alexandra Kerrigan
    Alice Giannini
    Alicia Augustin
    Alicia Kysar
    Ally Kalishman
    Ally Margolis
    Alya Abbassian
    Amanda Damayanti
    Anika Prakash
    Anna Schwartz
    Arshiya Pant
    Ashley Kim
    Astha Pandey
    Audrey Pan
    Benjamin Ng'aru
    Brónach Rafferty
    Bryce Klehm
    Cary Holley
    Catherine Tang
    Christina Gunzenhauser
    Christine Mitchell
    Christopher Brown
    Clarissa Alvarez
    Cole Borlee
    Connor Gallagher
    Dan Spinelli
    Dan Zhang
    David Katz
    Davis Berlind
    Derek Willie
    Dhilan Lavu
    Edgar Palomino
    Edna Simbi
    Ella Jewell
    Ella Sohn
    Emma Davies
    Esther Lee
    Evelyn Bond
    Filzah Belal
    Frank Geng
    Gabrielle Cohen
    Gabriel Maliha
    Georgia Ray
    Graham Reynolds
    Habib Olapade
    Hailie Goldsmith
    Haley Son
    Hannah Steinberg
    Harshit Rai
    Hennessis Umacta
    Henry Lininger
    Hetal Doshi
    Ingrid Holmquist
    Iris Zhang
    Irtaza Ali
    Isabela Baghdady
    Ishita Chakrabarty
    Jack Burgess
    Jessica "Lulu" Lipman
    Joe Anderson
    Jonathan Lahdo
    Jonathan Stahl
    Joseph Squillaro
    Justin Yang
    Kaitlyn Rentala
    Kanishka Bhukya
    Katie Kaufman
    Kelly Liang
    Keshav Sharma
    Ketaki Gujar
    Khlood Awan
    Lauren Pak
    Lavi Ben Dor
    Libby Rozbruch
    Lindsey Li
    Luis Bravo
    Lyan Casamalhuapa
    Lyndsey Reeve
    Madeline Decker
    Maja Cvjetanovic
    Maliha Farrooz
    Marco DiLeonardo
    Margaret Lu
    Matthew Caulfield
    Michael Keshmiri
    Michael Merolla
    Mina Nur Basmaci
    Muskan Mumtaz
    Natalie Peelish
    Natasha Darlington
    Natasha Kang
    Nathan Liu
    Nayeon Kim
    Nicholas Parsons
    Nicholas Williams
    Nicole Greenstein
    Nicole Patel
    Nihal Sahu
    Omar Khoury
    Owen Voutsinas Klose
    Owen Voutsinas-Klose
    Paula Vekker
    Pheby Liu
    Pragat Patel
    Rachel Bina
    Rachel Gu
    Rachel Pomerantz
    Rebecca Heilweil
    Regina Salmons
    Sajan Srivastava
    Samantha Graines
    Sandeep Suresh
    Sanjay Dureseti
    Sarah Simon
    Saranya Das Sharma
    Saranya Sharma
    Sasha Bryski
    Saxon Bryant
    Sean Foley
    Sebastian Bates
    Serena Camici
    Shahana Banerjee
    Shannon Alvino
    Shiven Sharma
    Siddarth Sethi
    Sneha Parthasarathy
    Sneha Sharma
    Sophie Lovering
    Steven Jacobson
    Suaida Firoze
    Suprateek Neogi
    Takane Shoji
    Tanner Bowen
    Taryn MacKinney
    Thomas Cribbins
    Todd Costa
    Tyler Larkworthy
    Tyler Ringhofer
    Vatsal Patel
    Vikram Balasubramanian
    Vishwajeet Deshmukh
    Wajeeha Ahmad
    Yeonhwa Lee

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.